Objectives To compare the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) with that of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and determine drug persistence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods We analysed data from patients included in BIOBADASER 3.0 and treated with JAKi or TNFi from 2015 to 2023 and estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of adverse events and persistence. Results A total of 6826 patients were included. Of these, 52% had RA, 25% psoriatic arthritis and 23% axial SpA. Treatment was with TNFi in 86%. The mean duration of treatment was 2.2±2.0 years with TNFi versus 1.8±1.5 with JAKi. JAKis were prescribed in older patients with longer term disease, greater comorbidity and later treatment lines and more frequently as monotherapy. The IRR of all infections and gastrointestinal events was higher among patients with RA treated with JAKi. Drug persistence at 1, 2 and 3 years was 69%, 55% and 45% for TNFi and 68%, 54% and 45% for JAKi. Multivariate regression models showed a lower probability of discontinuation for JAKi (HR=0.85; 95% CI 0.78–0.92) and concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (HR=0.90; 95% CI 0.84–0.96). The risk of discontinuation increased with glucocorticoids, comorbidities, greater disease activity and later treatment lines. Conclusions Infections, herpes zoster and gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with RA tended to be more frequent with JAKi. However, prognosis was poor in patients receiving JAKi. Persistence was similar for TNFi and JAKi, although factors associated with discontinuation differed by diagnostic group.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is regarded as a prototype autoimmune disease because it can serve as a means for studying differences between ethnic minorities and sex. Traditionally, all Hispanics have been bracketed within the same ethnic group, but there are differences between Hispanics from Spain and those from Latin America, not to mention other Spanish-speaking populations. This study aimed to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics, severity, activity, damage, mortality and co-morbidity of SLE in Hispanics belonging to the two ethnic groups resident in Spain, and to identify any differences. This was an observational, multi-centre, retrospective study. The demographic and clinical variables of patients with SLE from 45 rheumatology units were collected. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Hispanic patients from the registry were divided into two groups: Spaniards or European Caucasians (EC) and Latin American mestizos (LAM). Comparative univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out. A total of 3490 SLE patients were included, 90% of whom were female; 3305 (92%) EC and 185 (5%) LAM. LAM patients experienced their first lupus symptoms four years earlier than EC patients and were diagnosed and included in the registry younger, and their SLE was of a shorter duration. The time in months from the first SLE symptoms to diagnosis was longer in EC patients, as were the follow-up periods. LAM patients exhibited higher prevalence rates of myositis, haemolytic anaemia and nephritis, but there were no differences in histological type or serositis. Anti-Sm, anti-Ro and anti-RNP antibodies were more frequently found in LAM patients. LAM patients also had higher levels of disease activity, severity and hospital admissions. However, there were no differences in damage index, mortality or co-morbidity index. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, in several models the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for a Katz severity index >3 in LAM patients was 1.45 (1.038–2.026; p = 0.02). This difference did not extend to activity levels (i.e. SLEDAI >3; 0.98 (0.30–1.66)). SLE in Hispanic EC patients showed clinical differences compared to Hispanic LAM patients. The latter more frequently suffered nephritis and higher severity indices. This study shows that where lupus is concerned, not all Hispanics are equal.

Introduction: No definitive data are available regarding the value of switching to an alternative TNF antagonist in rheumatoid arthritis patients who fail to respond to the first one. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment response in a clinical setting based on HAQ improvement and EULAR response criteria in RA patients who were switched to a second or a third TNF antagonist due to failure with the first one. Methods: This was an observational, prospective study of a cohort of 417 RA patients treated with TNF antagonists in three university hospitals in Spain between January 1999 and December 2005. A database was created at the participating centres, with well-defined operational instructions. The main outcome variables were analyzed using parametric or non-parametric tests depending on the level of measurement and distribution of each variable. Results: Mean (± SD) DAS-28 on starting the first, second and third TNF antagonist was 5.9 (± 2.0), 5.1 (± 1.5) and 6.1 (± 1.1). At the end of follow-up, it decreased to 3.3 (± 1.6; Δ = -2.6; p > 0.0001), 4.2 (± 1.5; Δ = -1.1; p = 0.0001) and 5.4 (± 1.7; Δ = -0.7; p = 0.06). For the first TNF antagonist, DAS-28-based EULAR response level was good in 42% and moderate in 33% of patients. The second TNF antagonist yielded a good response in 20% and no response in 53% of patients, while the third one yielded a good response in 28% and no response in 72%. Mean baseline HAQ on starting the first, second and third TNF antagonist was 1.61, 1.52 and 1.87, respectively. At the end of follow-up, it decreased to 1.12 (Δ = -0.49; p < 0.0001), 1.31 (Δ = -0.21, p = 0.004) and 1.75 (Δ = -0.12; p = 0.1), respectively. Sixty four percent of patients had a clinically important improvement in HAQ (defined as ≥ -0.22) with the first TNF antagonist and 46% with the second. Conclusion: A clinically significant effect size was seen in less than half of RA patients cycling to a second TNF antagonist.

Introduction Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to investigate patients’ characteristics, prescription patterns, effectiveness, and treatment persistence in patients receiving baricitinib in real-world practice in Spain. Methods This retrospective longitudinal cohort study conducted in five rheumatology units included adults with RA initiating baricitinib (Sep-2017–May-19) with at least a 6-month-follow-up. Demographic/clinical characteristics, prescription patterns, and changes in disease activity and pain level were collected until treatment discontinuation/end of follow-up. Treatment persistence was estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods. Results Data from 182 patients were included (mean (SD)): 83.5% women, 62.2 (12.3) years, body mass index 26.8 (5.1), disease duration 13.2 (10.8) years and Charlson Comorbidity Index score 2.4 (2.0). All patients had received at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) before starting baricitinib and 78.0% at least one biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD). Furthermore, 90.1% started with baricitinib 4 mg/day; 43.4% in monotherapy. One hundred and twelve (61.5%) of patients continued baricitinib at data collection time; mean persistence was 14.1 (0.5) months. Overall treatment persistence was 79.7/64.8/59.1% at 6/12/18 months. Seventy (38.5%) patients discontinued baricitinib during follow-up due to loss of efficacy (68.6%) or adverse events (18.6%). In those patients with available scores at the different observed cut-off points, remission or low disease activity was reported in 71.6 and 76.3% of patients at 6/12 months at any index: Disease Activity Score 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) (73.1 and 73.5%), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) (62.4 and 75.0%), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (66.7 and 78.1%). Good or moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-response was noted in 80.0 and 78.2% of patients, respectively. Improvement from baseline in pain (Visual Analog Scale) was 2.5 cm and 3.0 cm at 6/12 months, respectively. Conclusions This Spanish cohort of patients treated with baricitinib had a long-standing and refractory disease. Nevertheless, high persistence and improvements in disease activity and pain were found at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation, independently of the composite disease activity measure used, reinforcing the effectiveness of baricitinib in routine clinical practice.

Diet is considered a possible cofactor, which affects the immune system and potentially causes dysregulation of intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. This study aimed to review the quality of evidence on the effects of specific diet composition on symptoms of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis, multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [remission maintenance of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis], psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients. We conducted a review of meta-analyses and Cochrane systematic reviews using PubMed and EMBASE, from inception to September 2024, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of the meta-analyses was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 rating system. Three Cochrane systematic reviews and eight meta-analyses were evaluated. Some specific composition diets have been shown to reduce the symptoms of RA, IBD, and MS and improve activity parameters in IBD and RA, with critically low or low levels of evidence. The reduction in inflammatory biomarker levels is unclear. This review summarizes the global evidence for specific dietary interventions, mostly with anti-inflammatory properties due to their components, to improve IMID symptoms, clarifying the weaknesses of clinical trials and dietary meta-analyses with critically low or low levels of evidence; and shows the need to use indices such as the Dietary Inflammatory Index, which allows diets to be classified by their pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory food content, to better compare diet groups in clinical trials. The difficulty of obtaining high-level evidence from dietary studies is apparent and may delay the application of the results. Clinicians should be aware of the role of diets with anti-inflammatory properties as a complement to pharmacological treatments in IMIDs.

Background: We aimed to analyse the effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of initial treatment with biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Qualitative study. A group of RA experts was selected. A scoping review in Medline was conducted to analyse the evidence of initial RA treatment with biological therapies. Randomised clinical trials were selected. Two reviewers analysed the articles and compiled the data, whose quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. The experts discussed the review’s findings and generated a series of general principles: Results: Seventeen studies were included. Most of the included patients were middle-aged women with early RA (1–7 months) and multiple poor prognostic factors. Initial treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors combined with methotrexate (MTX) and an IL6R inhibitor (either in mono or combination therapy) is effective (activity, function, radiographic damage, quality of life), safe, and superior to MTX monotherapy in the short and medium term. In the long term, patients who received initial treatment with biologicals presented better results than those whose initial therapy was with MTX. Conclusions: Initial treatment of RA with biological therapies is effective, efficient, and safe in the short, medium, and long term, particularly for patients with poor prognostic factors.