Chiara Lonati

Dr. Chiara Lonati

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ŁNŁukasz Nowak
Łukasz Nowak
Wojciech KrajewskiWojciech Krajewski
Wojciech Krajewski
JCJoanna Chorbińska
Joanna Chorbińska
PKPaweł Kiełb
Paweł Kiełb
MSMichał Sut
Michał Sut
TSTomasz Szydełko
Tomasz Szydełko
Background: The incidence of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is reported in up to 50% of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It was suggested that preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) could increase the IVR rate after RNU. However, the available data are often conflicting. Thus, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we sought to synthesize available data for the impact of pre-RNU URS for UTUC on IVR and other oncological outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in June 2021. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted. The primary endpoint was intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), with the secondary endpoints being cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: Among a total of 5489 patients included in the sixteen selected papers, 2387 (43.4%) underwent diagnostic URS before RNU and 3102 (56.6%) did not. Pre-RNU diagnostic URS was significantly associated with worse IVRFS after RNU (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29–1.61, p < 0.001) than RNU alone. However, subgroup analysis including patients without biopsy during URS revealed no significant impact of diagnostic URS on IVRFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.80, p = 0.16). The results of other analyses showed no significant differences in CSS (HR = 0.94, p = 0.63), OS (HR: 0.94, p = 0.56), and MFS (HR: 0.91, p = 0.37) between patients who underwent URS before RNU and those who did not. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that diagnostic URS prior to RNU is significantly associated with worse IVRFS, albeit with no concurrent impact on the other long-term survival outcomes. Our results indicate that URS has a negative impact on IVRFS only when combined with endoscopic biopsy. Future studies are warranted to assess the role of immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy in patients undergoing biopsy during URS for suspected UTUC.

1 February 2022 in European Urology Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChiara Lonati
Chiara Lonati
ANAndrea Necchi
Andrea Necchi
JRJuan Gómez Rivas
Juan Gómez Rivas
LALuca Afferi
Luca Afferi
ELEkaterina Laukhtina
Ekaterina Laukhtina
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini

1 March 2022 in European Urology Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChiara Lonati
Chiara Lonati
PBPhilipp Baumeister
Philipp Baumeister
POPaola Irene Ornaghi
Paola Irene Ornaghi
ETEttore Di Trapani
Ettore Di Trapani
OCOttavio De Cobelli
Ottavio De Cobelli
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini

21 May 2025 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
MAMario De Angelis
Mario De Angelis
PZPaolo Zaurito
Paolo Zaurito
GTGiovanni Tremolada
Giovanni Tremolada
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini
Objective: To report real‐world rates of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression within a European multicentre cohort with detailed information on intravesical instillation courses, as contemporary data on oncological outcomes in NMIBC are limited.Patients and methods: A total of 1918 patients with NMIBC treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) were retrospectively identified from six tertiary‐referral European centres (2015–2022). Patients were stratified according to European Association of Urology 2021 criteria into low‐ (LR), intermediate‐ (IR), high‐ (HR) and very high‐risk (VHR) categories. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models addressing 5‐year rates of high‐grade (HG) recurrence and progression were fitted. Sensitivity analyses focused on patients receiving intravesical instillations and tested for the effect of adequate course (Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin: five or more induction + two or more maintenance instillations; mitomycin C: complete induction + ≥11 maintenance instillations).Results: Of all NMIBC patients identified, 467 (24.3%) were LR vs 582 (30.3%) IR vs 739 (38.5%) HR vs 130 (6.8%) VHR. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up after TURBT was 26 (12–46) months. The 5‐year HG recurrence rates were 7.2% in LR vs 17.3% in IR vs 26.7% in HR vs 30.9% in VHR patients, resulting in a three‐, five‐ and seven‐fold higher risk of IR, HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). The 5‐year progression rates were 3.9% in LR vs 5.2% in IR vs 13.6% in HR vs 31.6% in VHR patients, resulting in a six‐ and nine‐fold higher risk for HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). In all, 1001 (52.2%) patients underwent intravesical instillations. Those receiving adequate instillation course (244/1001 [24.3%]) had lower HG‐recurrence (hazard ratio 0.3, P < 0.001) and progression (hazard ratio 0.2, P = 0.001) risk.Conclusions: Patients with HR/VHR NMIBC face significantly higher HG recurrence and progression risks. While tailored treatment strategies are needed, adherence to adequate instillation course remains crucial for optimising oncological outcomes.

15 November 2023 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMarkus von Deimling
Markus von Deimling
MFMarc Alain Furrer
Marc Alain Furrer
Laura S. MertensLaura S. Mertens
Laura S. Mertens
Andrea MariAndrea Mari
Andrea Mari
NGNoor van Ginkel
Noor van Ginkel
CCCLIPOLY Study Group Collaborators
CLIPOLY Study Group Collaborators
Objective: To determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node‐positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). Patients and Methods: In this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin‐based peri‐operative chemotherapy for cTany N1‐3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity‐score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models. Results: Of 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4–16) months, and median (IQR) follow‐up of alive patients was 30 (13–51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns ( P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes. Conclusion: Performing an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.

1 September 2022 in European Urology Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChiara Lonati
Chiara Lonati
PBPhilipp Baumeister
Philipp Baumeister
LALuca Afferi
Luca Afferi
AMAndrea Mari
Andrea Mari
AMAndrea Minervini
Andrea Minervini
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini