Soil salinization is a global issue resulting in soil degradation, arable land loss and ecological environmental deterioration. Over the decades, multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing have enabled efficient and cost-effective monitoring of salt-affected soils. However, the potential of hyperspectral sensors installed on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to estimate and map soil salinity has not been thoroughly explored. This study quantitatively characterized and estimated field-scale soil salinity using an electromagnetic induction (EMI) equipment and a hyperspectral camera installed on a UAV platform. In addition, 30 soil samples (0~20 cm) were collected in each field for the lab measurements of electrical conductivity. First, the apparent electrical conductivity (EC_a) values measured by EMI were calibrated using the lab measured electrical conductivity derived from soil samples based on empirical line method. Second, the soil salinity was quantitatively estimated using the random forest (RF) regression method based on the reflectance factors of UAV hyperspectral images and satellite multispectral data. The performance of models was assessed by Lin’s concordance coefficient (CC), ratio of performance to deviation (RPD), and root mean square error (RMSE). Finally, the soil salinity of three study fields with different land cover were mapped. The results showed that bare land (field A) exhibited the most severe salinity, followed by dense vegetation area (field C) and sparse vegetation area (field B). The predictive models using UAV data outperformed those derived from GF-2 data with lower RMSE, higher CC and RPD values, and the most accurate UAV-derived model was developed using 62 hyperspectral bands of the image of the field A with the RMSE, CC, and RPD values of 1.40 dS m⁻¹, 0.94, and 2.98, respectively. Our results indicated that UAV-borne hyperspectral imager is a useful tool for field-scale soil salinity monitoring and mapping. With the help of the EMI technique, quantitative estimation of surface soil salinity is critical to decision-making in arid land management and saline soil reclamation.

Soil salinization is a significant global ecological issue that leads to soil degradation and is recognized as one of the primary factors hindering the sustainable development of irrigated farmlands and deserts. The integration of remote sensing (RS) and machine learning algorithms is increasingly employed to deliver cost-effective, time-efficient, spatially resolved, accurately mapped, and uncertainty-quantified soil salinity information. We reviewed articles published between January 2016 and December 2023 on remote sensing-based soil salinity prediction and synthesized the latest research advancements in terms of innovation points, data, methodologies, variable importance, global soil salinity trends, current challenges, and potential future research directions. Our observations indicate that the innovations in this field focus on detection depth, iterations of data conversion methods, and the application of newly developed sensors. Statistical analysis reveals that Landsat is the most frequently utilized sensor in these studies. Furthermore, the application of deep learning algorithms remains underexplored. The ranking of soil salinity prediction accuracy across the various study areas is as follows: lake wetland (R² = 0.81) > oasis (R² = 0.76) > coastal zone (R² = 0.74) > farmland (R² = 0.71). We also examined the relationship between metadata and prediction accuracy: (1) Validation accuracy, sample size, number of variables, and mean sample salinity exhibited some correlation with modeling accuracy, while sampling depth, variable type, sampling time, and maximum salinity did not influence modeling accuracy. (2) Across a broad range of scales, large sample sizes may lead to error accumulation, which is associated with the geographic diversity of the study area. (3) The inclusion of additional environmental variables does not necessarily enhance modeling accuracy. (4) Modeling accuracy improves when the mean salinity of the study area exceeds 30 dS/m. Topography, vegetation, and temperature are relatively significant environmental covariates. Over the past 30 years, the global area affected by soil salinity has been increasing. To further enhance prediction accuracy, we provide several suggestions for the challenges and directions for future research. While remote sensing is not the sole solution, it provides unique advantages for soil salinity-related studies at both regional and global scales.

Soil salinization is a major soil health issue globally. Over the past 40 years, extreme weather and increasing human activity have profoundly changed the spatial distribution of land use and water resources across seven oases in southern Xinjiang, China. However, knowledge of the spatial distribution of soil salinization in this region has not been updated since a land survey in the 1970s to 1980s (the harmonized world soil database, HWSD) due to scarce observational data. Now, given the uncertainty raised by near future climate change, it is important to develop quick, reliable and accurate estimates of soil salinity at larger scales for a better manage strategy to the local fragile ecosystem that with limited land and water resources. This study collected electromagnetic induction (EMI) readings near surface soil to update on the spatial distribution and changes of water and salt in the region and to map apparent electrical conductivity (ECa, mS·m⁻¹), in four coil configurations: vertical dipole in 1.50 m (ECav01) and 0.75 m (ECav05), so as the horizontal dipole in 0.75 m (ECah01) and 0.37 m (ECah05), then all the ECa coil configurations were modeled with random forest algorithm. The validation results showed an R² range of 0.77–0.84 and an RMSE range of 115.17–142.76 mS·m⁻¹. The validation accuracy of deep ECa dipole (ECah01, ECav05, and ECav01) was greater than that of shallow ECa (ECah05), as the former integrated a thicker portion of the subsurface. The range of EC spatial variability that can be explained by ECa is 0.19–0.36 (farmland, mean value is 0.28), grassland is 0.16–0.49 (shrub/grassland, mean value is 0.34), and bare land is 0.28–0.70 (bare land, mean value is 0.56). Among them, ECav01 has the best predictive ability. As the depth increased, the influence of soil-related variables decreased, and the contribution of climate-related variables increased. The main factor affecting ECa variation was climate-related variables, followed by vegetation-related variables and soil-related variables. Scatter plot show ECa was significantly correlated with ECe_HWSD_030 (0–30 cm, r = 0.482, p < 0.01) and ECe_HWSD_30100 (30–100 cm, r = 0.556, p < 0.01). The predicted spatial ECa maps were similar to the ECe values from HWSD, but also implies that the distribution of soil water and salt has undergone tremendous changes since 1980s. The study demonstrates that EMI data provide a reliable and cost-effective tool for obtaining high-resolution soil maps that can be used for better land evaluation and soil improvement at larger scales.

Accurate assessment of the spatial distribution and severity of soil salinization has long plagued local governments and researchers in the arid parts of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XJUAR). The emergence of machine learning has brought hope to this research field, such as Random Forest (RF) and Stochastic Gradient Treeboost (SGT),however, which are few applications to the quantitative assessment of soil salinization. Therefore, in order to evaluate the accuracy level of the two algorithms for predicting soil salinity, twenty-seven environmental subsets were designed. Each data set is calculated using both RF and SGT to produce an optimal set of variables. The simulation results from 70.37% (19/27) of the subsets showed that the predicted value of soil salinity from SGT is closer to the observed value than is that from RF. The statistics of all datasets showed that the average values of R² value for RF and SGT were 0.38 and 0.40, the average Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) value were 28.59 and 27.46, and the Ratio of Prediction to Deviation (RPD) averages were 1.20 and 1.24, respectively. The important dominant factor were topographic variables with coarse resolution, temperature and vegetation indices, land use and landform.