6-18F-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) PET is a useful tool in the clinical management of pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). 18F-FDOPA is a large neutral amino acid biochemically resembling endogenous L-DOPA and taken up by the L-type amino acid transporters (LAT1 and LAT2). This study was conducted to examine the expression of the LAT system in PHEO and MTC. Real-time PCR and Western blot analyses were used to assess LAT1 and LAT2 gene and protein expression in 32 PHEO, 38 MTC, 16 normal adrenal medulla and 15 normal thyroid tissue samples. Immunohistochemistry method was applied to identify the proteins’ subcellular localization. LAT1 and LAT2 were overexpressed in both PHEO and MTC by comparison with normal tissues. LAT1 presented a stronger induction than LAT2, and their greater expression was more evident in PHEO (15.1- and 4.1-fold increases, respectively) than in MTC (9.9- and 4.1-fold increases, respectively). Furthermore we found a good correlation between LAT1/2 and GLUT1 expression levels. A positive correlation was also found between urinary noradrenaline and adrenaline levels and LAT1 gene expression in PHEO. The increased expression of LAT1 is also confirmed at the protein level, in both PHEO and MTC, with a strong cytoplasmic localization. The present study is the first to provide experimental evidence of the overexpression in some NET cancers (such as PHEO or MTC) of L-type amino acid transporters, and the LAT1 isoform in particular, giving the molecular basis to explain the increase of the DOPA uptake seen in such tumor cells.
1 October 2010 in European Journal of Endocrinology
Objective: BRAF V600E is a potential marker of poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancers (PTC). In a previous report, we showed that recurrent PTC with no radioiodine (131I) uptake are frequently associated with BRAF mutations, a low expression of thyroid-related genes and a high expression of glucose type-1 transporter gene.Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess BRAF status in a large series of recurrent PTC patients, considering paired primary and recurrent cancers. The BRAF genotype was correlated with the ability to concentrate 131I and/or 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxi-d-glucose (18F-FDG) in the recurrent cancers, serum markers of recurrence, and patient outcome.Design and methods: We studied 50 PTC patients with recurrent cervical disease submitted to a re-intervention, followed up in median for 9 years. BRAF analysis was conducted by direct sequencing and mutant allele-specific PCR amplification. In 18 cases, molecular analysis was also assessed in the primary cancer. Out of 50 patients, 30 underwent 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography–computed tomography.Results: BRAF V600E-positive recurrent patients were found 131I-negative in 94% of cases (P<0.001); 73% of the cancers carrying BRAF V600E were both 131I-negative and 18F-FDG positive. In paired primary and recurrent PTC, BRAF V600E was observed in 79% of the primary cancers and 84% of their recurrences. Three patients with 131I-negative and BRAF V600E-positive recurrent cancers deceased during follow-up.Conclusions: BRAF mutations are more common in thyroid recurrences with no 131I uptake than in 131I-positive cases. They are correlated with the ability to concentrate 18F-FDG, and they can appear, albeit rarely, as a de novo event in the course of PTC recurrences.
Background: Iodine supplementation during pregnancy in areas with mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency is still debated. Methods: A single-center, randomized, single-blind and placebo-controlled (3:2) trial was conducted. We enrolled 90 women before 12 weeks of gestation. From enrollment up until 8 weeks after delivery, 52 women were given an iodine supplement (225 ug/day, potassium iodide tablets) and 38 were given placebo. At recruitment (T0), in the second (T1) and third trimesters (T2), and 8 weeks after delivery (T3), we measured participants’ urinary iodine-to-creatinine ratio (UI/Creat), thyroid function parameters (thyroglobulin (Tg), TSH, FT3, and FT4), and thyroid volume (TV). The newborns’ urinary iodine concentrations were evaluated in 16 cases. Results: Median UI/Creat at recruitment was 53.3 ug/g. UI/Creat was significantly higher in supplemented women at T1 and T2. Tg levels were lower at T1 and T2 in women with UI/Creat ≥ 150 ug/g, and in the Iodine group at T2 (p = 0.02). There was a negative correlation between Tg and UI/Creat throughout the study (p = 0.03, r = −0.1268). A lower TSH level was found in the Iodine group at T3 (p = 0.001). TV increased by +Δ7.43% in the Iodine group, and by +Δ11.17% in the Placebo group. No differences were found between the newborns’ TSH levels on screening the two groups. Conclusion: Tg proved a good parameter for measuring iodine intake in our placebo-controlled series. Iodine supplementation did not prove harmful to pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency, with no appreciable harmful effect on thyroid function.
6 March 2013 in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Calcitonin (CT) is currently the most sensitive serological marker of C-cell disease [medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and C-cell hyperplasia]. Starting with a report on a case that occurred at our institution, this review focuses on trying to explain the reasons behind the poor specificity and sensitivity of the various CT immunoassays. A 15-year-old patient was referred to our institution in May 2014 for moderately elevated CT levels. Thyroid ultrasonography (US) documented a colloidal goiter. Secondary causes of the hypercalcitoninemia (hyperCT) were ruled out. The mismatch between the clinical picture and the laboratory results prompted us to search for other reasons for the patient’s high CT levels, so we applied the heterophilic blocking tube (HBT) procedure to the patient’s sera before the CT assay. Using this pretreatment step, his serum CT concentration dropped to <1 ng/L, as measured at the same laboratory. Measuring plasma CT has an important role in screening for C-cell disease, but moderately elevated serum CT levels need to be placed in their clinical context, bearing in mind all the secondary causes of C-cell hyperplasia and the possibility of laboratory interference, before exposing patients to the risks and costs of further tests.