Explore full metrics on Scilit
(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)
<mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Gly</mml:mi><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mi>BTA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>(Gly–H2O2–BTA) , and different types of composite A (silane coupling agents between the polymer core and the silica shell) and B (electrostatic attraction between the polymer core and the silica shell) abrasives, are presented. While the presence of BTA allows a 10-fold reduction in the static etch rate from <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mtext>to</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>nm</mml:mi><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>95to10nm∕min , combining an oxidizer and complexing agent leads to removal rates higher than <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>400</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>nm</mml:mi><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>400nm∕min . Different surface morphology and root-mean-square (rms) roughness are observed after polishing with composite abrasives combined with different peroxide concentrations. Oxidizer concentrations as low as <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>vol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>0.1vol% lead to a high nonuniformity and defectivity values. In particular, at pH <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>∼6 , composite B performs better than pure colloidal silica during copper CMP using the IC-1000 pad, giving a comparable material removal rate (MRR), but a better surface finish due to the contribution of the elasticity of the polymer in gently transferring the applied load to the wafer surface. Cu CMP with pure polymer particles is a promising alternative to the hard inorganic material, especially if combined with suitable surfactants that act from both particle stabilization and friction reduction/lubrication improvement perspectives. The use of a medium/high-hardness pad IC-1000 is compared to the use of a soft Politex pad. In the former case, differences in terms of MRR, rms roughness, and total defects are observed between the composite abrasives A and B; in the latter case, the behavior of the two composites is similar. In the case of a soft pad in combination with composite abrasives, there is a remarkable improvement in the defectivity without any loss in MRR.<mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>5μm width and high aspect ratio (HAR) as high as 8:1. The conformal wet seed layer enables the achievement of a successful void-free filling using an in-house made acidic Cu bath with model additives (SPS, PEG, and JGB).No biography provided yet