Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of AV dialysis access failure and is notoriously difficult to treat with conventional venoplasty. Although stent graft (SG) placement has improved patency rate, they are prone to stent failure caused by edge stenosis. We investigate the effect of SG diameter relative to cephalic vein on patency rate among hemodialysis patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous access caused by CAS. We identified 22 patients with recalcitrant cephalic arch stenosis or post-venoplasty vessel rupture and received SG placement. Patients were divided into two groups based on the stent-to-vessel diameter (S/V) ratio: undersized group, < 1; and apposed group, 1–1.2. Outcomes were assessed through follow-up angiography. S/V ratio was significant smaller in the undersized patient group (p < 0.001). Placement of undersized SG demonstrated higher primary stent (p = 0.001) and access patency rates (p = 0.021) and a reduced number of post-treatment reinterventions per access year (p = 0.021). A decreased number of lateral edge stenosis was noted in undersized SG (p = 0.005). Increased S/V ratio was significantly associated with lateral edge stenosis (OR = 5.19; p = 0.027). Undersized SG is associated with higher primary stent and access patency rate, and decreased number of post-SG interventions, and are suggested in the treatment of cephalic arch stenosis.

Purpose: We assessed the efficacy and safety of different modalities using the network meta-analysis for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion. The interested modalities included stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or TACE, TACE plus sorafenib, and use of SBRT, HAIC, sorafenib, and TACE alone. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published up to June 2017. We used network meta-analysis to compare the disease control rate (DCR) and severe adverse events for the eight interested regimens included in this analysis. Study quality was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations method. Results: Fifteen studies published between 2010 and 2016 involving a total of 2,359 patients were enrolled in this network meta-analysis. With indirect comparison of DCR and overall safety, the pooled results showed that RT plus HAIC was the most effective regimen in treating advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis, followed by RT plus TACE. HAIC alone and sorafenib combined with HAIC appeared least effective intervention regimens. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred less in the patients who received SBRT alone compared with other interested regimens. Conclusion: 3D-RT combined with HAIC or TACE showed more favorable treatment responses compared with other regimens in advanced HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Bypass grafting is the standard of care for chronic aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD, aka Leriche Syndrome) but is associated with mortality rates of up to 25% if surgical re-intervention is necessary. Despite a recent shift towards an endovascular-first strategy for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II ("TASC II") C and D lesions, reports from Leriche Syndrome are still limited. 15 high-risk patients (11 male, 4 female), mean age of 60.6 years, with chronic aorto-iliac occlusive disease were retrospectively reviewed. Retrograde approaches via the bilateral femoral arteries for aortic occlusion less than 4 cm in length and/or antegrade fashion from the brachial artery for juxtarenal type lesions were made. For the latter, thrombolysis prior to angioplasty was also performed. Intraluminal or if necessary, subintimal angioplasty was performed with deployment of either bare metal stents or stentgrafts in a kissing-stent fashion. A total of 28 iliac arteries and 14 occluded abdominal aorta were treated with 100% technical success, of which 25% success were achieved by using subintimal technique. Two minor complications occurred, including vascular rupture and distal emboli in one patient apiece, which were successfully managed via endovascular fashion. There were no complications of renal artery emboli. Primary and secondary patency rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 92.3% and 100%; 83.9% and 100%; and 83.9% and 100%, respectively. Endovascular therapy for chronic aorto-iliac occlusion has a high technical success rate, with good short- and mid-term primary and secondary patency rates and may provide a valid alternative to surgery for high-risk patients.