Francis Marsac

Dr. Francis Marsac

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2018 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPatricia Miloslavich
Patricia Miloslavich
NBNicholas J. Bax
Nicholas J. Bax
SSSamantha E. Simmons
Samantha E. Simmons
EKEduardo Klein
Eduardo Klein
WAWard Appeltans
Ward Appeltans
YSYunne‐Jai Shin
Yunne‐Jai Shin
Sustained observations of marine biodiversity and ecosystems focused on specific conservation and management problems are needed around the world to effectively mitigate or manage changes resulting from anthropogenic pressures. These observations, while complex and expensive, are required by the international scientific, governance and policy communities to provide baselines against which the effects of human pressures and climate change may be measured and reported, and resources allocated to implement solutions. To identify biological and ecological essential ocean variables (EOVs) for implementation within a global ocean observing system that is relevant for science, informs society, and technologically feasible, we used a driver‐pressure‐state‐impact‐response (DPSIR) model. We (1) examined relevant international agreements to identify societal drivers and pressures on marine resources and ecosystems, (2) evaluated the temporal and spatial scales of variables measured by 100+ observing programs, and (3) analysed the impact and scalability of these variables and how they contribute to address societal and scientific issues. EOVs were related to the status of ecosystem components (phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass and diversity, and abundance and distribution of fish, marine turtles, birds and mammals), and to the extent and health of ecosystems (cover and composition of hard coral, seagrass, mangrove and macroalgal canopy). Benthic invertebrate abundance and distribution and microbe diversity and biomass were identified as emerging EOVs to be developed based on emerging requirements and new technologies. The temporal scale at which any shifts in biological systems will be detected will vary across the EOVs, the properties being monitored and the length of the existing time‐series. Global implementation to deliver useful products will require collaboration of the scientific and policy sectors and a significant commitment to improve human and infrastructure capacity across the globe, including the development of new, more automated observing technologies, and encouraging the application of international standards and best practices.

19 May 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEmilie Tew Kai
Emilie Tew Kai
VRVincent Rossi
Vincent Rossi
JSJoel Sudre
Joel Sudre
HWHenri Weimerskirch
Henri Weimerskirch
CLCristobal Lopez
Cristobal Lopez
VGVeronique Garçon
Veronique Garçon
Meso- and submesoscales (fronts, eddies, filaments) in surface ocean flow have a crucial influence on marine ecosystems. Their dynamics partly control the foraging behavior and the displacement of marine top predators (tuna, birds, turtles, and cetaceans). In this work we focus on the role of submesoscale structures in the Mozambique Channel in the distribution of a marine predator, the Great Frigatebird. Using a newly developed dynamic concept, the finite-size Lyapunov exponent (FSLE), we identified Lagrangian coherent structures (LCSs) present in the surface flow in the channel over a 2-month observation period (August and September 2003). By comparing seabird satellite positions with LCS locations, we demonstrate that frigatebirds track precisely these structures in the Mozambique Channel, providing the first evidence that a top predator is able to track these FSLE ridges to locate food patches. After comparing bird positions during long and short trips and different parts of these trips, we propose several hypotheses to understand how frigatebirds can follow these LCSs. The birds might use visual and/or olfactory cues and/or atmospheric current changes over the structures to move along these biologic corridors. The birds being often associated with tuna schools around foraging areas, a thorough comprehension of their foraging behavior and movement during the breeding season is crucial not only to seabird ecology but also to an appropriate ecosystemic approach to fisheries in the channel.

1 January 2007 in Fisheries Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMichel Potier
Michel Potier
Francis MarsacFrancis Marsac
Francis Marsac
YCYves Cherel
Yves Cherel
VLVincent Lucas
Vincent Lucas
RSRichard Sabatié
Richard Sabatié
FMFrédéric Ménard
Frédéric Ménard

1 January 2004 in Marine Ecology Progress Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWHenri Weimerskirch
Henri Weimerskirch
MCMatthieu Le Corre
Matthieu Le Corre
SJSébastien Jaquemet
Sébastien Jaquemet
MPMichel Potier
Michel Potier
Francis MarsacFrancis Marsac
Francis Marsac

7 January 2005 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWH. Weimerskirch
H. Weimerskirch
MCM. Le Corre
M. Le Corre
YRY. Ropert-Coudert
Y. Ropert-Coudert
AKA. Kato
A. Kato
Francis MarsacFrancis Marsac
Francis Marsac
In seabirds a broad variety of morphologies, flight styles and feeding methods exist as an adaptation to optimal foraging in contrasted marine environments for a wide variety of prey types. Because of the low productivity of tropical waters it is expected that specific flight and foraging techniques have been selected there, but very few data are available. By using five different types of high-precision miniaturized logger (global positioning systems, accelerometers, time depth recorders, activity recorders, altimeters) we studied the way a seabird is foraging over tropical waters. Red-footed boobies are foraging in the day, never foraging at night, probably as a result of predation risks. They make extensive use of wind conditions, flying preferentially with crosswinds at median speed of 38 km h(-1), reaching highest speeds with tail winds. They spent 66% of the foraging trip in flight, using a flap-glide flight, and gliding 68% of the flight. Travelling at low costs was regularly interrupted by extremely active foraging periods where birds are very frequently touching water for landing, plunge diving or surface diving (30 landings h(-1)). Dives were shallow (maximum 2.4 m) but frequent (4.5 dives h(-1)), most being plunge dives. While chasing for very mobile prey like flying fishes, boobies have adopted a very active and specific hunting behaviour, but the use of wind allows them to reduce travelling cost by their extensive use of gliding. During the foraging and travelling phases birds climb regularly to altitudes of 20-50 m to spot prey or congeners. During the final phase of the flight, they climb to high altitudes, up to 500 m, probably to avoid attacks by frigatebirds along the coasts. This study demonstrates the use by boobies of a series of very specific flight and activity patterns that have probably been selected as adaptations to the conditions of tropical waters.