Monica Neagu

Dr. Monica Neagu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2001 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adrian NeaguAdrian Neagu
Adrian Neagu
MNMonica Neagu
Monica Neagu
András DérAndrás Dér
András Dér

30 August 2006 in Modern Physics Letters B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adrian NeaguAdrian Neagu
Adrian Neagu
IKIoan Kosztin
Ioan Kosztin
KJKaroly Jakab
Karoly Jakab
BBBogdan Barz
Bogdan Barz
MNMonica Neagu
Monica Neagu
GFGabor Forgacs
Gabor Forgacs

9 May 2021 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FBFlorina Bojin
Florina Bojin
ARAndreea Robu
Andreea Robu
MBMaria Iulia Bejenariu
Maria Iulia Bejenariu
VOValentin Laurențiu Ordodi
Valentin Laurențiu Ordodi
Gheorghe-Emilian OlteanuGheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
Gheorghe-Emilian Olteanu
VPVirgil Păunescu
Virgil Păunescu
The tumor microenvironment (TME) influences cancer progression. Therefore, engineered TME models are being developed for fundamental research and anti-cancer drug screening. This paper reports the biofabrication of 3D-printed avascular structures that recapitulate several features of the TME. The tumor is represented by a hydrogel droplet uniformly loaded with breast cancer cells (106 cells/mL); it is embedded in the same type of hydrogel containing primary cells—tumor-associated fibroblasts isolated from the peritumoral environment and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Hoechst staining of cryosectioned tissue constructs demonstrated that cells remodeled the hydrogel and remained viable for weeks. Histological sections revealed heterotypic aggregates of malignant and peritumoral cells; moreover, the constituent cells proliferated in vitro. To investigate the interactions responsible for the experimentally observed cellular rearrangements, we built lattice models of the bioprinted constructs and simulated their evolution using Metropolis Monte Carlo methods. Although unable to replicate the complexity of the TME, the approach presented here enables the self-assembly and co-culture of several cell types of the TME. Further studies will evaluate whether the bioprinted constructs can evolve in vivo in animal models. If they become connected to the host vasculature, they may turn into a fully organized TME.

11 September 2020 in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMonica Miclos-Balica
Monica Miclos-Balica
PMPaul Muntean
Paul Muntean
FSFalk Schick
Falk Schick
HHHoria Haragus
Horia Haragus
BGBogdan Glisici
Bogdan Glisici
MNMonica Neagu
Monica Neagu
Background/Objectives: Several studies have addressed the validity of ultrasound (US) for body composition assessment, but few have evaluated its reliability. This study aimed to determine the reliability of percent body fat (%BF) estimates using A-mode US in a heterogeneous sample. Subjects/Methods: A group of 144 healthy adults (81 men and 63 women), 30.4 (10.1) years (mean (SD)), BMI 24.6 (4.7) kg/m2, completed 6 consecutive measurements of the subcutaneous fat layer thickness at 8 anatomical sites. The measurements were done, alternatively, by two testers, using a BodyMetrix™ instrument. To compute %BF, 4 formulas from the BodyView™ software were applied: 7-sites Jackson and Pollock, 3-sites Jackson and Pollock, 3-sites Pollock, and 1-point biceps. Results: The formula with the most anatomic sites provided the best reliability quantified by the following measures: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.979 for Tester 1 (T1) and 0.985 for T2, technical error of measurement (TEM) = 1.07% BF for T1 and 0.89% BF for T2, and minimal detectable change (MDC) = 2.95% BF for T1, and 2.47% BF for T2. The intertester bias was −0.5% BF, whereas the intertester ICC was 0.972. The intertester MDC was 3.43% BF for the entire sample, 3.24% BF for men, and 3.65% BF for women. Conclusions: A-mode US is highly reliable for %BF assessments, but it is more precise for men than for women. Examiner performance is a source of variability that needs to be mitigated to further improve the precision of this technique.

27 January 2024 in Gels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SAStelian Arjoca
Stelian Arjoca
FBFlorina Bojin
Florina Bojin
MNMonica Neagu
Monica Neagu
APAndreea Paunescu
Andreea Paunescu
Adrian NeaguAdrian Neagu
Adrian Neagu
VPVirgil Păunescu
Virgil Păunescu
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the use of computer-controlled transfer processes for assembling bioinks (cell clusters or materials loaded with cells) into structures of prescribed 3D organization. The correct bioprinting parameters ensure a fast and accurate bioink deposition without exposing the cells to harsh conditions. This study seeks to optimize pneumatic extrusion-based bioprinting based on hydrogel flow rate and extrusion speed measurements. We measured the rate of the hydrogel flow through a cylindrical nozzle and used non-Newtonian hydrodynamics to fit the results. From the videos of free-hanging hydrogel strands delivered from a stationary print head, we inferred the extrusion speed, defined as the speed of advancement of newly formed strands. Then, we relied on volume conservation to evaluate the extrudate swell ratio. The theoretical analysis enabled us to compute the extrusion speed for pressures not tested experimentally as well as the printing speed needed to deposit hydrogel filaments of a given diameter. Finally, the proposed methodology was tested experimentally by analyzing the morphology of triple-layered square-grid hydrogel constructs printed at various applied pressures while the printing speeds matched the corresponding extrusion speeds. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that preliminary measurements and theoretical analyses can simplify the search for the optimal bioprinting parameters.

1 April 2010 in BioSystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adrian NeaguAdrian Neagu
Adrian Neagu
VMVladimir Mironov
Vladimir Mironov
IKIoan Kosztin
Ioan Kosztin
BBBogdan Barz
Bogdan Barz
MNMonica Neagu
Monica Neagu
GFGabor Forgacs
Gabor Forgacs