Andrew Gordon

Andrew Gordon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in JAMA Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
INIona Novak
Iona Novak
Catherine MorganCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
LALars Adde
Lars Adde
JBJames Blackman
James Blackman
RBRoslyn N. Boyd
Roslyn N. Boyd
NBNadia Badawi
Nadia Badawi
Importance Cerebral palsy describes the most common physical disability in childhood and occurs in 1 in 500 live births. Historically, the diagnosis has been made between age 12 and 24 months but now can be made before 6 months’ corrected age. Objectives To systematically review best available evidence for early, accurate diagnosis of cerebral palsy and to summarize best available evidence about cerebral palsy–specific early intervention that should follow early diagnosis to optimize neuroplasticity and function. Evidence Review This study systematically searched the literature about early diagnosis of cerebral palsy in MEDLINE (1956-2016), EMBASE (1980-2016), CINAHL (1983-2016), and the Cochrane Library (1988-2016) and by hand searching. Search terms includedcerebral palsy,diagnosis,detection,prediction,identification,predictive validity,accuracy,sensitivity, andspecificity. The study included systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, criteria of diagnostic accuracy, and evidence-based clinical guidelines. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA statement, and recommendations are reported according to the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Findings Six systematic reviews and 2 evidence-based clinical guidelines met inclusion criteria. All included articles had high methodological Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) ratings. In infants, clinical signs and symptoms of cerebral palsy emerge and evolve before age 2 years; therefore, a combination of standardized tools should be used to predict risk in conjunction with clinical history. Before 5 months’ corrected age, the most predictive tools for detecting risk are term-age magnetic resonance imaging (86%-89% sensitivity), the Prechtl Qualitative Assessment of General Movements (98% sensitivity), and the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (90% sensitivity). After 5 months’ corrected age, the most predictive tools for detecting risk are magnetic resonance imaging (86%-89% sensitivity) (where safe and feasible), the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (90% sensitivity), and the Developmental Assessment of Young Children (83% C index). Topography and severity of cerebral palsy are more difficult to ascertain in infancy, and magnetic resonance imaging and the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination may be helpful in assisting clinical decisions. In high-income countries, 2 in 3 individuals with cerebral palsy will walk, 3 in 4 will talk, and 1 in 2 will have normal intelligence. Conclusions and Relevance Early diagnosis begins with a medical history and involves using neuroimaging, standardized neurological, and standardized motor assessments that indicate congruent abnormal findings indicative of cerebral palsy. Clinicians should understand the importance of prompt referral to diagnostic-specific early intervention to optimize infant motor and cognitive plasticity, prevent secondary complications, and enhance caregiver well-being.

19 September 2016 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CIChristine Imms
Christine Imms
MGMats Granlund
Mats Granlund
PWPeter H. Wilson
Peter H. Wilson
BSBert Steenbergen
Bert Steenbergen
PRPeter L Rosenbaum
Peter L Rosenbaum
AGAndrew Gordon
Andrew Gordon

1 February 1991 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAndrew Gordon
Andrew Gordon
HFHans Forssberg
Hans Forssberg
RJR. S. Johansson
R. S. Johansson
GWG. Westling
G. Westling

1 June 1993 in Journal of Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAndrew Gordon
Andrew Gordon
GWG. Westling
G. Westling
KCK. J. Cole
K. J. Cole
RJR. S. Johansson
R. S. Johansson
1. While subjects lifted a variety of commonly handled objects of different shapes, weights, and densities, the isometric vertical lifting force opposing the object's weight was recorded from an analog weight scale, which was instrumented with high-stiffness strain gauge transducers. 2. The force output was scaled differently for the various objects from the first lift, before sensory information related to the object's weight was available. The force output was successfully specified from information in memory related to the weight of common objects, because only small changes in the force-rate profiles occurred across 10 consecutive lifts. This information was retrieved during a process related to visual identification of the target object. 3. The amount of practice necessary to appropriately scale the vertical lifting and grip (pinch) force was also studied when novel objects (equipped with force transducers at the grip surfaces) of different densities were encountered. The mass of a test object that subjects had not seen previously was adjusted to either 300 or 1,000 g by inserting an appropriate mass in the object's base without altering its appearance. This resulted in either a density that was in the range of most common objects (1.2 kg/l) or a density that was unusually high (4.0 kg/l). 4. Low vertical-lifting and grip-force rates were used initially with the high-density object, as if a lighter object had been expected. However, within the first few trials, the duration of the loading phase (period of isometric force increase before lift-off) was reduced by nearly 50% and the employed force-rate profiles were targeted for the weight of the object.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

29 March 2016 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Catherine MorganCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
JDJohanna Darrah
Johanna Darrah
AGAndrew Gordon
Andrew Gordon
RHRegina Harbourne
Regina Harbourne
Alicia Jane SpittleAlicia Jane Spittle
Alicia Jane Spittle
LFLinda Fetters
Linda Fetters

26 October 2007 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrew Gordon
Andrew Gordon
JSJennifer A Schneider
Jennifer A Schneider
ACAshley Chinnan
Ashley Chinnan
JCJeanne R Charles
Jeanne R Charles
Children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) have impairments in bimanual coordination above and beyond their unilateral impairments. Recently we developed hand‐arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT), using the principles of motor learning, and neuroplasticity, to address these bimanual impairments. A single‐blinded randomized control study of HABIT was performed to examine its efficacy in children with hemiplegic CP with mild to moderate hand involvement. Twenty children (age range 3y 6mo‐15y 6mo) were randomized to either an intervention (n=10: seven males, three females; mean age 8y 7mo, SD 4y) or a delayed treatment control group (n=10: seven males, three females; mean age 6y 10mo, SD 2y 4mo). Children were engaged in play and functional activities that provided structured bimanual practice 6 hours per day for 10 days. Each child was evaluated immediately before and after the intervention, and again at 1‐month post‐intervention. Children in the intervention group demonstrated improved scores on the Assisting Hand Assessment, increased involved extremity use measured using accelerometry and a caregiver survey, bimanual items of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, and the simultaneity of completing a draw‐opening task with two hands (p<0.05 in all cases). The results suggest that for this carefully selected subgroup of children with hemiplegic CP, HABIT appears to be efficacious in improving bimanual hand use.