The recent surge in machine learning augmented turbulence modelling is a promising approach for addressing the limitations of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. This work presents the development of the first open-source dataset, curated and structured for immediate use in machine learning augmented corrective turbulence closure modelling. The dataset features a variety of RANS simulations with matching direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) data. Four turbulence models are selected to form the initial dataset: k-ε, k-ε-ϕ_t-f, k-ω, and k-ω SST. The dataset consists of 29 cases per turbulence model, for several parametrically sweeping reference DNS/LES cases: periodic hills, square duct, parametric bumps, converging-diverging channel, and a curved backward-facing step. At each of the 895,640 points, various RANS features with DNS/LES labels are available. The feature set includes quantities used in current state-of-the-art models, and additional fields which enable the generation of new feature sets. The dataset reduces effort required to train, test, and benchmark new corrective RANS models. The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/2637500.

Despite well-known limitations of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, this methodology remains the most widely used tool for predicting many turbulent flows due to computational efficiency. Machine learning is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of RANS simulations. One major area of improvement is using machine learning models to represent the complex relationship between the mean flow field gradients and the Reynolds stress tensor. In the present work, modifications to improve the stability of previous optimal eddy viscosity approaches for RANS simulations are presented and evaluated. The optimal eddy viscosity is reformulated with a non-negativity constraint, which promotes numerical stability. We demonstrate that the new formulation of the optimal eddy viscosity improves conditioning of RANS equations for a periodic hills test case. To demonstrate the suitability of this proportional/orthogonal tensor decomposition for use in a physics-informed data-driven turbulence closure, we use two neural networks (structured on this specific tensor decomposition, which is incorporated as an inductive bias into the network design) to predict the newly reformulated linear and non-linear parts of the Reynolds stress tensor. Injecting these network model predictions for the Reynolds stresses into RANS simulation improves predictions of the velocity field, even when compared to a sophisticated (state of the art) physics-based turbulence closure model. Finally, we apply shapley additive explanations values to obtain insights from the learned representation for inner workings of the neural network used to predict the optimal eddy viscosity from the input feature data.

A comprehensive review of modelling techniques for the flow-induced vibration (FIV) of bluff bodies is presented. This phenomenology involves bidirectional fluid–structure interaction (FSI) coupled with non-linear dynamics. In addition to experimental investigations of this phenomenon in wind tunnels and water channels, a number of modelling methodologies have become important in the study of various aspects of the FIV response of bluff bodies. This paper reviews three different approaches for the modelling of FIV phenomenology. Firstly, we consider the mathematical (semi-analytical) modelling of various types of FIV responses: namely, vortex-induced vibration (VIV), galloping, and combined VIV-galloping. Secondly, the conventional numerical modelling of FIV phenomenology involving various computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methodologies is described, namely: direct numerical simulation (DNS), large-eddy simulation (LES), detached-eddy simulation (DES), and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) modelling. Emergent machine learning (ML) approaches based on the data-driven methods to model FIV phenomenology are also reviewed (e.g., reduced-order modelling and application of deep neural networks). Following on from this survey of different modelling approaches to address the FIV problem, the application of these approaches to a fluid energy harvesting problem is described in order to highlight these various modelling techniques for the prediction of FIV phenomenon for this problem. Finally, the critical challenges and future directions for conventional and data-driven approaches are discussed. So, in summary, we review the key prevailing trends in the modelling and prediction of the full spectrum of FIV phenomena (e.g., VIV, galloping, VIV-galloping), provide a discussion of the current state of the field, present the current capabilities and limitations and recommend future work to address these limitations (knowledge gaps).