In November 2022, OpenAI released a chatbot named ChatGPT, a product capable of processing natural language to create human-like conversational dialogue. It has generated a lot of interest, including from the scientific community and the medical science community. Recent publications have shown that ChatGPT can correctly answer questions from medical exams such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination and other specialty exams. To date, there have been no studies in which ChatGPT has been tested on specialty questions in the field of nephrology anywhere in the world. Using the ChatGPT-3.5 and -4.0 algorithms in this comparative cross-sectional study, we analysed 1560 single-answer questions from the national specialty exam in nephrology from 2017 to 2023 that were available in the Polish Medical Examination Center's question database along with answer keys. Of the 1556 questions posed to ChatGPT-4.0, correct answers were obtained with an accuracy of 69.84%, compared with ChatGPT-3.5 (45.70%, P = .0001) and with the top results of medical doctors (85.73%, P = .0001). Of the 13 tests, ChatGPT-4.0 exceeded the required ≥60% pass rate in 11 tests passed, and scored higher than the average of the human exam results. ChatGPT-3.5 was not spectacularly successful in nephrology exams. The ChatGPT-4.0 algorithm was able to pass most of the analysed nephrology specialty exams. New generations of ChatGPT achieve similar results to humans. The best results of humans are better than those of ChatGPT-4.0.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether routine blood tests and clinical characteristics can predict in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. Clinical data of 285 patients aged 59.7 ± 10.3 yrs. (males n = 189, females n = 96) were retrospectively collected from December 2020 to June 2021. Routine blood tests were recorded within the 1st hour of admission to hospital. The inflammatory variables, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophils–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the systemic inflammatory index (SII), exceeded the reference values in all patients and were significantly higher in deceased patients (n = 108) compared to survivors (n = 177). The log-rank test for comparing two survival curves showed that patients aged ≥60.5 years, with PCT ≥ 0.188 ng/mL or NLR ≥ 11.57 10³/µL were at a greater risk of death. NLR demonstrated a high impact on the COVID-19 mortality (HR 1.317; 95%CI 1.004–1.728; p < 0.05), whereas CRP and SII showed no effect (HR 1.000; 95%CI 1.000–1.004; p = 0.085 and HR 1.078; 95%CI 0.865–1.344; p = 0.503, respectively). In the first Polish study including COVID-19 patients, we demonstrated that age in relation to simple parameters derived from complete blood cell count has prognostic implications in the course of COVID-19 and can identify the patients at a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Urolithiasis can affect all children even preschool ones. Diagnostic difficulties in the youngest children are due to the problems in locating pain and determining its character and severity. In keeping with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) protocol, the number of imaging tests possible to perform is very limited. Ultrasound is the first line exam of choice. After diagnosis of the presence of a stone, ESWL (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotrypsy) should always be considered and offered to parents due to its high effectiveness and minimal invasiveness. If ESWL is contraindicated or not well-accepted by parents, authors suggest another minimal invasive approach: URS-L (Uretherorenoscopy–Lithotrypsy). Our study clinically analyzes 87 children, which were treated between 2009 and 2017 using the URS-L procedure. URS-L treatments were performed using Lithoclast until 2009, and after that time, using the holmium laser Ho:YAG. The overall effectiveness of treatments was 93.3%. There was no failure in the access to the stones. A macroscopic hematuria (Clavien-Dindo I grade) was observed through the second post-operative day in 9.2% of treated patients. No urosepsis was observed. Full metabolic evaluation was performed on all patients. Children remained under constant urological and nephrological observation. A recurrence of urolithiasis was observed in 35.6% of the cases. Treating ureteral lithiasis in young infants remains a big challenge. Our series shows that modern minimal invasive techniques used by very experienced pediatric urologists in high volume centers gives excellent results. In most cases, surgery should no longer need to be an option.

Background: The effect of renal replacement therapy on drug concentrations in patients with sepsis has not been fully elucidated because the pharmacokinetic properties of many antimicrobials are influenced by both pathophysiological and treatment-related factors. The aim of this study was to determine meropenem concentrations in patients with sepsis before and after the initiation of continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-CVVHD). Methods: The study included 15 critically ill patients undergoing RCA-CVVHD due to sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. All participants received 2 g of meropenem every 8 h in a prolonged infusion lasting 3 h. Meropenem concentrations were measured in blood plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Blood samples were obtained at six-time points prior to and at six-time points after introducing RCA-CVVHD. Results: The median APACHE IV and SOFA scores on admission were 118 points (interquartile range [IQR] 97–134 points) and 19.5 points (IQR 18–21 points), respectively. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentrations of meropenem measured directly before RCA-CVVHD and during the first 450 min of the procedure. The drug concentration reached its peak 2 h after initiating the infusion and then steadily declined. Conclusions: The concentration of high-dose meropenem (2 g every 8 h) administered in a prolonged infusion was similar before and after the introduction of RCA-CVVHD in patients with sepsis who developed acute kidney injury.

Background/Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 was responsible for the global pandemic. Approximately 10–15% of patients with COVID-19 developed respiratory failure with adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which required treatment in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 was frequently handled with steroids. Synergically, tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, gained popularity as a cytokine storm-suppressing agent. However, immunosuppression was proven to increase the predisposition to infections with resistant bacteria. Our study aimed to assess the relationship between positive tests for secondary infections and the survival of patients with severe COVID-19-attributed ARDS treated with immunosuppressive agents. Methods: This study included 342 patients qualified for the ICU and mechanical ventilation (MV). The patients were divided based on the type of immunomodulating therapy and the culture tests results. Results: The results showed the highest survival rate among patients <61 years, favoring the combined treatment (tocilizumab + steroids). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) correlated with a lower survival rate than other comorbidities. Tocilizumab was associated with an increased risk of positive pathogen cultures, which could potentially cause secondary infections; however, the survival rate among these patients was higher. Conclusions: MV and ICU procedures as well as the application of tocilizumab significantly decreased the mortality rate in patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS. The suppression of cytokine storms played a crucial role in survival. Tocilizumab was found to be both efficient and safe despite the ‘side effect’ of the increased risk of positive results for secondary infections.