Marketa Janatova

Marketa Janatova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2005 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PPPetr Pohlreich
Petr Pohlreich
MZMichal Zikan
Michal Zikan
JSJana Stribrna
Jana Stribrna
ZKZdenek Kleibl
Zdenek Kleibl
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova
BMBohuslav Matous
Bohuslav Matous
Background: Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been shown to account for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. The purpose of our study was to estimate the incidence and spectrum of pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in high-risk Czech families. Methods: A total of 96 Czech families with recurrent breast and/or ovarian cancer and 55 patients considered to be at high-risk but with no reported family history of cancer were screened for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. The entire coding sequence of each gene was analyzed using a combination of the protein truncation test and direct DNA sequencing. Results: A total of 35 mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were identified in high-risk families (36.5%). Pathogenic mutations were found in 23.3% of breast cancer families and in 59.4% of families with the occurrence of both breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, four mutations were detected in 31 (12.9%) women with early onset breast cancer. One mutation was detected in seven (14.3%) patients affected with both a primary breast and ovarian cancer and another in three (33.3%) patients with a bilateral breast cancer. A total of 3 mutations in BRCA1 were identified among 14 (21.4%) women with a medullary breast carcinoma. Of 151 analyzed individuals, 35 (23.2%) carried a BRCA1 mutation and 9 (6.0%) a BRCA2 mutation. One novel truncating mutation was found in BRCA1 (c.1747A>T) and two in BRCA2 (c.3939delC and c.5763dupT). The 35 identified BRCA1 mutations comprised 13 different alterations. Three recurrent mutations accounted for 71.4% of unrelated individuals with detected gene alterations. The BRCA1 c.5266dupC (5382insC) was detected in 51.4% of mutation positive women. The mutations c.3700_3704del5 and c.181T>G (300T>G) contributed to 11.4% and 8.6% of pathogenic mutations, respectively. A total of eight different mutations were identified in BRCA2. The novel c.5763dupT mutation, which appeared in two unrelated families, was the only recurrent alteration of the BRCA2 gene identified in this study. Conclusion: Mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 genes in 151 high-risk patients characterized the spectrum of gene alterations and demonstrated the dominant role of the BRCA1 c.5266dupC allele in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

13 April 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKlara Lhotova
Klara Lhotova
LSLenka Stolarova
Lenka Stolarova
PZPetra Zemankova
Petra Zemankova
MVMichal Vocka
Michal Vocka
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova
JSJana Soukupova
Jana Soukupova
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy with a substantial proportion of hereditary cases and a frequent association with breast cancer (BC). Genetic testing facilitates treatment and preventive strategies reducing OC mortality in mutation carriers. However, the prevalence of germline mutations varies among populations and many rarely mutated OC predisposition genes remain to be identified. We aimed to analyze 219 genes in 1333 Czech OC patients and 2278 population-matched controls using next-generation sequencing. We revealed germline mutations in 18 OC/BC predisposition genes in 32.0% of patients and in 2.5% of controls. Mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, RAD51C/RAD51D, BARD1, and mismatch repair genes conferred high OC risk (OR > 5). Mutations in BRIP1 and NBN were associated with moderate risk (both OR = 3.5). BRCA1/2 mutations dominated in almost all clinicopathological subgroups including sporadic borderline tumors of ovary (BTO). Analysis of remaining 201 genes revealed somatic mosaics in PPM1D and germline mutations in SHPRH and NAT1 associating with a high/moderate OC risk significantly; however, further studies are warranted to delineate their contribution to OC development in other populations. Our findings demonstrate the high proportion of patients with hereditary OC in Slavic population justifying genetic testing in all patients with OC, including BTO.

13 July 2023 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLenka Stolarova
Lenka Stolarova
PKPetra Kleiblova
Petra Kleiblova
PZPetra Zemankova
Petra Zemankova
BŠBarbora Šťastná
Barbora Šťastná
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova
ZKZdenek Kleibl
Zdenek Kleibl
Purpose: Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2 confer moderately elevated breast cancer risk (odds ratio, OR ∼ 2.5), qualifying carriers for enhanced breast cancer screening. Besides pathogenic variants, dozens of missense CHEK2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, hampering the clinical utility of germline genetic testing (GGT). Experimental Design: We collected 460 CHEK2 missense VUS identified by the ENIGMA consortium in 15 countries. Their functional characterization was performed using CHEK2-complementation assays quantifying KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1–CHEK2-knockout cells. Concordant results in both functional assays were used to categorize CHEK2 VUS from 12 ENIGMA case–control datasets, including 73,048 female patients with breast cancer and 88,658 ethnicity-matched controls. Results: A total of 430/460 VUS were successfully analyzed, of which 340 (79.1%) were concordant in both functional assays and categorized as functionally impaired (N = 102), functionally intermediate (N = 12), or functionally wild-type (WT)–like (N = 226). We then examined their association with breast cancer risk in the case–control analysis. The OR and 95% CI (confidence intervals) for carriers of functionally impaired, intermediate, and WT-like variants were 2.83 (95% CI, 2.35–3.41), 1.57 (95% CI, 1.41–1.75), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08–1.31), respectively. The meta-analysis of population-specific datasets showed similar results. Conclusions: We determined the functional consequences for the majority of CHEK2 missense VUS found in patients with breast cancer (3,660/4,436; 82.5%). Carriers of functionally impaired missense variants accounted for 0.5% of patients with breast cancer and were associated with a moderate risk similar to that of truncating CHEK2 variants. In contrast, 2.2% of all patients with breast cancer carried functionally wild-type/intermediate missense variants with no clinically relevant breast cancer risk in heterozygous carriers.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BŠBarbora Šťastná
Barbora Šťastná
ZVZuzana Volkova
Zuzana Volkova
JSJana Soukupova
Jana Soukupova
PKPetra Kleiblova
Petra Kleiblova
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova
ZKZdenek Kleibl
Zdenek Kleibl
The MRE11, RAD50, and NBN genes encode for the nuclear MRN protein complex, which senses the DNA double strand breaks and initiates the DNA repair. The MRN complex also participates in the activation of ATM kinase, which coordinates DNA repair with the p53-dependent cell cycle checkpoint arrest. Carriers of homozygous germline pathogenic variants in the MRN complex genes or compound heterozygotes develop phenotypically distinct rare autosomal recessive syndromes characterized by chromosomal instability and neurological symptoms. Heterozygous germline alterations in the MRN complex genes have been associated with a poorly-specified predisposition to various cancer types. Somatic alterations in the MRN complex genes may represent valuable predictive and prognostic biomarkers in cancer patients. MRN complex genes have been targeted in several next-generation sequencing panels for cancer and neurological disorders, but interpretation of the identified alterations is challenging due to the complexity of MRN complex function in the DNA damage response. In this review, we outline the structural characteristics of the MRE11, RAD50 and NBN proteins, the assembly and functions of the MRN complex from the perspective of clinical interpretation of germline and somatic alterations in the MRE11, RAD50 and NBN genes.

1 May 2016 in Cancer Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarianna Borecká
Marianna Borecká
PZP. Zemankova
P. Zemankova
MVM. Vocka
M. Vocka
PSP. Soucek
P. Soucek
JSJana Soukupova
Jana Soukupova
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova

23 February 2005 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarketa Janatova
Marketa Janatova
MZMichal Zikan
Michal Zikan
PDPavel Dundr
Pavel Dundr
BMBohuslav Matous
Bohuslav Matous
PPPetr Pohlreich
Petr Pohlreich
Germline mutations in two major susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 contribute to the majority of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Besides the germline mutation, tumor progression depends on the loss of a wild-type allele. Allelic losses in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci have also been detected in a high proportion of sporadic breast tumors, suggesting the role of these genes in the development of non-inherited breast cancer. Forty unselected breast tumors were analyzed for the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at BRCA1 and BRCA2 regions and tumors with allelic deletions were screened for the presence of acquired genetic alterations in respective genes. 21.1% of 38 informative tumor samples carried LOH at the BRCA1 locus whereas 33.3% of 39 informative samples showed LOH at the BRCA2 locus. Pathogenic truncating mutations in the BRCA1 gene were found in two tumor samples with allelic losses, whereas no mutations were identified in the BRCA2 gene. Mutations were not detected in non-tumor samples from the same individuals, which indicated that the BRCA1 allele was inactivated by somatic mutations in tumor tissue. The c.1116G>A (1235G>A) nonsense mutation (p.W372X) belongs to the genetic abnormalities detected infrequently in hereditary tumors; the c.3862delG (3981delG) frameshift mutation (p.E1288fsX1306) is a novel gene alteration. The occurrence of inactivating somatic mutations in sporadic breast tumors suggested the role of the BRCA1 gene in tumorigenesis in at least a minor group of patients with non-familial breast cancer.