Erica Lin

Dr. Erica Lin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAnna Astashchanka
Anna Astashchanka
JRJoseph Ryan
Joseph Ryan
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
BNBrandon Nokes
Brandon Nokes
CJCatriona Jamieson
Catriona Jamieson
JJJisha Joshua
Jisha Joshua
Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are becoming more widespread as a result of optimization of conditioning regimens and prevention of short-term complications with prophylactic antibiotics and antifungals. However, pulmonary complications post-HSCT remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality and are a challenge to clinicians in both diagnosis and treatment. This comprehensive review provides a primer for non-pulmonary healthcare providers, synthesizing the current evidence behind common infectious and non-infectious post-transplant pulmonary complications based on time (peri-engraftment, early post-transplantation, and late post-transplantation). Utilizing the combination of timing of presentation, clinical symptoms, histopathology, and radiographic findings should increase rates of early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication of these severe illness states.

1 December 2021 in American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IIIbrahim Ibrahim
Ibrahim Ibrahim
JMJorge A. Masso-Silva
Jorge A. Masso-Silva
AMAnkita Mittal
Ankita Mittal
APArjun Patel
Arjun Patel
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
LALaura E Crotty Alexander
Laura E Crotty Alexander
Over 40 million people use e-cigarettes worldwide, but the impact of chronic e-cigarette use on health has not been adequately defined. In particular, effects of e-cigarette aerosol inhalation on inflammation and host defenses across the body are not fully understood. We conducted a longitudinal cohort pilot study to explore changes in the inflammatory state and monocyte function of e-cigarette users (n = 20) versus healthy controls (n = 13) and to evaluate effects of e-cigarette use reduction on the same. Saliva, sputum, and blood were obtained from e-cigarette users at baseline and after a 2-wk intervention of decreased e-cigarette use. Overall, across 38 proteins quantified by multiplex, airway samples from e-cigarette users tended to have decreased levels of immunomodulatory proteins relative to healthy controls, whereas levels of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in the circulation tended to be elevated. Specifically, e-cigarette users had lower levels of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) in saliva (P < 0.0001), with higher IL-1Ra and growth-regulated oncogene (GRO) levels in sputum (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), and higher levels of both TNFβ (P < 0.0001) and VEGF (P < 0.0001) in plasma. Circulating monocytes from e-cigarette users had alterations in their inflammatory phenotype in response to reduced e-cigarette use, with blunted IL-8 and IL-6 release upon challenge with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively), suggesting a decreased ability to appropriately respond to bacterial infection. Based on these findings, chronic inhalation of e-cigarette aerosols alters the inflammatory state of the airways and systemic circulation, raising concern for the development of both inflammatory and infectious diseases in chronic users of e-cigarettes.

29 October 2021 in ATS Scholar
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
AYAlan X. You
Alan X. You
GWGabriel Wardi
Gabriel Wardi
Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted medical education for trainees of all levels. Although telesimulation was initially used to train in resource-limited environments, it may be a reasonable alternative for replicating authentic patient experiences for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear whether a more passive approach through telesimulation training is as effective as traditional in-person simulation training. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of in-person versus remote simulation training on learners’ comfort with managing critical care scenarios. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study assessing the impact of an in-person versus remote simulation course on volunteer fourth-year medical students from February to April 2021 at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine. Precourse and postcourse surveys were performed anonymously using an online secure resource. Results: In the in-person learners, there was statistically significant improvement in learner comfort across all technical, behavioral, and cognitive domains. In remote learners, there was a trend toward improvement in self-reported comfort across technical and cognitive domains in the telesimulation course. However, the only statistically significant improvement in postcourse surveys of telesimulation learners, compared with baseline, was in running codes. Regardless of the training modality, the students had a positive experience with the critical care simulation course, ranking it, on average, 9.6 out of 10 (9.9 in in-person simulation vs. 9.3 in telesimulation; P = 0.06). Conclusion: We demonstrated that implementation of a telesimulation-based simulation course focusing on critical care cases is feasible and well received by trainees. Although a telesimulation-based simulation course may not be as effective for remote learners as active in-person participants, our study provided evidence that there was still a trend toward improving provider readiness across technical and cognitive domains when approaching critical care cases.

1 December 2025 in ATS Scholar
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HPHitesh H. Patel
Hitesh H. Patel
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
Medical education is redefining clinical excellence in the face of high learner (medical student and house staff) burnout rates, exposing a dichotomy between clinical rigor and well-being. Endurance-based traditions that once equated long hours with competence persist, yet contemporary evidence shows that effective learning environments, grounded in psychological safety and timely bidirectional feedback, improve both performance and well-being. Through the lens of early career clinician educators, we trace the origins of hardship-driven training, review data linking burnout to impaired clinical performance, and describe how competency-based medical education, anchored in entrustable professional activities and qualitative milestones, shifts success metrics from hours logged to skills demonstrated. We explore generational shifts that intensify the need for transparent discussions of expectations between learners and educators. We advocate for a culture in which mistakes are viewed as learning opportunities rather than failures. Finally, we argue that educational reforms must undergo rigorous, longitudinal evaluation before widespread implementation to ensure that they enhance competence, reduce burnout, and maximize patient safety. Clarifying which stressors cultivate mastery and which merely exhaust will allow us to produce physicians who learn more effectively, care for patients more safely, and remain in the profession longer. By cocreating psychologically safe, data-driven training models that retain “necessary discomforts” while eliminating “unnecessary harms,” medical education can reconcile its dual obligations to clinical excellence and learner well-being.

1 March 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
AFAna Lucia Fuentes
Ana Lucia Fuentes
APArjun Patel
Arjun Patel
LALaura E Crotty Alexander
Laura E Crotty Alexander

28 April 2022 in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELErica Lin
Erica Lin
GYGordon Yung
Gordon Yung