Aurelien Louvrier

Dr. Aurelien Louvrier

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAurelien Louvrier
Aurelien Louvrier
PMP. Marty
P. Marty
ABA. Barrabé
A. Barrabé
EEE. Euvrard
E. Euvrard
BCB. Chatelain
B. Chatelain
CMC. Meyer
C. Meyer

25 May 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMathilde FENELON
Mathilde FENELON
SCSylvain Catros
Sylvain Catros
CMChristophe Meyer
Christophe Meyer
JFJean-Christophe Fricain
Jean-Christophe Fricain
LOLaurent Obert
Laurent Obert
Florelle GindrauxFlorelle Gindraux
Florelle Gindraux
An important component of tissue engineering (TE) is the supporting matrix upon which cells and tissues grow, also known as the scaffold. Scaffolds must easily integrate with host tissue and provide an excellent environment for cell growth and differentiation. Human amniotic membrane (hAM) is considered as a surgical waste without ethical issue, so it is a highly abundant, cost-effective, and readily available biomaterial. It has biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, adequate mechanical properties (permeability, stability, elasticity, flexibility, resorbability), and good cell adhesion. It exerts anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antimutagenic properties and pain-relieving effects. It is also a source of growth factors, cytokines, and hAM cells with stem cell properties. This important source for scaffolding material has been widely studied and used in various areas of tissue repair: corneal repair, chronic wound treatment, genital reconstruction, tendon repair, microvascular reconstruction, nerve repair, and intraoral reconstruction. Depending on the targeted application, hAM has been used as a simple scaffold or seeded with various types of cells that are able to grow and differentiate. Thus, this natural biomaterial offers a wide range of applications in TE applications. Here, we review hAM properties as a biocompatible and degradable scaffold. Its use strategies (i.e., alone or combined with cells, cell seeding) and its degradation rate are also presented.

1 September 2019 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP. Bouletreau
P. Bouletreau
MMM. Makaremi
M. Makaremi
BIB. Ibrahim
B. Ibrahim
ALAurelien Louvrier
Aurelien Louvrier
NSN. Sigaux
N. Sigaux

1 January 2019 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSN Sigaux
N Sigaux
LPL Pourchet
L Pourchet
PBP Breton
P Breton
SBSophie BROSSET
Sophie BROSSET
ALAurelien Louvrier
Aurelien Louvrier
Christophe A. MarquetteChristophe A. Marquette
Christophe A. Marquette

21 July 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnne-Sabine Cousin
Anne-Sabine Cousin
PBPierre Bouletreau
Pierre Bouletreau
JGJoris Giai
Joris Giai
BIBadr Ibrahim
Badr Ibrahim
ALAurelien Louvrier
Aurelien Louvrier
NSNicolas Sigaux
Nicolas Sigaux
Surgical site infections (SSI) occur in 1.4% to 33.4% of cases after orthognathic surgery. This type of complication is a major concern to surgical teams, but there is no consensus for the prevention and treatment of SSI in orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate the severity and the consequences of postoperative infections. The charts of all the patients operated on by the orthognathic surgery team between January 2015 and July 2017 were collected. All types of orthognathic procedures (Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split mandibular osteotomy, and genioplasty) were screened, and patients diagnosed with SSI were included. Demographic data, timing and severity of the infection, as well as long-term complications were recorded. Five hundred and twelve patients were screened. Forty-one patients (8%) presenting with SSI were included. There were 18 men and 23 women. The site of the infection was mandibular for 38 patients (92.7%) and maxillary for 3 patients (7.3%). The average time between surgery and infection was 31.5 days. Twenty-four patients received isolated oral antibiotics for inflammatory cellulitic reaction (58.8%), 15 patients had a localized collection treated by incision and drainage under local anesthesia (36.6%), and 2 patients had an extensive collection requiring surgical drainage under general anesthesia (4.9%). Five patients (12.2%) needed hardware removal for plate loosening, and 2 patients (4.9%) developed chronic osteomyelitis. Infection following orthognathic surgery is easily treated most of the time with no long-term complications. In cases of patients with potential risk factors for severe infection, antibiotics may be given with curative intents.

23 February 2017 in International Endodontic Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAurelien Louvrier
Aurelien Louvrier
EEE. Euvrard
E. Euvrard
LNL. Nicod
L. Nicod
GRG. Rolin
G. Rolin
FGF. Gindraux
F. Gindraux
CMC. Meyer
C. Meyer