Irene Lidoriki

Dr. Irene Lidoriki

Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2021 in Postgraduate Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMichail Papapanou
Michail Papapanou
EREleni Routsi
Eleni Routsi
KTKonstantinos Tsamakis
Konstantinos Tsamakis
LFLampros Fotis
Lampros Fotis
GMGeorgios Marinos
Georgios Marinos
DSDimitrios Schizas
Dimitrios Schizas
COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly disrupted the well-established, traditional structure of medical education. Τhe new limitations of physical presence have accelerated the development of an online learning environment, comprising both of asynchronous and synchronous distance education, and the introduction of novel ways of student assessment. At the same time, this prolonged crisis had serious implications on the lives of medical students including their psychological well-being and the impact on their academic trajectories. The new reality has, on many occasions, triggered the ‘acting up’ of medical students as frontline healthcare staff, which has been perceived by many of them as a positive learning and contributing experience, and has led to a variety of responses from the educational institutions. All things considered, the urgency for rapid and novel adaptations to the new circumstances has functioned as a springboard for remarkable innovations in medical education,including the promotion of a more “evidence-based” approach.

23 April 2020 in Nutrition and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Irene LidorikiIrene Lidoriki
Irene Lidoriki
DSDimitrios Schizas
Dimitrios Schizas
MFMaximos Frountzas
Maximos Frountzas
Nikolaos MachairasNikolaos Machairas
Nikolaos Machairas
APAnastasia Prodromidou
Anastasia Prodromidou
TLTheodoros Liakakos
Theodoros Liakakos
Oncologic patients often suffer from malnutrition which in turn, might have negative impact on treatment outcomes. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), as an index of impaired nutritional status, has emerged as a significant prognostic factor for short-and long-term outcomes in cancer patients. The aim of the current systematic review is to determine whether the GNRI is an independent prognostic factor of postoperative complications and survival in cancer patients. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies, published from 2005 to 2019, which assessed associations between GNRI and short- and long-term outcomes in cancer patients. Eighteen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Low scores of GNRI were associated with increased risk for developing postoperative complications and impaired survival of cancer patients in most studies. Our findings support the use of the GNRI in the clinical practice, since it is a simple and reliable tool for assessing nutritional status in oncologic patients. More prospective, multi-centered studies are warranted to confirm the current results, as well as the role of nutritional support in improving the prognosis of cancer patients.

5 January 2022 in The Surgeon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DIMITRIOS SCHIZASDIMITRIOS SCHIZAS
DIMITRIOS SCHIZAS
MPMichail Papapanou
Michail Papapanou
EREleni Routsi
Eleni Routsi
AMAikaterini Mastoraki
Aikaterini Mastoraki
Irene LidorikiIrene Lidoriki
Irene Lidoriki
ATAlexandra Tsaroucha
Alexandra Tsaroucha

22 April 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCostas A. Christophi
Costas A. Christophi
MSMercedes Sotos-Prieto
Mercedes Sotos-Prieto
FLFan-Yun Lan
Fan-Yun Lan
MDMario Delgado-Velandia
Mario Delgado-Velandia
VEVasilis Efthymiou
Vasilis Efthymiou
SKStefanos N. Kales
Stefanos N. Kales
Epidemiological studies have yielded conflicting results regarding climate and incident SARS-CoV-2 infection, and seasonality of infection rates is debated. Moreover, few studies have focused on COVD-19 deaths. We studied the association of average ambient temperature with subsequent COVID-19 mortality in the OECD countries and the individual United States (US), while accounting for other important meteorological and non-meteorological co-variates. The exposure of interest was average temperature and other weather conditions, measured at 25 days prior and 25 days after the first reported COVID-19 death was collected in the OECD countries and US states. The outcome of interest was cumulative COVID-19 mortality, assessed for each region at 25, 30, 35, and 40 days after the first reported death. Analyses were performed with negative binomial regression and adjusted for other weather conditions, particulate matter, sociodemographic factors, smoking, obesity, ICU beds, and social distancing. A 1 °C increase in ambient temperature was associated with 6% lower COVID-19 mortality at 30 days following the first reported death (multivariate-adjusted mortality rate ratio: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.99, p = 0.016). The results were robust for COVID-19 mortality at 25, 35 and 40 days after the first death, as well as other sensitivity analyses. The results provide consistent evidence across various models of an inverse association between higher average temperatures and subsequent COVID-19 mortality rates after accounting for other meteorological variables and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection or death. This suggests potentially decreased viral transmission in warmer regions and during the summer season.

4 February 2020 in Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Irene LidorikiIrene Lidoriki
Irene Lidoriki
DSDimitrios Schizas
Dimitrios Schizas
KMKonstantinos S. Mylonas
Konstantinos S. Mylonas
Maximos FrountzasMaximos Frountzas
Maximos Frountzas
AMAikaterini Mastoraki
Aikaterini Mastoraki
IKIoannis Karavokyros
Ioannis Karavokyros
Objective: Malnutrition is common in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Our goal was to explore postoperative compliance with oral nutritional supplementation and define barriers to consumption in patients with esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancer. Methods: Participants were prospectively recruited from September 2015 to November 2018. Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Malnourished patients and patients at risk for malnutrition were offered oral nutritional supplementation at the time of hospital discharge. Compliance was evaluated 1 month after hospital discharge. Results: A total of 78 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 62.8 ± 10.7 years and 83.3% were males. Εsophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in 60.3% and 39.7% of the patients respectively. Twenty-eight (35.9%) participants reported consuming all prescribed supplements, whereas 50 (64.1%) patients were noncompliant with their prescribed oral nutritional supplementation regimen. The main barriers to oral nutritional supplementation compliance were bloating (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 17.9% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), early satiety (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 25% vs. 52.32%, p < 0.001), flavor or texture dislike (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 7.1% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), and diarrhea (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 10.7% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). No other statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups. Conclusions: Postoperative compliance to oral nutritional supplementation is low in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Patient education and support as well as providing a range of oral nutrition supplement flavors, texture, and compositions may be useful in increasing adherence to oral nutritional supplementation regimens.

4 September 2017 in Frontiers in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMEvangelos P. Misiakos
Evangelos P. Misiakos
DTDimitrios Tsapralis
Dimitrios Tsapralis
TKTheodore Karatzas
Theodore Karatzas
Irene LidorikiIrene Lidoriki
Irene Lidoriki
DSDimitrios Schizas
Dimitrios Schizas
AMAnastasios Machairas
Anastasios Machairas
Background. Ischemic colitis (IC) is a common type of ischemic insult, resulting from decreased arterial blood flow to the colon. This disease can be caused from either atherosclerotic occlusive vascular disease or nonocclusive disease. The aim of this study is to present the diagnostic methodology and management of this severe disease based on current literature. Methods. A literature search has been done including articles referring to modern diagnosis and management of IC. Results IC is usually a transient disease, but it can also cause gangrene of the colon, requiring emergency surgical exploration. Diagnosis is troublesome and is based on imaging examinations, mainly computerized tomography, which in association with colonoscopy can delineate the distribution pattern and severity of disease. Conclusion The majority of patients with mild disease have usually complete clinical recovery within a short period. The severe forms of the disease carry high morbidity and mortality rates and prompt surgical intervention is the only way to improve the associated severe prognosis.