Fernando Rojas

Dr. Fernando Rojas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ignacio RojasIgnacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas
OVOlga Valenzuela
Olga Valenzuela
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas
Alberto GuillénAlberto Guillén
Alberto Guillén
LHLuis Javier Herrera
Luis Javier Herrera
Miguel PasadasMiguel Pasadas
Miguel Pasadas

1 April 2008 in Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OVOlga Valenzuela
Olga Valenzuela
Ignacio RojasIgnacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas
HPHector Pomares
Hector Pomares
LHLuis Javier Herrera
Luis Javier Herrera
Miguel PasadasMiguel Pasadas
Miguel Pasadas

25 July 2012 in Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Oresti BanosOresti Banos
Oresti Banos
Miguel Damas HermosoMiguel Damas Hermoso
Miguel Damas Hermoso
HPHector Pomares
Hector Pomares
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas
BDBlanca Delgado-Marquez
Blanca Delgado-Marquez
OVOlga Valenzuela
Olga Valenzuela

21 November 2017 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniel Castillo
Daniel Castillo
Juan Manuel GálvezJuan Manuel Gálvez
Juan Manuel Gálvez
LHLuis Javier Herrera
Luis Javier Herrera
BRBelén San Román
Belén San Román
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas
Ignacio RojasIgnacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas
Nowadays, many public repositories containing large microarray gene expression datasets are available. However, the problem lies in the fact that microarray technology are less powerful and accurate than more recent Next Generation Sequencing technologies, such as RNA-Seq. In any case, information from microarrays is truthful and robust, thus it can be exploited through the integration of microarray data with RNA-Seq data. Additionally, information extraction and acquisition of large number of samples in RNA-Seq still entails very high costs in terms of time and computational resources.This paper proposes a new model to find the gene signature of breast cancer cell lines through the integration of heterogeneous data from different breast cancer datasets, obtained from microarray and RNA-Seq technologies. Consequently, data integration is expected to provide a more robust statistical significance to the results obtained. Finally, a classification method is proposed in order to test the robustness of the Differentially Expressed Genes when unseen data is presented for diagnosis. The proposed data integration allows analyzing gene expression samples coming from different technologies. The most significant genes of the whole integrated data were obtained through the intersection of the three gene sets, corresponding to the identified expressed genes within the microarray data itself, within the RNA-Seq data itself, and within the integrated data from both technologies. This intersection reveals 98 possible technology-independent biomarkers. Two different heterogeneous datasets were distinguished for the classification tasks: a training dataset for gene expression identification and classifier validation, and a test dataset with unseen data for testing the classifier. Both of them achieved great classification accuracies, therefore confirming the validity of the obtained set of genes as possible biomarkers for breast cancer. Through a feature selection process, a final small subset made up by six genes was considered for breast cancer diagnosis. This work proposes a novel data integration stage in the traditional gene expression analysis pipeline through the combination of heterogeneous data from microarrays and RNA-Seq technologies. Available samples have been successfully classified using a subset of six genes obtained by a feature selection method. Consequently, a new classification and diagnosis tool was built and its performance was validated using previously unseen samples.

21 June 2013 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Francisco OrtuñoFrancisco Ortuño
Francisco Ortuño
OVOlga Valenzuela
Olga Valenzuela
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas
HPHector Pomares
Hector Pomares
JFJavier P. Florido
Javier P. Florido
Ignacio RojasIgnacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas
Motivation: Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are widely used approaches in bioinformatics to carry out other tasks such as structure predictions, biological function analyses or phylogenetic modeling. However, current tools usually provide partially optimal alignments, as each one is focused on specific biological features. Thus, the same set of sequences can produce different alignments, above all when sequences are less similar. Consequently, researchers and biologists do not agree about which is the most suitable way to evaluate MSAs. Recent evaluations tend to use more complex scores including further biological features. Among them, 3D structures are increasingly being used to evaluate alignments. Because structures are more conserved in proteins than sequences, scores with structural information are better suited to evaluate more distant relationships between sequences.

1 January 2007 in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jesus GonzálezJesus González
Jesus González
Ignacio RojasIgnacio Rojas
Ignacio Rojas
HPHector Pomares
Hector Pomares
LHLuis Javier Herrera
Luis Javier Herrera
Alberto GuillénAlberto Guillén
Alberto Guillén
FRFernando Rojas
Fernando Rojas