In the western world, calcific aortic stenosis (AS), the most common valvular heart disease, represents a major public health burden.
1 Currently, there is no pharmacological treatment that prevents or slows the progression of AS.
2 Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are the only therapies to significantly improve both survival and symptoms
3,4 and are recommended in symptomatic patients with severe AS.
5,6 Quiz Ref ID The management of patients with asymptomatic severe AS, particularly the choice between early intervention vs watchful waiting, continues to be a matter of debate.
7,8 Current guidelines advocate delaying AVR until symptoms or left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction develop.
5,6 However, observational studies in 2010
9 and 2015
10 have suggested that early elective AVR might improve outcomes in patients with severe asymptomatic AS. This approach has been reinforced by continued advances in surgical techniques and aortic valve prostheses, the advent of TAVR, and the low perioperative mortality and morbidity rates achieved in valve centers of reference.
11,12 However, preemptive surgery before onset of symptoms or LV systolic dysfunction is considered in only a selected group of patients after careful risk stratification. This is at least in part because the evidence for intervention in asymptomatic severe AS is derived from small, heterogeneous, retrospective, single-center studies, which have generally included the need for AVR (not always motivated by the development of symptoms or LV dysfunction) in the composite study end point.
13-20 Moreover, decision making for AVR remains particularly difficult in older patients in whom it is sometimes unclear if the benefits of intervention outweigh the risk.
5,6