Extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are lethal cancers with limited treatment options. Identification of contributing factors to the observed heterogeneity of clinical outcomes within the EP-NEC family is warranted, to enable identification of effective treatments. A multicentre retrospective study investigated potential differences in “real-world” treatment/survival outcomes between small-cell (SC) versus (vs.) non-SC EP-NECs. One-hundred and seventy patients were included: 77 (45.3%) had SC EP-NECs and 93 (54.7%) had non-SC EP-NECs. Compared to the SC subgroup, the non-SC subgroup had the following features: (1) a lower mean Ki-67 index (69.3% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.002); (2) a lower proportion of cases with a Ki-67 index of ≥55% (73.9% vs. 88.7%; p = 0.025); (3) reduced sensitivity to first-line platinum/etoposide (objective response rate: 31.6% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.015; and disease control rate; 59.7% vs. 79.6%, p = 0.027); (4) worse progression-free survival (PFS) (adjusted-HR = 1.615, p = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (adjusted-HR = 1.640, p = 0.015) in the advanced setting. Within the advanced EP-NEC cohort, subgroups according to morphological subtype and Ki-67 index (<55% vs. ≥55%) had significantly different PFS (adjusted-p = 0.021) and OS (adjusted-p = 0.051), with the non-SC subgroup with a Ki-67 index of <55% and non-SC subgroup with a Ki-67 index of ≥55% showing the best and worst outcomes, respectively. To conclude, the morphological subtype of EP-NEC provides complementary information to the Ki-67 index and may aid identification of patients who could benefit from alternative first-line treatment strategies to platinum/etoposide.

Background: Everolimus-induced pneumonitis (EiP) has been poorly studied in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) outside clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of EiP in patients with NENs using real-world data. Methods: Retrospective study of everolimus-treated patients with advanced NENs. Imaging reports were systematically reviewed for the presence of pneumonitis. Clinical features and treatment profiles for EiP were summarized. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the initiation of everolimus to the date of death or last follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 122 patients were included. Median age at start of everolimus was 62 (19-86) years, 62% (76/122) were male, and half were from pancreatic origin (62, 51%). Twenty-eight patients (23%) developed EiP: 82% grade (G)1 or G2, 14% G3 and 4% G4. The median time to EiP was 3.6 (0.8-51) months. Primary tumor site, concurrent lung disease, smoking history, and prior therapies were not associated with the onset of EiP. Patients who developed EiP had longer time on everolimus treatment (median 18 months vs 6 months; P = .0018) and OS (77 months vs 52 months; P = .093). Everolimus-induced pneumonitis was a predictor of improved OS by multivariable analysis (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.82; P = .013). Conclusion: Everolimus-induced pneumonitis in the real-world clinical setting is present in one quarter of patients with NENs receiving everolimus and often occurs early. While risk factors for EiP were not identified, patients with EiP had improved survival.

The standard treatment for localized squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal is definitive chemoradiotherapy. A meta-analysis of published studies conducted by our group showed significantly lower rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival at 3 years among HIV-positive patients. We aimed to compare detailed treatment outcomes between the groups of HIV-positive and -negative patients. We performed a retrospective multicenter study of a comparative cohort of consecutive patients with histologic diagnosis of localized squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients' characteristics and outcomes were compared according to HIV status. The primary end points were time to complete response (CR) and DFS time. From June 2001 to September 2018, a total of 185 patients were included; 43 (30.2%) were HIV positive and 142 (69.8%) were HIV negative. The overall CR rates were 67.4% and 91.5% for HIV-positive and -negative patients, respectively (P < .001). The median follow-up was 47.8 months and the median time to experience CR was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-10.5) for HIV-positive versus 4.89 months (95% CI, 4.54-5.25) for HIV-negative (P < .001) patients. The median DFS times were 79.7 months (95% CI, 56.8-102.6) and 127.9 months (95% CI, 112.6-143.2) for HIV-positive and -negative patients, respectively (P = .02). There was a trend toward greater grade 3/4 toxicity in the HIV-positive group. HIV-positive patients take longer to experience CR and present worse DFS. These findings have clinical implications because waiting longer to define CR among these patients may prevent unnecessary anorectal amputations.

Background: Everolimus at 10 mg daily is approved to treat patients with advanced grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), although it may lead to significant toxicity. Grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events and drug discontinuation occur in approximately one-fourth of cases. However, phase I trials have demonstrated that doses from 5 mg daily efficiently inhibit NET cell signaling. Objectives and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study compared the time to treatment failure (TTF) in patients with NETs who received a mean daily dose of 7–10 mg (higher dose [HD]) or ≤6 mg (lower dose [LD]) of everolimus. Results: Ninety-two patients were included: 74 (80%) in the HD group and 18 (20%) in the LD group. At a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 9.2 months for the HD and 7.2 months for the LD groups (p = 0.85). The TTF did not significantly differ between the LD and the HD groups (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.68–2.25; p = 0.47), even after adjusting for age at treatment initiation, the NET grade, and the treatment line. Conclusion: Everolimus doses from 5 to 6 mg/day seem to be equally as effective as higher doses, but lower doses are potentially associated with less toxicity and lower costs. These findings support validation through a randomized clinical trial.