Taymaa May

Dr. Taymaa May

University Health Network, Associate professor, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2022 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSabrina Piedimonte
Sabrina Piedimonte
RKRachel Kim
Rachel Kim
MBMarcus Q. Bernardini
Marcus Q. Bernardini
EAEshetu G. Atenafu
Eshetu G. Atenafu
MCMitchell Clark
Mitchell Clark
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May

1 June 2018 in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May
AAAlon D Altman
Alon D Altman
JMJacob D. McGee
Jacob D. McGee
LLLin Lu
Lin Lu
WXWei Xu
Wei Xu
BRBarry Rosen
Barry Rosen

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJie Wei Zhu
Jie Wei Zhu
FWFabian Wong
Fabian Wong
ASAgata Szymiczek
Agata Szymiczek
GEGabrielle E. V. Ene
Gabrielle E. V. Ene
SZShiyu Zhang
Shiyu Zhang
Mohammad Reza AkbariMohammad Reza Akbari
Mohammad Reza Akbari
Ovarian cancer has a high case fatality rate, but patients who have no visible residual disease after surgery have a relatively good prognosis. The presence of any cancer cells left in the peritoneal cavity after treatment may precipitate a cancer recurrence. In many cases, these cells are occult and are not visible to the surgeon. Analysis of circulating tumour DNA in the blood (ctDNA) may offer a sensitive method to predict the presence of occult (non-visible) residual disease after surgery and may help predict disease recurrence. We assessed 48 women diagnosed with serous ovarian cancer (47 high-grade and 1 low-grade) for visible residual disease and for ctDNA. Plasma, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue and white blood cells were used to extract circulating free DNA (cfDNA), tumour DNA and germline DNA, respectively. We sequenced DNA samples for 59 breast and ovarian cancer driver genes. The plasma sample was collected after surgery and before initiating chemotherapy. We compared survival in women with no residual disease, with and without a positive plasma ctDNA test. We found tumour-specific variants (TSVs) in cancer cells from 47 patients, and these variants were sought in ctDNA in their post-surgery plasma. Fifteen (31.9%) of the 47 patients had visible residual disease; of these, all 15 had detectable ctDNA. Thirty-one patients (65.9%) had no visible residual disease; of these, 24 (77.4%) patients had detectable ctDNA. Of the patients with no visible residual disease, those patients with detectable ctDNA had higher mortality (20 of 27 died) than those without detectable ctDNA (3 of 7 died) (HR 2.32; 95% CI: 0.67–8.05), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). ctDNA in post-surgical serum samples may predict the presence of microscopic residual disease and may be a predictor of recurrence among women with ovarian cancer. Larger studies are necessary to validate these findings.

1 January 2022 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RGRebecca M. Goldberg
Rebecca M. Goldberg
SKSoyoun Rachel Kim
Soyoun Rachel Kim
RFRouhi Fazelzad
Rouhi Fazelzad
XLXuan Li
Xuan Li
TBTheodore J. Brown
Theodore J. Brown
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is a relatively chemo-resistant disease with limited effective treatment options for patients with recurrence. Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is commonly offered at recurrence, although any benefit this has on survival is not fully determined. This review evaluates the impact of SCS, including residual disease, on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in recurrent LGSC. A comprehensive search of Medline ALL, Embase Classic + Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science was conducted to obtain studies evaluating optimal or complete SCS versus suboptimal SCS and the amount of residual disease in recurrent LGSC. Meta-analysis was performed and PFS and OS outcomes were calculated. 1Of 5296 studies screened, 350 progressed to full-text review, with 9 ultimately selected for inclusion in the systematic review. Two studies met criteria for meta-analysis of PFS and of OS. The presence of visible residual disease at the conclusion of SCS negatively impacted PFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.72-7.14), whereas SCS with no residual disease significantly improved OS (HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.23-0.7) in patients with recurrent LGSC. Diffuse and extensive disease distribution was inversely linked to survival. In addition, SCS as an initial treatment for recurrent LGSC was associated with superior survival in comparison to chemotherapy. A short platinum-free interval was not associated with worse survival in this cohort. Complete SCS, and to a lesser extent optimal SCS, are associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with recurrent LGSC. SCS may be a better initial treatment strategy than systemic chemotherapy for recurrent disease. Patients with recurrent LGSC should be evaluated for the role of SCS based on disease distribution and functional status, irrespective of the platinum-free interval. Prospective studies are needed to further study the role of SCS in patients with recurrent LGSC.

26 November 2017 in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May
JSJocelyn M. Stewart
Jocelyn M. Stewart
MBMarcus Q. Bernardini
Marcus Q. Bernardini
SFSarah E. Ferguson
Sarah E. Ferguson
SLStephane Laframboise
Stephane Laframboise
BRBarry Rosen
Barry Rosen

1 November 2016 in Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GBGeneviève Bouchard-Fortier
Geneviève Bouchard-Fortier
RKRaymond Kim
Raymond Kim
LALisa Allen
Lisa Allen
AGAbha Gupta
Abha Gupta
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May
To report three cases of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) of the cervix in young women successfully treated with fertility-sparing surgery and chemotherapy. Between January 2014 and December 2015, three cases of ERMS of the cervix were confirmed in young women at a single tertiary cancer center. All cases were managed by a pediatric oncologist and a gynecologic oncologist with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. Fertility-sparing surgeries (cervical conization or robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy) were offered to patients depending on the tumor size. All patients were nulliparous and aged 14, 20 and 21 years and all presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. The first patient was managed with radical trachelectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The second patient underwent primary hysteroscopic resection of the tumor followed by completion cervical conization and adjuvant chemotherapy. The third patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) with positive residual margins. She then underwent completion radical trachelectomy. None of the patients experienced perioperative complications. None of the women received radiation. All patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Fertility-sparing surgery and chemotherapy in well-selected patients with ERMS of the cervix result in low complication rates and excellent oncologic outcomes. This treatment option may be considered in young patients who wish to preserve fertility by avoiding hysterectomy. A collaborative effort between pediatric oncologists and gynecologic oncologists is imperative to facilitate innovative approaches to these rare tumors in young adults.