Tadeus Nawka

Prof. Tadeus Nawka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2012 in Journal of Voice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka
UKUwe Konerding
Uwe Konerding

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFelix Caffier
Felix Caffier
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka
KNKonrad Neumann
Konrad Neumann
MSMatthias Seipelt
Matthias Seipelt
PCPhilipp P. Caffier
Philipp P. Caffier
The international nine-item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i) is a clinically established short-scale version of the original VHI, quantifying the patients’ self-assessed vocal handicap. However, the current vocal impairment classification is based on percentiles. The main goals of this study were to establish test–retest reliability and a sound statistical basis for VHI-9i severity levels. Between 2009 and 2021, 17,660 consecutive cases were documented. A total of 416 test–retest pairs and 3661 unique cases with complete multidimensional voice diagnostics were statistically analyzed. Classification candidates were the overall self-assessed vocal impairment (VHIs) on a four-point Likert scale, the dysphonia severity index (DSI), the vocal extent measure (VEM), and the auditory–perceptual evaluation (GRB scale). The test–retest correlation of VHI-9i total scores was very high (r = 0.919, p < 0.01). Reliability was excellent regardless of gender or professional voice use, with negligible dependency on age. The VHIs correlated best with the VHI-9i, whereas statistical calculations proved that DSI, VEM, and GRB are unsuitable classification criteria. Based on ROC analysis, we suggest modifying the former VHI-9i severity categories as follows: 0 (healthy): 0 ≤ 7; 1 (mild): 8 ≤ 16; 2 (moderate): 17 ≤ 26; and 3 (severe): 27 ≤ 36.

29 April 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka
MGMarkus Gugatschka
Markus Gugatschka
JKJan-Constantin Kölmel
Jan-Constantin Kölmel
AMAndreas Harald Müller
Andreas Harald Müller
BSBerit Schneider-Stickler
Berit Schneider-Stickler
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusOrlando Guntinas-Lichius
Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
To collect data on diagnosis, treatment, patient’s management, and quality of life in patient with bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVFP). A retrospective, observational, multicenter registry study was performed. Medical records of 326 adults with permanent BVFP (median age: 61 years; 70% female, 60% after thyroid surgery) generated between 2010 and 2017. Median time between BVFP onset and inclusion was 1.2 years. Median post-treatment follow-up was 2 months (range: 0–42). Surgery was treatment of choice in 61.7% of the cases, with a 2-year revision rate of 32.4%. Prior to inclusion, 40.2% of the patients underwent at least one surgery. For tracheotomized patients, decannulation rate was 33.8%. Non-surgical treatments included voice therapy and botulinum toxin injection. Corticosteroid application was the most frequent treatment for post-treatment complications (18%; 1-month after surgery). Older age was an independent predictor for dyspnea (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.041; CI = 1.005 to 1.079; p = 0.026) and the need for oxygen treatment (HR = 1.098; CI = 1.009 to 1.196; p = 0.031). Current alcohol consumption (HR = 2.565; CI = 1.232 to 5.342; p = 0.012) and a cancer-related etiology (HR = 4.767; CI = 1.615 to 14.067; p = 0.005) were independent factors of higher revision risk. Surgery for BVFP is currently not standardized but highly variable. Postoperative and BVFP-related complications and revision surgery are frequent. Complications are linked to patients’ alcohol drinking habits and BVFP etiology. These results shall be confirmed by the upcoming evaluation of the prospective data of this registry.

16 August 2022 in Dysphagia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDoris-Maria Denk-Linnert
Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert
DFdaniele farneti
daniele farneti
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka
AZAntoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
MMMieke Moerman
Mieke Moerman
AGAhmed Geneid
Ahmed Geneid
The need for multidisciplinary and multiprofessional management of dysphagia is constantly increasing and creating a major challenge for healthcare professionals and society, especially in terms of professional expertise and human resources. The distribution of tasks among the dysphagia team members, which includes phoniatricians, otolaryngologists, and speech-language therapists, is flexible and overlapping. For assessing dysphagia, the (fibreoptic) flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), with or without videofluoroscopy, is a pivotal diagnostic tool. This position paper aims to illustrate the phoniatrician’s role in performing a FEES, which is an indispensable component of the diagnostic workup of patients suffering from oropharyngeal dysphagia. It is based on the current collaborative expert view of the Swallowing Committee of the Union of European Phoniatricians and a literature review. A FEES is one of the core competences of phoniatricians due to their endoscopic expertise and experience in the field of dysphagia and diseases of the upper aerodigestive tract. Therefore, the phoniatrician is an important member of the dysphagia team, for the medical diagnostics of the aerodigestive tract and dysphagia as well as for FEES. Phoniatric competence is especially important for head and neck cancer patients, infants, and complex cases.

31 August 2016 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPhilipp P. Caffier
Philipp P. Caffier
ANAhmed I. Nasr
Ahmed I. Nasr
SWSebastian Weikert
Sebastian Weikert
JRJulius Rummich
Julius Rummich
MGManfred Gross
Manfred Gross
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka

Verified
Open access
Dr. Christoph ArensDr. Christoph Arens
Dr. Christoph Arens
IHIngo F. Herrmann
Ingo F. Herrmann
SRSaskia Rohrbach
Saskia Rohrbach
CSCornelia Schwemmle
Cornelia Schwemmle
TNTadeus Nawka
Tadeus Nawka