Biostimulants constitute an emerging group of crop management products used to enhance productivity under abiotic stress conditions. The ability of some biostimulant products, such as seaweed extracts (SE), to enhance crop tolerance to salinity stress has been documented. SE contain a series of bioactive compounds and signaling molecules, as well as mineral and organic nutrients, that greatly benefit plants. A greenhouse experiment was conducted in order to evaluate SE-mediated tolerance mechanisms in tomato plants under salinity stress. The experiment was divided into two developmental phases (vegetative and reproductive) and included four treatments: control (plants with neither treatment), SE (plants treated with seaweed extract), NaCl (plants irrigated with 300 mM NaCl), and SE + NaCl (plants treated with seaweed extract and irrigated with 300 mM NaCl). Tomato plants treated with the SE from Padina gymnospora showed an increase in root and shoot length (18 cm and 13 cm), root and shoot area (33 cm² and 98 cm²), and shoot and root fresh weight (1.0 and 3.8 g) under the control and salinity stress conditions. The decrease in productivity (number of fruits) associated with salinity stress was reduced from 28.7% to only 3.4% in SE-treated plants. The positive effects of SE application also included early flowering and enhanced fruit weight and quality. Our findings suggest that optimized photosynthetic performance and antioxidant defense systems (proline, total phenols, and flavonoids) appear to be major factors modulating SE responses to salinity tolerance in tomato plants with promising agricultural applications.

The worldwide use of plant biostimulants (PBs) represents an environmentally friendly tool to increase crop yield and productivity. PBs include different substances, compounds, and growth-promoting microorganism formulations, such as those derived from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) or seaweed extracts (SEs), which are used to regulate or enhance physiological processes in plants. This study analyzed the physiological, ecological, and biochemical implications of the addition of two PBs, AMF or SE (both alone and in combination), on tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. “Rio Fuego”). The physiological responses evaluated were related to plant growth and photosynthetic performance. The ecological benefits were assessed based on the success of AMF colonization, flowering, resistance capacity, nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), and polyphenol content. Biochemical effects were evaluated via protein, lipid, carbohydrate, nitrogen, and phosphorous content. Each PB was found to benefit tomato plants in a different but complementary manner. AMF resulted in an energetically expensive (high ETR_MAX but low growth) but protective (high NPQ and polyphenol content) response. AMF + nutritive solution (NS) induced early floration but resulted in low protein, carbohydrate, and lipid content. Both AMF and AMF + NS favored foliar instead of root development. In contrast, SE and SE + NS favored protein content and root development and did not promote flowering. However, the combination of both PBs (AMF + SE) resulted in an additive effect, reflected in an increase in both foliar and root growth as well as protein and carbohydrate content. Moreover, a synergistic effect was also found, which was expressed in accelerated flowering and AMF colonization. We present evidence of benefits to plant performance (additive and synergistic) due to the interactive effects between microbial (AMF) and nonmicrobial (SEs) PBs and propose that the complementary modes of action of both PBs may be responsible for the observed positive effects due to the new and emerging properties of their components instead of exclusively being the result of known constituents. These results will be an important contribution to biostimulant research and to the development of a second generation of PBs in which combined and complementary mechanisms may be functionally designed.

Tomato plants release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) following insect or mechanical damage. In this study, the constitutive and wound‐induced emission levels of VOCs in suppressor of prosystemin‐mediated responses2 (spr2) mutant plants, compromised in linolenic acid (LA) and jasmonic acid (JA) synthesis, and in 35S::prosystemin (35S::prosys) plants, having upregulated direct defence responses, were compared. Thespr2mutants produced constitutively lower levels of VOCs, which were nonetheless increased in response to (a)biotic damage, although at lower levels than wild‐type (Wt) and35S::prosysplants. No significant differences in VOC emissions were detected between the latter two genotypes, thereby suggesting that systemin does not regulate indirect defence responses, whereas differences in fatty acid composition inspr2plants led to the predominant emission of saturated C6 volatiles in response to wounding. The expression of 1‐deoxy‐d‐xylulose 5‐phosphate synthase (DXS2), a key gene involved in VOC synthesis in the chloroplast, was only upregulated inManduca sextaL.‐damaged Wt and35S::prosysplants. However, its expression was restored inspr2plants by exogenous LA or JA, suggesting that abated VOC emissions inspr2plants are correlated with loweredDXS2expression. Bioassays with two different insects showed that adult females significantly preferredspr2plants, indicating that lowered levels of VOCs in tomato influence plant selection by insects during oviposition.