Morris Weinberger

Dr. Morris Weinberger


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 October 2002 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMorris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger
MMMichael D. Murray
Michael D. Murray
DMDavid G. Marrero
David G. Marrero
NBNancy Brewer
Nancy Brewer
MLMichael Lykens
Michael Lykens
WTWilliam M. Tierney
William M. Tierney
Reactive airways diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are prevalent, morbid, and costly long-term conditions.1-8 Although exacerbations are potentially preventable by appropriate drug therapy,9,10 patients often have difficulty following prescribed regimens. Pharmacists may be able to enhance patients' compliance and outcomes by engaging in pharmaceutical care activities (eg, monitoring symptoms, providing medication counseling, helping resolve drug-related problems, facilitating communication with physicians).11,12 Pharmaceutical care is promising because: (1) pharmacists have the knowledge and skills to identify and resolve patients' medication-related problems; (2) patients often have several physicians but frequently patronize a single pharmacy; (3) pharmacists are often the last health professional whom patients see before taking their medication; and (4) pharmacists are trusted by patients.13

22 January 2015 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSara Jacobs
Sara Jacobs
BWBryan J Weiner
Bryan J Weiner
BRBryce B Reeve
Bryce B Reeve
DHDavid A Hofmann
David A Hofmann
MCMichael Christian
Michael Christian
MWMorris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger
The failure rates for implementing complex innovations in healthcare organizations are high. Estimates range from 30% to 90% depending on the scope of the organizational change involved, the definition of failure, and the criteria to judge it. The innovation implementation framework offers a promising approach to examine the organizational factors that determine effective implementation. To date, the utility of this framework in a healthcare setting has been limited to qualitative studies and/or group level analyses. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantitatively examine this framework among individual participants in the National Cancer Institute’s Community Clinical Oncology Program using structural equation modeling. We examined the innovation implementation framework using structural equation modeling (SEM) among 481 physician participants in the National Cancer Institute’s Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP). The data sources included the CCOP Annual Progress Reports, surveys of CCOP physician participants and administrators, and the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Overall the final model fit well. Our results demonstrated that not only did perceptions of implementation climate have a statistically significant direct effect on implementation effectiveness, but physicians’ perceptions of implementation climate also mediated the relationship between organizational implementation policies and practices (IPP) and enrollment (p <0.05). In addition, physician factors such as CCOP PI status, age, radiological oncologists, and non-oncologist specialists significantly influenced enrollment as well as CCOP organizational size and structure, which had indirect effects on implementation effectiveness through IPP and implementation climate. Overall, our results quantitatively confirmed the main relationship postulated in the innovation implementation framework between IPP, implementation climate, and implementation effectiveness among individual physicians. This finding is important, as although the model has been discussed within healthcare organizations before, the studies have been predominately qualitative in nature and/or at the organizational level. In addition, our findings have practical applications. Managers looking to increase implementation effectiveness of an innovation should focus on creating an environment that physicians perceive as encouraging implementation. In addition, managers should consider instituting specific organizational IPP aimed at increasing positive perceptions of implementation climate. For example, IPP should include specific expectations, support, and rewards for innovation use.

22 November 2011 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCourtney Harold Van Houtven
Courtney Harold Van Houtven
KMKarina Melendez
Karina Melendez
MWMorris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger
Caregiver interventions may help improve the quality of informal care. Yet the lack of a systematic framework specifying the targets and outcomes of caregiver interventions hampers our ability to understand what has been studied, to evaluate existing programs, and to inform the design of future programs. Our goal was to develop an organizing framework detailing the components of the caregiving activities and the caregiver and care recipient outcomes that should be affected by an intervention. In so doing, we characterize what has been measured in the published literature to date and what should be measured in future studies to enable comparisons across interventions and across time.

1 September 2010 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTalya Salz
Talya Salz
MWMorris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger
JAJohn Z Ayanian
John Z Ayanian
NBNoel Brewer
Noel Brewer
CECraig C Earle
Craig C Earle
RSRobert S Sandler
Robert S Sandler
Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics.

22 March 2010 in Chronic Illness
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CHCourtney Harold Van Houtven
Courtney Harold Van Houtven
EOEugene Z. Oddone
Eugene Z. Oddone
MWMorris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger
Objectives: To describe the informal care network of US veterans referred to home and community-based services (Homemaker Home Health services, H/HHA, or Home-Based Primary Care, HBPC) at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), including: quantity and types of tasks provided and desired content for caregiver training programs. Methods: All primary care patients referred to H/HHA or HBPC during the preceding 3 months were sent questionnaires in May 2007. Additionally, caregivers were sent questionnaires if a patient gave permission. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were performed. Results: On average, patients received 5.6 hours of VA care and 47 hours of informal care per week. 26% of patients (38% of patients with caregiver proxy respondents) and 59% of caregivers indicated the caregiver would be interested in participating in a training program by phone or on-site. Significant barriers to participation existed. The most common barriers were: transportation; no time due to caregiving or work demands; caregiver’s own health limitations; and no need. Conclusions: Caregiver training needs to be tailored to overcome barriers to participate. Overcoming these barriers may be possible through in-home phone or internet training outside traditional business hours, and by tailoring training to accommodate limiting health problems among caregivers.

11 June 2009 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDarren A DeWalt
Darren A DeWalt
KBKimberly A Broucksou
Kimberly A Broucksou
VHVictoria Hawk
Victoria Hawk
DBDavid W Baker
David W Baker
DSDean Schillinger
Dean Schillinger
MPMichael Pignone
Michael Pignone
Background: Heart failure (HF) is common, costly and associated with significant morbidity and poor quality of life, particularly for patients with low socioeconomic status. Self-management training has been shown to reduce HF related morbidity and hospitalization rates, but there is uncertainty about how best to deliver such training and what patients benefit. This study compares a single session self-management HF training program against a multiple session training intervention and examines whether their effects differ by literacy level. Methods/Design: In this randomized controlled multi-site trial, English and Spanish-speaking patients are recruited from university-affiliated General Internal Medicine and Cardiology clinics at 4 sites across the United States. Eligible patients have HF with New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms and are prescribed a loop diuretic. Baseline data, including literacy level, are collected at enrollment and follow-up surveys are conducted at 1, 6 and 12 months Upon enrollment, both the control and intervention groups receive the same 40 minute, literacy-sensitive, in-person, HF education session covering the 4 key self-management components of daily self assessment and having a plan, salt avoidance, exercise, and medication adherence. All participants also receive a literacy-sensitive workbook and a digital bathroom scale. After the baseline education was completed, patients are randomly allocated to return to usual care or to receive ongoing education and training. The intervention group receives an additional 20 minutes of education on weight and symptom-based diuretic self-adjustment, as well as periodic follow-up phone calls from the educator over the course of 1 year. These phone calls are designed to reinforce the education, assess participant knowledge of the education and address barriers to success. The primary outcome is the combined incidence of all cause hospitalization and death. Secondary outcomes include HF-related quality of life, HF-related hospitalizations, knowledge regarding HF, self-care behavior, and self-efficacy. The effects of each intervention will be stratified by patient literacy, in order to identify any differential effects. Discussion: Enrollment of the proposed 660 subjects will continue through the end of 2009. Outcome assessments are projected to be completed by early 2011. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT00378950