Simon Khagi

Dr. Simon Khagi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2019 in CNS Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VKVaibhav Kumar
Vaibhav Kumar
PEPatrick J Eulitt
Patrick J Eulitt
ABAna Bermudez
Ana Bermudez
SKSimon Khagi
Simon Khagi
Adult onset hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare condition, usually secondary to either a precipitating infective or hematologic malignancy. We present a case of Epstein-Barr virus associated HLH in a 55-year-old female receiving treatment for a glioblastoma (GBM). It is possible that HLH is under recognized, as patients with GBM often have features of a nonspecific systemic inflammatory response syndrome, multiorgan failure and cognitive decline. A high index of suspicion and increased awareness can help improve timeliness of diagnosis. Therapeutically, Epstein-Barr virus associated HLH in patients with solid organ malignancy poses significant challenges. An individualized, multidisciplinary approach is essential when managing adult-onset HLH and providers will need to be mindful of the high mortality rate despite treatment.

17 August 2021 in Onco
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DZDaniel Zeitouni
Daniel Zeitouni
MCMichael Catalino
Michael Catalino
JWJordan Wise
Jordan Wise
SMSean McCabe
Sean McCabe
KPKathryn Pietrosimone
Kathryn Pietrosimone
SKSimon Khagi
Simon Khagi
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is driven by various genomic alterations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) could yield targetable alterations that might impact outcomes. The goal of this study was to describe how NGS can inform targeted therapy (TT) in this patient population. METHODS: The medical records of patients with a diagnosis of GBM from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Records of patients with recurrent GBM and genomic alterations were evaluated. Objective response rates and disease control rates were determined. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients with GBM underwent NGS. Forty percent (n = 35) were considered to have actionable alterations. Of these 35, 40% (n = 14) had their treatment changed due to the alteration. The objective response rate (ORR) of this population was 43%. The disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The absolute mean decrease in contrast-enhancing disease was 50.7% (95% CI 34.8–66.6). CONCLUSION: NGS for GBM, particularly in the recurrent setting, yields a high rate of actionable alterations. We observed a high ORR and DCR, reflecting the value of NGS when deciding on therapies to match genomic alterations. In conclusion, patient selection and the availability of NGS might impact outcomes in select patients with recurrent GBM.

28 July 2020 in Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NTNicholas P. Tschernia
Nicholas P. Tschernia
SKSimon Khagi
Simon Khagi