Dong-Gi Lee

Dr. Dong-Gi Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSol Min Lee
Sol Min Lee
JHJung-Sik Huh
Jung-Sik Huh
MBMinki Baek
Minki Baek
KYKoo Han Yoo
Koo Han Yoo
GMGyeong Eun Min
Gyeong Eun Min
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
Lee SM, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Dec;29(12):1684-1687. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1684

30 April 2010 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
JCJeong-Je Cho
Jeong-Je Cho
HPHun Kuk Park
Hun Kuk Park
DKDae Kyung Kim
Dae Kyung Kim
JKJin Il Kim
Jin Il Kim
SLSun-Ju Lee
Sun-Ju Lee

1 January 2013 in Korean Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSunchan Kim
Sunchan Kim
SCSeung-Kwon Choi
Seung-Kwon Choi
SLSol Min Lee
Sol Min Lee
TCTaesoo Choi
Taesoo Choi
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
KYKoo Han Yoo
Koo Han Yoo
Kim S, et al. Korean J Urol. 2013 Nov;54(11):772-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.772

1 October 2005 in International Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
SLSun‐Ju Lee
Sun‐Ju Lee

1 January 2015 in Korean Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTaesoo Choi
Taesoo Choi
KYKoo Han Yoo
Koo Han Yoo
SCSeung-Kwon Choi
Seung-Kwon Choi
DKDong Soo Kim
Dong Soo Kim
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
IJIn-Kyung Jeong
In-Kyung Jeong
Choi T, et al. Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):455-460. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.455

15 April 2013 in European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJung Jun Kim
Jung Jun Kim
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
KPKwan Hyun Park
Kwan Hyun Park
MBMinki Baek
Minki Baek
Introduction The correction of concealed penis requires challenging surgical techniques. We describe a novel technique involving inner preputial skin substitution after degloving through a ventral approach that allows sufficient penile skin coverage and evaluated the efficacy and safety of our technique. Methods From February 2009 to March 2009, 12 boys with concealed penises underwent correction via our novel technique. We administered a questionnaire about penile size, morphology, and voiding status to parents to evaluate their satisfaction with the results. Results The mean age of patients at the time of operation was 4.71 ± 4.01 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 5.11 ± 1.45 months. Parental satisfaction grades (0 to 4) concerning penile size increased from 1.00 ± 1.04 to 2.83 ± 0.94 (p = 0.002) after surgery, penile morphology from 1.00 ± 0.95 to 3.00 ± 0.85 (p = 0.001), and voiding status from 1.08 ± 1.00 to 3.33 ± 0.78 (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up visit. The parental satisfaction rates regarding postoperative changes in size and morphology were 83.3 and 91.7%, respectively. Nine parents (75%) said they would recommend the surgery to others. There were no complications, including postoperative hematoma, infection, and tissue necrosis. Conclusion Our method of correcting concealed penis was demonstrated to be technically feasible and safe. It provides a good cosmetic appearance and excellent parental satisfaction ratings regarding size, morphology, and voiding function.