Lidia Cabañes-Martínez

Dr. Lidia Cabañes-Martínez

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
MVMarta Villadóniga
Marta Villadóniga
LGLiliana González-Rodríguez
Liliana González-Rodríguez
LALesly Araque
Lesly Araque
ADAlba Díaz-Cid
Alba Díaz-Cid
IRIgnacio Regidor
Ignacio Regidor

10 September 2009 in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FVF Valldeoriola
F Valldeoriola
IRI Regidor
I Regidor
AMAdolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
Adolfo Mínguez-Castellanos
ELE Lezcano
E Lezcano
PGP Garcia-Ruiz
P Garcia-Ruiz
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
Background: Dystonia is a complex clinical syndrome originated by a wide range of aetiologies. The diagnosis of dystonia is made after the evaluation of aetiological, phenomenological and genetic factors.1 Medications, except in patients with dopa-responsive dystonia, are of limited efficacy. Botulinum toxin injections are not applicable to patients with generalised dystonia, since many muscular groups contribute to disability.2 Clinical studies in children and adults with primary generalised dystonia (PGD) have reported beneficial effects of bilateral GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) in both motor symptoms and disability produced by dystonia3 4 5 as well as a favourable impact of DBS in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL).6 Some clinical aspects of GPi stimulation in primary dystonia still remain controversial such as the influence of disease duration or age at onset in determining the postoperative clinical outcome. Results: The authors report the results of a multicentric study designed to assess the tolerability and clinical effects of bilateral pallidal DBS on motor impairment, functional disability, quality of life, pain and mood in patients with medically refractory primary generalised or segmental dystonia.

1 March 2008 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMC.M. Magariños-Ascone
C.M. Magariños-Ascone
IRI. Regidor
I. Regidor
MGMarta Gomez Galan
Marta Gomez Galan
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
RFR. Figueiras-Méndez
R. Figueiras-Méndez

28 August 2017 in International Journal of Neural Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDavid Martín-López
David Martín-López
DJDiego Jiménez-Jiménez
Diego Jiménez-Jiménez
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
RSRichard P. Selway
Richard P. Selway
AVAntonio Valentín
Antonio Valentín
GAGonzalo Alarcón
Gonzalo Alarcón

1 February 2009 in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGuillermo Lahera
Guillermo Lahera
APA. Pedrera
A. Pedrera
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
JFJ. Fernandez-Lorente
J. Fernandez-Lorente
PSPatricia Simal
Patricia Simal
JSJ. Saiz-Ruiz
J. Saiz-Ruiz

1 January 2017 in Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGuillermo Martín-Palomeque
Guillermo Martín-Palomeque
ACAntonio Castro-Ortiz
Antonio Castro-Ortiz
PPPilar Pamplona-Valenzuela
Pilar Pamplona-Valenzuela
MSMiguel Á. Saiz-Sepúlveda
Miguel Á. Saiz-Sepúlveda
Lidia Cabañes-MartínezLidia Cabañes-Martínez
Lidia Cabañes-Martínez
JLJaime R. López
Jaime R. López
Purpose: Although large amplitude evoked potentials (EPs) are typically associated with progressive myoclonic epilepsy patients, giant EPs imply central nervous system (CNS) hyperexcitability and can be seen in various nonepileptic disorders. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review including history, physical examination, imaging and diagnostic studies of nonepileptic patients with large amplitude somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) during 2007 to 2013. Large amplitude EPs were defined as follows: VEPs (N75-P100) >18 μV; and SSEPs (N20-P25) >6.4 μV. Recording montage for VEPs was Oz-Cz and SSEPs C3′/C4′-Fz. Results: Fifty-two patients (33 females, 19 males; age range, 9–90 years) were identified. No CNS pathology was detected in 7 patients. All remaining patients were diagnosed with new CNS disorders including: vascular (37%); myelopathies (13%); demyelinating (11%); space occupying lesions (8.7%); syringomyelia (8.7%); hydrocephalus (6.5%); Vitamin B-12 deficiency (4.3%); multiple system atrophy (4.3%); and toxins (2.2%). Conclusions: This study supports the notion that large amplitude EP implies CNS hyperexcitability and CNS disease. These results confirm the utility of EP studies in patients with suspected CNS pathology.