Aashish Soni

Dr. Aashish Soni

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEmil Mladenov
Emil Mladenov
SMSimon Magin
Simon Magin
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
Radiation therapy plays an important role in the management of a wide range of cancers. Besides innovations in the physical application of radiation dose, radiation therapy is likely to benefit from novel approaches exploiting differences in radiation response between normal and tumor cells. While ionizing radiation (IR)* induces a variety of DNA lesions, including base damages and single-strand breaks (SSBs), the DNA double-strand break (DSB) is widely considered as the lesion responsible not only for the aimed cell killing of tumor cells, but also for the general genomic instability that leads to the development of secondary cancers among normal cells. Homologous recombination repair (HRR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and alternative NHEJ, operating as a backup, are the major pathways utilized by cells for the processing of DSBs. Therefore, their function represents a major mechanism of radiation resistance in tumor cells. HRR is also required to overcome replication stress - a potent contributor to genomic instability that fuels cancer development. HRR and alternative NHEJ show strong cell cycle dependency and are likely to benefit from radiation therapy mediated redistribution of tumor cells throughout the cell cycle. Moreover, the synthetic lethality phenotype documented between HRR deficiency and PARP inhibition has opened new avenues for targeted therapies. These observations make HRR a particularly intriguing target for treatments aiming to improve the efficacy of radiation therapy. Here, we briefly describe the major pathways of DSB repair and review their possible contribution to cancer cell radioresistance. Finally, we discuss promising alternatives for targeting DSB repair to improve radiation therapy and cancer treatment.

1 November 2015 in Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
TMTamara Murmann
Tamara Murmann
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XPXile Pei
Xile Pei
EMEmil Mladenov
Emil Mladenov
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni
FLFanghua Li
Fanghua Li
Martin StuschkeMartin Stuschke
Martin Stuschke
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
PTEN has been implicated in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), particularly through homologous recombination (HR). However, other data fail to demonstrate a direct role of PTEN in DSB repair. Therefore, here, we report experiments designed to further investigate the role of PTEN in DSB repair. We emphasize the consequences of PTEN loss in the engagement of the four DSB repair pathways—classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ), HR, alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) and single strand annealing (SSA)—and analyze the resulting dynamic changes in their utilization. We quantitate the effect of PTEN knockdown on cell radiosensitivity to killing, as well as checkpoint responses in normal and tumor cell lines. We find that disruption of PTEN sensitizes cells to ionizing radiation (IR). This radiosensitization is associated with a reduction in RAD51 expression that compromises HR and causes a marked increase in SSA engagement, an error-prone DSB repair pathway, while alt-EJ and c-NHEJ remain unchanged after PTEN knockdown. The G2-checkpoint is partially suppressed after PTEN knockdown, corroborating the associated HR suppression. Notably, PTEN deficiency radiosensitizes cells to PARP inhibitors, Olaparib and BMN673. The results show the crucial role of PTEN in DSB repair and show a molecular link between PTEN and HR through the regulation of RAD51 expression. The expected benefit from combination treatment with Olaparib or BMN673 and IR shows that PTEN status may also be useful for patient stratification in clinical treatment protocols combining IR with PARP inhibitors.

1 July 2021 in Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTamara Murmann-Konda
Tamara Murmann-Konda
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni
MSMartin Stuschke
Martin Stuschke
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni
XDXiaolu Duan
Xiaolu Duan
Martin StuschkeMartin Stuschke
Martin Stuschke
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
The intra-S-phase checkpoint was among the first reported cell cycle checkpoints in mammalian cells. It transiently slows down the rate of DNA replication after DNA damage to facilitate repair and thus prevents genomic instability. The ionizing radiation (IR)-induced intra-S-phase checkpoint in mammalian cells is thought to be mainly dependent upon the kinase activity of ATM. Defects in the intra-S-phase checkpoint result in radio-resistant DNA synthesis (RDS), which promotes genomic instability. ATM belongs to the PI3K kinase family along with ATR and DNA-PKcs. ATR has been shown to be the key kinase for intra-S-phase checkpoint signaling in yeast and has also been implicated in this checkpoint in higher eukaryotes. Recently, contributions of DNA-PKcs to IR-induced G2-checkpoint could also be established. Whether and how ATR and DNA-PKcs are involved in the IR-induced intra-S-phase checkpoint in mammalian cells is incompletely characterized. Here, we investigated the contributions of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs to intra-S-phase checkpoint activation after exposure to IR of human and hamster cells. The results suggest that the activities of both ATM and ATR are essential for efficient intra-S-phase checkpoint activation. Indeed, in a wild-type genetic background, ATR inhibition generates stronger checkpoint defects than ATM inhibition. Similar to G2 checkpoint, DNA-PKcs contributes to the recovery from the intra-S-phase checkpoint. DNA-PKcs–deficient cells show persistent, mainly ATR-dependent intra-S-phase checkpoints. A correlation between the degree of DSB end resection and the strength of the intra-S-phase checkpoint is observed, which again compares well to the G2 checkpoint response. We conclude that the organization of the intra-S-phase checkpoint has a similar mechanistic organization to that of the G2 checkpoint in cells irradiated in the G2 phase.

13 August 2024 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XLXixi Lin
Xixi Lin
ASAashish Soni
Aashish Soni
RHRazan Hessenow
Razan Hessenow
YSYanjie Sun
Yanjie Sun
EMEmil Mladenov
Emil Mladenov
George IliakisGeorge Iliakis
George Iliakis
The PARP inhibitor (PARPi), Talazoparib (BMN673), effectively and specifically radiosensitizes cancer cells. Radiosensitization is mediated by a shift in the repair of ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) toward PARP1-independent, alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is a key component of this PARP1-independent alt-EJ pathway and we show here that its inhibition can further radiosensitize talazoparib-treated cells. The purpose of the present work is to explore mechanisms and dynamics underpinning enhanced talazoparib radiosensitization by Polθ inhibitors in HR-proficient cancer cells. Radiosensitization to PARPis, talazoparib, olaparib, rucaparib and veliparib was assessed by clonogenic survival. Polθ-proficient and -deficient cells were treated with PARPis and/or with the Polθ inhibitors ART558 or novobiocin. The role of DNA end-resection was studied by down-regulating CtIP and MRE11 expression using siRNAs. DSB repair was assessed by scoring γH2AX foci. The formation of chromosomal abnormalities was assessed as evidence of alt-EJ function using G2-specific cytogenetic analysis. Talazoparib exerted pronounced radiosensitization that varied among the tested cancer cell lines; however, radiosensitization was undetectable in normal cells. Other commonly used PARPis, olaparib, veliparib, or rucaparib were ineffective radiosensitizers under our experimental conditions. Although genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of Polθ only mildly radiosensitized cancer cells, talazoparib-treated cells were markedly further radiosensitized. Mechanistically, talazoparib shunted DSBs to Polθ-dependent alt-EJ by enhancing DNA end-resection in a CtIP- and MRE11-dependent manner - an effect detectable at low, but not high IR doses. Chromosomal translocation analysis in talazoparib-treated cells exposed to Polθ inhibitors suggested that PARP1- and Polθ-dependent alt-EJ pathways may complement, but also back up each other. We propose that talazoparib promotes low-dose, CtIP/MRE11-dependent resection and increases the reliance of irradiated HR-proficient cancer cells, on Polθ-mediated alt-EJ. The combination of Polθ inhibitors with talazoparib suppresses this option and causes further radiosensitization. The results suggest that Polθ inhibition may be exploited to maximize talazoparib radiosensitization of HR-proficient tumors in the clinic.