Aditya Shreenivas

Dr. Aditya Shreenivas


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2023 in npj Precision Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAditya Shreenivas
Aditya Shreenivas
FJFilip Janku
Filip Janku
MGMohamed Alaa Gouda
Mohamed Alaa Gouda
HCHui-Zi Chen
Hui-Zi Chen
BGBen George
Ben George
RKRazelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations (activating mutations, amplifications, and fusions/rearrangements) occur in ~3.3% of cancers.ALKfusions/rearrangements are discerned in >50% of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs), but only in ~0.2% of other cancers outside of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a rate that may be below the viability threshold of even large-scale treatment trials. Five ALK inhibitors –alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinb, crizotinib, and lorlatinib—are FDA approved forALK-aberrant NSCLCs, and crizotinib is also approved forALK-aberrant IMTs and ALCL, including in children. Herein, we review the pharmacologic tractability ofALKalterations, focusing beyond NSCLC. Importantly, the hallmark of approved indications is the presence ofALKfusions/rearrangements, and response rates of ~50–85%. Moreover, there are numerous reports of ALK inhibitor activity in multiple solid and hematologic tumors (e.g., histiocytosis, leiomyosarcoma, lymphoma, myeloma, and colorectal, neuroendocrine, ovarian, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancer) bearingALKfusions/rearrangements. Many reports used crizotinib or alectinib, but each of the approved ALK inhibitors have shown activity. ALK inhibitor activity is also seen in neuroblastoma, which bearALKmutations (rather than fusions/rearrangements), but response rates are lower (~10–20%). Current data suggests that ALK inhibitors have tissue-agnostic activity in neoplasms bearingALKfusions/rearrangements.

23 February 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OAObada Ababneh
Obada Ababneh
AGAlina Ghazou
Alina Ghazou
MAMohmmad Alawajneh
Mohmmad Alawajneh
SMSaleh Alhaj Mohammad
Saleh Alhaj Mohammad
Abdullah Bani-HaniAbdullah Bani-Hani
Abdullah Bani-Hani
ASAditya Shreenivas
Aditya Shreenivas
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of different malignancies. However, their efficacy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) remains uncertain. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of ICIs in patients with advanced ACC. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL for studies that used ICIs in ACC. Studies with more than five patients were included in the meta-analysis of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Twenty studies with 23 treatment arms and 250 patients were included. Single-agent anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment was utilized in 13 treatment arms, whereas an anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 combination was used in 4 treatment arms. Other anti-PD1- or anti-PD-L1-based combinations were used in five treatment arms. The ORR was 14% (95% CI = 10–19%, I2 = 0%), and the DCR was 43% (95% CI = 37–50%, I2 = 13%). The combination anti-PD1- or anti-PD-L1-based treatment strategies did not correlate with higher responses compared with monotherapy. The median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI = 7.85–23.05), and the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI = 1.8–5.4). ICIs have a modest efficacy in advanced ACC but a good OS. Further studies are needed to investigate predictive biomarkers for ICI response and to compare ICI-based strategies with the current standard of care.

27 April 2023 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STStephen K. Tahir
Stephen K. Tahir
ECEmiliano Calvo
Emiliano Calvo
Benedito A CarneiroBenedito A Carneiro
Benedito A Carneiro
JYJunichiro Yuda
Junichiro Yuda
ASAditya Shreenivas
Aditya Shreenivas
DPDarren C. Phillips
Darren C. Phillips
Activation of apoptosis in malignant cells is an established strategy for controlling cancer and is potentially curative. To assess the impact of concurrently inducing the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we evaluated activity of the TRAIL receptor agonistic fusion protein eftozanermin alfa (eftoza; ABBV-621) in combination with the B-cell lymphoma protein-2 selective inhibitor venetoclax in preclinical models and human patients. Simultaneously stimulating intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways with venetoclax and eftoza, respectively, enhanced their activities in AML cell lines and patient-derived ex vivo/in vivo models. Eftoza activity alone or plus venetoclax required death receptor 4/5 (DR4/DR5) expression on the plasma membrane but was independent of TP53 or FLT3-ITD status. The safety/tolerability of eftoza as monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax was demonstrated in patients with relapsed/refractory AML in a phase 1 clinical trial. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 2 of 4 (50%) patients treated with eftoza monotherapy and 18 of 23 (78%) treated with eftoza plus venetoclax. An overall response rate of 30% (7/23; 4 complete responses [CRs], 2 CRs with incomplete hematologic recovery, and 1 morphologic leukemia-free state) was reported in patients who received treatment with eftoza plus venetoclax and 67% (4/6) in patients with myoblasts positive for DR4/DR5 expression; no tumor responses were observed with eftoza monotherapy. These data indicate that combination therapy with eftoza plus venetoclax to simultaneously activate the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis-signaling pathways may improve clinical benefit compared with venetoclax monotherapy in relapsed/refractory AML with an acceptable toxicity profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03082209.

29 January 2021 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHardik Sheth
Hardik Sheth
RPRamya Pragya
Ramya Pragya
SKShama Kovale
Shama Kovale
MDMandar Deshpande
Mandar Deshpande
RMRajesh Mistry
Rajesh Mistry
SLSewanti Limaye
Sewanti Limaye

2 April 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrew Gaya
Andrew Gaya
NRNitesh Rohatgi
Nitesh Rohatgi
SLSewanti Limaye
Sewanti Limaye
ASAditya Shreenivas
Aditya Shreenivas
RARamin Ajami
Ramin Ajami
DPDarshana Patil
Darshana Patil
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have historically been used for prognostication in oncology. We evaluate the performance of liquid biopsy CTC assay as a diagnostic tool in suspected pancreaticobiliary cancers (PBC). The assay utilizes functional enrichment of CTCs followed by immunofluorescent profiling of organ-specific markers. The performance of the assay was first evaluated in a multicentric case-control study of blood samples from 360 participants, including 188 PBC cases (pre-biopsy samples) and 172 healthy individuals. A subsequent prospective observational study included pre-biopsy blood samples from 88 individuals with suspicion of PBC and no prior diagnosis of cancer. CTCs were harvested using a unique functional enrichment method and used for immunofluorescent profiling for CA19.9, Maspin, EpCAM, CK, and CD45, blinded to the tissue histopathological diagnosis. TruBlood® malignant or non-malignant predictions were compared with tissue diagnoses to establish sensitivity and specificity. The test had 95.9% overall sensitivity (95% CI: 86.0–99.5%) and 92.3% specificity (95% CI: 79.13% to 98.38%) to differentiate PBC (n = 49) from benign conditions (n = 39). The high accuracy of the CTC-based TruBlood test demonstrates its potential clinical application as a diagnostic tool to assist the effective detection of PBC when tissue sampling is unviable or inconclusive.

28 April 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMThomas Matoska
Thomas Matoska
Anjishnu BanerjeeAnjishnu Banerjee
Anjishnu Banerjee
ASAditya Shreenivas
Aditya Shreenivas
LJLauren Jurkowski
Lauren Jurkowski
MSMonica E Shukla
Monica E Shukla
LPLindsay Puckett
Lindsay Puckett
Background: The study of oligometastatic esophageal cancer (EC) is relatively new. Preliminary data suggests that more aggressive treatment regimens in select patients may improve survival rates in oligometastatic EC. However, the consensus recommends palliative treatment. We hypothesized that oligometastatic esophageal cancer patients treated with a definitive approach (chemoradiotherapy [CRT]) would have improved overall survival (OS) compared to those treated with a purely palliative intent and historical controls. Methods: Patients diagnosed with synchronous oligometastatic (any histology, ≤5 metastatic foci) esophageal cancer treated in a single academic hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into definitive and palliative treatment groups. Definitive CRT was defined as radiation therapy to the primary site with ≥40 Gy and ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: Of 78 Stage IVB (AJCC 8th ed.) patients, 36 met the pre-specified oligometastatic definition. Of these, 19 received definitive CRT, and 17 received palliative treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.5 months (Range: 2.3–95.0 months), median OS for definitive CRT and palliative groups were 90.2 and 8.1 months (p < 0.01), translating into 5-year OS of 50.5% (95%CI: 32.0–79.8%) vs. 7.5% (95%CI: 1.7–48.9%), respectively. Conclusions: Oligometastatic EC patients treated with definitive CRT benefited from that approach with survival rates (50.5%) that vastly exceeded historical standards of 5% at 5 years for metastatic EC. Oligometastatic EC patients treated with definitive CRT had significantly improved OS compared to those treated with palliative-only intent within our cohort. Notably, definitively treated patients were generally younger and with better performance status versus those palliatively treated. Further prospective evaluation of definitive CRT for oligometastatic EC is warranted.