Lucian Dragut

Prof. Dr. Lucian Dragut

Department of Geography, West University of Timişoara, Timișoara 300223, Romania

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mariana BelgiuMariana Belgiu
Mariana Belgiu
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut

2 March 2010 in International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut
Dirk TiedeDirk Tiede
Dirk Tiede
SLShaun Levick
Shaun Levick
The spatial resolution of imaging sensors has increased dramatically in recent years, and so too have the challenges associated with extracting meaningful information from their data products. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) is gaining rapid popularity in remote sensing science as a means of bridging very high spatial resolution (VHSR) imagery and GIS. Multiscalar image segmentation is a fundamental step in OBIA, yet there is currently no tool available to objectively guide the selection of appropriate scales for segmentation. We present a technique for estimating the scale parameter in image segmentation of remotely sensed data with Definiens Developer®. The degree of heterogeneity within an image-object is controlled by a subjective measure called the ‘scale parameter’, as implemented in the mentioned software. We propose a tool, called estimation of scale parameter (ESP), that builds on the idea of local variance (LV) of object heterogeneity within a scene. The ESP tool iteratively generates image-objects at multiple scale levels in a bottom-up approach and calculates the LV for each scale. Variation in heterogeneity is explored by evaluating LV plotted against the corresponding scale. The thresholds in rates of change of LV (ROC-LV) indicate the scale levels at which the image can be segmented in the most appropriate manner, relative to the data properties at the scene level. Our tests on different types of imagery indicated fast processing times and accurate results. The simple yet robust ESP tool enables fast and objective parametrization when performing image segmentation and holds great potential for OBIA applications.

1 February 2014 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut
Ovidiu CsillikOvidiu Csillik
Ovidiu Csillik
CEC. Eisank
C. Eisank
Dirk TiedeDirk Tiede
Dirk Tiede
We introduce a new automated approach to parameterising multi-scale image segmentation of multiple layers, and we implemented it as a generic tool for the eCognition® software. This approach relies on the potential of the local variance (LV) to detect scale transitions in geospatial data. The tool detects the number of layers added to a project and segments them iteratively with a multiresolution segmentation algorithm in a bottom-up approach, where the scale factor in the segmentation, namely, the scale parameter (SP), increases with a constant increment. The average LV value of the objects in all of the layers is computed and serves as a condition for stopping the iterations: when a scale level records an LV value that is equal to or lower than the previous value, the iteration ends, and the objects segmented in the previous level are retained. Three orders of magnitude of SP lags produce a corresponding number of scale levels. Tests on very high resolution imagery provided satisfactory results for generic applicability. The tool has a significant potential for enabling objectivity and automation of GEOBIA analysis.

1 November 2006 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut
Thomas BlaschkeThomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke

1 October 2014 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mariana BelgiuMariana Belgiu
Mariana Belgiu
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut
Although multiresolution segmentation (MRS) is a powerful technique for dealing with very high resolution imagery, some of the image objects that it generates do not match the geometries of the target objects, which reduces the classification accuracy. MRS can, however, be guided to produce results that approach the desired object geometry using either supervised or unsupervised approaches. Although some studies have suggested that a supervised approach is preferable, there has been no comparative evaluation of these two approaches. Therefore, in this study, we have compared supervised and unsupervised approaches to MRS. One supervised and two unsupervised segmentation methods were tested on three areas using QuickBird and WorldView-2 satellite imagery. The results were assessed using both segmentation evaluation methods and an accuracy assessment of the resulting building classifications. Thus, differences in the geometries of the image objects and in the potential to achieve satisfactory thematic accuracies were evaluated. The two approaches yielded remarkably similar classification results, with overall accuracies ranging from 82% to 86%. The performance of one of the unsupervised methods was unexpectedly similar to that of the supervised method; they identified almost identical scale parameters as being optimal for segmenting buildings, resulting in very similar geometries for the resulting image objects. The second unsupervised method produced very different image objects from the supervised method, but their classification accuracies were still very similar. The latter result was unexpected because, contrary to previously published findings, it suggests a high degree of independence between the segmentation results and classification accuracy. The results of this study have two important implications. The first is that object-based image analysis can be automated without sacrificing classification accuracy, and the second is that the previously accepted idea that classification is dependent on segmentation is challenged by our unexpected results, casting doubt on the value of pursuing ‘optimal segmentation’. Our results rather suggest that as long as under-segmentation remains at acceptable levels, imperfections in segmentation can be ruled out, so that a high level of classification accuracy can still be achieved.

1 March 2012 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LDLucian Dragut
Lucian Dragut
CEClemens Eisank
Clemens Eisank
►First object-based classification of Earth's topography from 1 km SRTM. ► Results resemble patterns of existing global and regional classifications. ► Procedure fully automated, results exported as shapefiles. ► Results embedded in a web application for visualization and download.