William Turchan

Dr. William Turchan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WTWilliam Turchan
William Turchan
GKGreg Kauffmann
Greg Kauffmann
PPPritesh Patel
Pritesh Patel
AOAytek Oto
Aytek Oto
SLStanley Liauw
Stanley Liauw

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WTWilliam Turchan
William Turchan
SPSean P. Pitroda
Sean P. Pitroda
RWRalph Weichselbaum
Ralph Weichselbaum
Radiotherapy and immunotherapy are most effective as cancer therapies in the setting of low-volume disease. Although initial studies of radio-immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer have not confirmed the efficacy of this approach, the role of radio-immunotherapy in patients with limited metastatic burden is unclear. We propose that further investigation of radio-immunotherapy in metastatic patients should focus upon patients with oligometastatic disease.

12 December 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMark Korpics
Mark Korpics
WTWilliam Turchan
William Turchan
MRMichael Rooney
Michael Rooney
MKMatthew Koshy
Matthew Koshy
MSMichael Spiotto
Michael Spiotto
Early stage glottic cancer has traditionally been treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been recently adopted as an alternative to decrease toxicity. Here, we compared the usage and outcomes of IMRT and 3DCRT for patients with early stage squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottic larynx. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with Stage I–II SCC of the glottis who received 55–75 Gy using IMRT (n = 1623) or 3DCRT (n = 2696). Median follow up was 42 months with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 72%. Using a nominal logistic regression, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis and fraction size were associated with the receipt of IMRT (p < 0.05). Using Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models as well as a propensity matched cohort, there was no difference in OS for patients who received IMRT versus 3DCRT (hazard ratio (HR), 1.08; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.93–1.26; p = 0.302). However, there was a survival benefit for patients receiving slight hypofractionation as compared to conventional fractionation (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69–0.92; p = 0.003). IMRT was associated with similar survival as 3DCRT, supporting the implementation of this potentially less toxic modality without compromising survival.

7 May 2021 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WTWilliam Turchan
William Turchan
MKMark C. Korpics
Mark C. Korpics
MRMichael Rooney
Michael Rooney
MKMatthew Koshy
Matthew Koshy
MSMichael Spiotto
Michael Spiotto

1 June 2022 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WTWilliam Turchan
William Turchan
DCDan Cutright
Dan Cutright
TWTianming Wu
Tianming Wu
JLJim X. Leng
Jim X. Leng
JDJames J. Dignam
James J. Dignam
SLStanley L. Liauw
Stanley L. Liauw
Purpose:Hematuria following post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT) is inadequately characterized. We performed a consecutive cohort study of patients treated with PPRT at our institution to charact...