Background: Pulsed field ablation is a novel nonthermal cardiac ablation modality using ultra-rapid electrical pulses to cause cell death by a mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Unlike the traditional ablation energy sources, pulsed field ablation has demonstrated significant preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation, and thus avoids certain thermally mediated complications. However, its safety and effectiveness remain unknown in usual clinical care. Methods: MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a retrospective, multinational, patient-level registry wherein patients at each center were prospectively included in their respective center registries. The registry included all patients undergoing postapproval treatment with a multielectrode 5-spline pulsed field ablation catheter to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinical documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia) of ≥30 seconds on the basis of electrocardiographic data after a 3-month blanking period (on or off antiarrhythmic drugs). Safety outcomes included the composite of acute (7 days) major adverse events. Results: At 24 European centers (77 operators) pulsed field ablation was performed in 1568 patients with AF: age 64.5±11.5 years, female 35%, paroxysmal/persistent AF 65%/32%, CHA ₂ DS ₂ -VASc 2.2±1.6, median left ventricular ejection fraction 60%, and left atrial diameter 42 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 99.2% of patients. After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 367 (289–421) days, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 78.1% (95% CI, 76.0%–80.0%); clinical effectiveness was more common in patients with paroxysmal AF versus persistent AF (81.6% versus 71.5%; P =0.001). Acute major adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients. Conclusions: In this large observational registry of the postapproval clinical use of pulsed field technology to treat AF, catheter ablation using pulsed field energy was clinically effective in 78% of patients with AF.

Aims: Initial clinical studies of pulsed field ablation (PFA) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) indicated a >90% durability rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, these studies were largely conducted in single centres and involved a limited number of operators. We aimed to describe the electrophysiological findings and outcomes in patients undergoing repeat ablation after an initial PF ablation for AF. Methods and results: In the MANIFEST-REDO study, we investigated patients who underwent repeat ablation due to clinical recurrence—AF or atrial tachycardia (AT)—following first-ever PVI with a pentaspline PFA catheter (Farawave, Boston Scientific Inc.). At 22 centres, 427 patients (age 64 ± 11 years; 37% female) were included. Of note, the recurrent arrhythmia leading to the repeat ablation was paroxysmal AF (51%), persistent AF (30%), or AT (19%). At the repeat procedure, the PV reconnection rates were 30% (left superior pulmonary vein), 28% (left inferior pulmonary vein), 33% (right superior pulmonary vein), and 32% (right inferior pulmonary vein). In 45% of patients, all PVs were durably isolated at the beginning of the repeat procedure, with the previous use of any imaging or mapping modality being univariately associated with durable PVI. After a post-redo follow-up period of 284 (90–366) days, the primary effectiveness endpoint (freedom from documented AF/AT lasting ≥30 s after 3-month blanking without class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs or symptoms) was achieved in 65% of patients, with significant differences between groups (PAF 65% vs. PersAF 56% vs. AT 76%; P = 0.04). Persistent AF as recurrent arrhythmia after the initial PFA ablation predicted AT/AF recurrence after repeat ablation [hazard ratio 1.241 (95% confidence interval 1.534–1.005); P = 0.045]. The procedural complication rate was 2.8%. Conclusion: In repeat procedures for AF/AT performed after an index procedure with PFA for AF, PV reconnections are not uncommon. Repeat procedures can be performed safely and with an acceptable subsequent success rate.

Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a growing ablation modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study assesses the 6-month safety and effectiveness of a novel balloon-in-basket, mapping-integrated PFA system, with a purpose-built form factor for PVI. Methods and results: The VOLT CE Mark Study is a prospective, multi-center, pre-market study. A total of 150 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF) were enrolled between 8 November 2023 and 14 March 2024, of which 146 patients (age 64.1 ± 10.0 years, 63.0% male, 70.5% PAF) underwent PVI with the balloon-in-basket PFA catheter and system featuring integrated electroanatomic mapping with contact-sensing. Study endpoints were the rate of primary serious adverse events within 7 days as well as acute procedural effectiveness and 6-month freedom from recurrence. Acute effectiveness was achieved in 99.1% (573/578) of treated PVs (98.6% of patients, 144/146) with 17.6 ± 5.7 PFA applications/patient. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell, and transpired ablation times were 100.4 ± 33.0, 17.3 ± 12.1, 39.4 ± 20.6, and 31.4 ± 16.8 min, respectively. There were 4 (2.7%; 4/146) primary serious adverse events. The rate of freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias was 88.2% in PAF patients and 76.7% in PersAF patients (freedom from symptomatic recurrence was documented in 90.2% of PAF patients and 74.4% of PersAF patients) through 6-months post-index procedure. Conclusion: The VOLT CE Mark Study primary results demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the novel balloon-in-basket PFA system to perform PVI in PAF and PersAF.

Over time, atrial fibrillation (AF) naturally progresses from initially paroxysmal to persistent/permanent AF caused by structural and electrical remodelling with a complex underlying pathogenesis. It has been demonstrated that this progression of AF itself is linked to negative cardiovascular outcomes (stroke, systemic embolism, and hospitalization due to heart failure). Consequently, there is a profound rationale for early treatment of AF as a cornerstone of AF management. Recent randomized trials produced evidence that early rhythm control is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm, lower the risk of cardiovascular outcomes, and that catheter ablation of AF is effective to delay AF progression. This review will illuminate current evidence regarding the hypothesis of early AF treatment to prevent AF progression and improve clinical outcomes.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Despite randomized controlled trials and real-world data showing the promise of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for this treatment, long-term efficacy and safety data demonstrating single-procedure outcomes off antiarrhythmic drugs remain limited. The aim of the FARA-Freedom Study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of PFA using the pentaspline catheter for PAF. FARA-Freedom, a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, enrolled patients with PAF undergoing de novo PVI with PFA, who were followed for 12 months with weekly transtelephonic monitoring and a 72-h Holter ECG at 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events out to 7 days post-ablation and PV stenosis or atrioesophageal (AE) fistula out to 12 months. Treatment success is a composite of acute PVI and chronic success, which includes freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia longer than 30 s, use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period, or use of amiodarone or repeat ablation at any time. The study enrolled 179 PAF patients (62 ± 10 years, 39% female) at 13 centres. At the index procedure, all PVs were successfully isolated with the pentaspline PFA catheter. Procedure and left atrial dwell times, with a 20-min waiting period, were 71.9 ± 17.6 and 41.0 ± 13.3 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time was 11.5 ± 7.4 min. Notably, monitoring compliance was high, with 88.4 and 90.3% with weekly events and 72-h Holter monitors, respectively. Freedom from the composite primary effectiveness endpoint was 66.6%, and 41 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, mostly recurrent atrial fibrillation (31 patients). The composite safety endpoint occurred in two patients (1.1%), one tamponade and one transient ischaemic attack. There was no coronary spasm, PV stenosis, or AE fistula. There were four cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy, but all resolved during the index procedure. In this prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter was effective in treating PAF patients despite rigourous endpoint definitions and high monitoring compliance and demonstrated favourable safety. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT05072964 (sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation).