Electronegativity is a key property of the elements. Being useful in rationalizing stability, structure and properties of molecules and solids, it has shaped much of the thinking in the fields of structural chemistry and solid state chemistry and physics. There are many definitions of electronegativity, which can be roughly classified as either spectroscopic (these are defined for isolated atoms) or thermochemical (characterizing bond energies and heats of formation of compounds). The most widely used is the thermochemical Pauling’s scale, where electronegativities have units of eV1/2. Here we identify drawbacks in the definition of Pauling’s electronegativity scale—and, correcting them, arrive at our thermochemical scale, where electronegativities are dimensionless numbers. Our scale displays intuitively correct trends for the 118 elements and leads to an improved description of chemical bonding (e.g., bond polarity) and thermochemistry.
24 April 2020 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Abinit is a widely used scientific software package implementing density functional theory and many related functionalities for excited states and response properties. This paper presents the novel features and capabilities, both technical and scientific, which have been implemented over the past 5 years. This evolution occurred in the context of evolving hardware platforms, high-throughput calculation campaigns, and the growing use of machine learning to predict properties based on databases of first-principle results. We present new methodologies for ground states with constrained charge, spin, or temperature; for density functional perturbation theory extensions to flexoelectricity and polarons; and for excited states in many-body frameworks including GW, dynamical mean field theory, and coupled cluster. Technical advances have extended Abinit high-performance execution to graphical processing units and intensive parallelism. Second-principles methods build effective models on top of first-principle results to scale up in length and time scales. Finally, workflows have been developed in different community frameworks to automate Abinit calculations and enable users to simulate hundreds or thousands of materials in controlled and reproducible conditions.
We propose a machine-learning interatomic potential for multi-component magnetic materials. In this potential we consider magnetic moments as degrees of freedom (features) along with atomic positions, atomic types, and lattice vectors. We create a training set with constrained DFT (cDFT) that allows us to calculate energies of configurations with non-equilibrium (excited) magnetic moments and, thus, it is possible to construct the training set in a wide configuration space with great variety of non-equilibrium atomic positions, magnetic moments, and lattice vectors. Such a training set makes possible to fit reliable potentials that will allow us to predict properties of configurations in the excited states (including the ones with non-equilibrium magnetic moments). We verify the trained potentials on the system of bcc Fe–Al with different concentrations of Al and Fe and different ways Al and Fe atoms occupy the supercell sites. Here, we show that the formation energies, the equilibrium lattice parameters, and the total magnetic moments of the unit cell for different Fe–Al structures calculated with machine-learning potentials are in good correspondence with the ones obtained with DFT. We also demonstrate that the theoretical calculations conducted in this study qualitatively reproduce the experimentally-observed anomalous volume-composition dependence in the Fe–Al system.