Myroslava Khomik

Dr. Myroslava Khomik


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNuno Carvalhais
Nuno Carvalhais
MFMatthias Forkel
Matthias Forkel
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
JBJessica Bellarby
Jessica Bellarby
MJMartin Jung
Martin Jung
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
The response of the terrestrial carbon cycle to climate change is among the largest uncertainties affecting future climate change projections1,2. The feedback between the terrestrial carbon cycle and climate is partly determined by changes in the turnover time of carbon in land ecosystems, which in turn is an ecosystem property that emerges from the interplay between climate, soil and vegetation type3,4,5,6. Here we present a global, spatially explicit and observation-based assessment of whole-ecosystem carbon turnover times that combines new estimates of vegetation and soil organic carbon stocks and fluxes. We find that the overall mean global carbon turnover time is years (95 per cent confidence interval). On average, carbon resides in the vegetation and soil near the Equator for a shorter time than at latitudes north of 75° north (mean turnover times of 15 and 255 years, respectively). We identify a clear dependence of the turnover time on temperature, as expected from our present understanding of temperature controls on ecosystem dynamics. Surprisingly, our analysis also reveals a similarly strong association between turnover time and precipitation. Moreover, we find that the ecosystem carbon turnover times simulated by state-of-the-art coupled climate/carbon-cycle models vary widely and that numerical simulations, on average, tend to underestimate the global carbon turnover time by 36 per cent. The models show stronger spatial relationships with temperature than do observation-based estimates, but generally do not reproduce the strong relationships with precipitation and predict faster carbon turnover in many semi-arid regions. Our findings suggest that future climate/carbon-cycle feedbacks may depend more strongly on changes in the hydrological cycle than is expected at present and is considered in Earth system models.

1 February 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKirsten Lees
Kirsten Lees
TQTristan Quaife
Tristan Quaife
RAR.R.E. Artz
R.R.E. Artz
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
JCJoanna Clark
Joanna Clark
Peatlands store large amounts of terrestrial carbon and any changes to their carbon balance could cause large changes in the greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of the Earth's atmosphere. There is still much uncertainty about how the GHG dynamics of peatlands are affected by climate and land use change. Current field-based methods of estimating annual carbon exchange between peatlands and the atmosphere include flux chambers and eddy covariance towers. However, remote sensing has several advantages over these traditional approaches in terms of cost, spatial coverage and accessibility to remote locations. In this paper, we outline the basic principles of using remote sensing to estimate ecosystem carbon fluxes and explain the range of satellite data available for such estimations, considering the indices and models developed to make use of the data. Past studies, which have used remote sensing data in comparison with ground-based calculations of carbon fluxes over Northern peatland landscapes, are discussed, as well as the challenges of working with remote sensing on peatlands. Finally, we suggest areas in need of future work on this topic. We conclude that the application of remote sensing to models of carbon fluxes is a viable research method over Northern peatlands but further work is needed to develop more comprehensive carbon cycle models and to improve the long-term reliability of models, particularly on peatland sites undergoing restoration.

15 July 2010 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matthias PeichlMatthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl
JBJason J. Brodeur
Jason J. Brodeur
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain

1 November 2006 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain
JMJ.H. McCaughey
J.H. McCaughey

26 May 2015 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRachel Skubel
Rachel Skubel
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain
Matthias PeichlMatthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl
JBJason J. Brodeur
Jason J. Brodeur
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
MKMichelle Kula
Michelle Kula

18 October 2013 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWChristopher Williams
Christopher Williams
Melanie VanderhoofMelanie Vanderhoof
Melanie Vanderhoof
MKMyroslava Khomik
Myroslava Khomik
BGBardan Ghimire
Bardan Ghimire