Background: The diagnosis of CPA relies on the detection of the IgG Aspergillus antibody, which is not freely available, especially in resource-poor settings. Point-of-care tests like LDBio Aspergillus ICT lateral flow assay, evaluated in only a few studies, have shown promising results for the diagnosis of CPA. However, no study has compared the diagnostic performances of LDBio LFA in setting of tuberculosis endemic countries and have compared it with that of IgG Aspergillus. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of LDBio LFA in CPA and compare it with existing the diagnostic algorithm utilising ImmunoCAP IgG Aspergillus. Methods: Serial patients presenting with respiratory symptoms (cough, haemoptysis, fever, etc.) for >4 weeks were screened for eligibility. Relevant investigations, including direct microscopy and culture of respiratory secretions, IgG Aspergillus, chest imaging, etc., were done according to existing algorithm. Serums of all patients were tested by LDBio LFA and IgG Aspergillus (ImmunoCAP Asp IgG) and their diagnostic performances were compared. Results: A total of 174 patients were included in the study with ~66.7% patients having past history of tuberculosis. A diagnosis of CPA was made in 74 (42.5%) of patients. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of LDBio LFA was 67.6% (95% CI: 55.7–78%) and 81% (95% CI: 71.9–88.2%), respectively, which increased to 73.3% (95% CI: 60.3–83.9%) and 83.9% (95% CI: 71.7–92.4%), respectively, in patients with a past history of tuberculosis. The sensitivity and specificity of IgG Aspergillus was 82.4% (95% CI: 71.8–90.3%) and 82% (95% CI: 73.1–89%); 86.7% (95% CI: 75.4–94.1%) and 80.4% (95% CI: 67.6–89.8%), in the whole group and those with past history of tuberculosis, respectively. Conclusions: LDBio LFA is a point-of-care test with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. However, further tests may have to be done to rule-in or rule-out the diagnosis of CPA in the appropriate setting.

The epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFI) is ever evolving. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical, microbiological, susceptibility, and outcome data of IFI in Indian patients to identify determinants of infection and 30-day mortality. Proven and probable/putative IFI (defined according to modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group and AspICU criteria) from April 2017 to December 2018 were evaluated in a prospective observational study. All recruited patients were antifungal naïve (n = 3300). There were 253 episodes of IFI (7.6%) with 134 (52.9%) proven and 119 (47%) probable/putative infections. There were four major clusters of infection: invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 53, 20.9%), cryptococcosis (n = 34, 13.4%), invasive aspergillosis (IA) (n = 103, 40.7%), and mucormycosis (n = 62, 24.5%). The significant risk factors were high particulate efficiency air (HEPA) room admission, ICU admission, prolonged exposure to corticosteroids, diabetes mellitus, chronic liver disease (CLD), acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), coronary arterial disease (CAD), trauma, and multiorgan involvement (p < 0.5; odds ratio: >1). The all-cause 30-day mortality was 43.4% (n = 110). It varied by fungal group: 52.8% (28/53) in IC, 58.8% (20/34) in cryptococcosis, 39.8% (41/103) in IA, and 33.9% (21/62) in mucormycosis. HEPA room, ICU admission for IC; HEPA rooms, diabetes mellitus for cryptococcosis; hematological malignancies, chronic kidney disease (CKD), sepsis, galactomannan antigen index value ≥1 for IA and nodules; and ground glass opacities on radiology for mucormycosis were significant predictors of death (odds ratio >1). High minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for azoles were observed in C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, A. fumigatus, A. flavus, R. arrhizus, R. microsporus, and M. circinelloides. For echinocandin, high MIC values were seen in C. tropicalis, C. guillermondii, C. glabrata, and A. fumigatus. This study highlights the shift in epidemiology and also raises concern of high MICs to azoles among our isolates. It warrants regular surveillance, which can provide the local clinically correlated microbiological data to clinicians and which might aid in guiding patient treatment.

Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antifungals is rising continuously. However, inadequate awareness of diagnostic and treatment guidelines and limited laboratory modalities lead to inappropriate use. This study assessed the impact of an institutional antifungal stewardship program on antifungal use practices and patient outcomes. In the pre-intervention phase, data was collected regarding antifungal therapy among patients with invasive fungal infections. Appropriateness of antifungal prescription was assessed. In the intervention phase, simple algorithms for diagnosis and management of fungal infections were prepared from international guidelines and incorporated into a booklet for distribution. Monthly training sessions were conducted. New serological and molecular tests and therapeutic drug monitoring were introduced. In the post-intervention phase, an antifungal stewardship team was constituted for clinical advisory on demand and ongoing training. Data regarding antifungal therapy was collected and compared with pre-intervention data. Untreated patients decreased from 25% to 18.9% post-intervention (P = .28). Appropriate antifungal use increased from 72.6% to 77.9% (P = .4) among patients with a single fungal infection, and from 57.1% to 88.5% (P = .04) for at least one infection among those with dual fungal infections. 49 incidents of inappropriate use in various categories were seen among 75 patients receiving antifungals pre-intervention, decreasing to 42 incidents among 94 patients post-intervention (P = .06), particularly evident among patients with dual infections (P = .002). Mortality increased from 51% to 75.86% post-intervention (P = .0001). Overall, the small improvement noticed in antifungal usage pattern can still be considered significant, given the limited study period.