Squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (SCCO) is still a pathology of bad prognosis. Specific therapies are now developed against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, c-kit receptor (CD117), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and p53 protein. This study was aimed at assessing their expression in a large series of SCCO, as well as their potential therapeutic interest in this pathology. Immunohistochemical expression of these factors was assessed retrospectively in 107 cases of SCCO with primary surgery, as well as their relationships to recurrence, metastasis and overall survival on a long-term follow-up. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and CD117 were expressed in less than 3% of the cases. Epidermal growth factor receptor and p53 were overexpressed in 68.2 and 66.4% of the cases, and VEGF in 38.3%. Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression was significantly related to vascular invasion (P=0.023). Its diffuse positivity was significantly related in multivariate analysis to higher local recurrence (P=0.006) and lower overall survival (P=0.003), in a subgroup of patients of poor outcome who had received postoperative adjuvant treatment. These results highlight the great potential prognostic and therapeutic interest of evaluating EGFR diffuse positivity in locally advanced SCCO.

Purpose: Zolbetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and mediates tumor cell death through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. We sought to examine zolbetuximab combinations in CLDN18.2-positive HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: This phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab, alone or with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) or pembrolizumab, in CLDN18.2-positive advanced/metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients received zolbetuximab as monotherapy in third/later-line (Cohort 1A, n = 30), with mFOLFOX6 in first-line (Cohort 2, n = 21), or with pembrolizumab in third/later-line (Cohort 3A, n = 3) treatment. The primary endpoint for Cohort 1A was objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints were ORR (Cohorts 2 and 3A), overall survival (OS; Cohort 1A), and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety (all cohorts). Results: ORR was 0% in Cohorts 1A and 3A, and 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 47.82–88.72] in Cohort 2. Median PFS was 1.54 months (95% CI, 1.31–2.56) in Cohort 1A, 2.96 months (95% CI, 1.48–4.44) in Cohort 3A, and 17.8 months (95% CI, 8.05–25.69) in Cohort 2. Median OS in Cohort 1A was 5.62 months (95% CI, 2.27–11.53). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred across cohorts [nausea, 63%–90% (grade ≥ 3, 4.8%–6.7%) and vomiting, 33%–67% (grade ≥ 3, 6.7%–9.5%)]. Conclusions: Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 demonstrated promising efficacy in previously untreated patients with CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. These data support the first-line development of zolbetuximab in patients whose tumors are CLDN18.2-positive. Across cohorts, zolbetuximab treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals.

PURPOSE: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC) remains a difficult-to-treat disease. Fluorouarcil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin (FFX) is a standard first-line therapy for mPC for patients with a favorable performance status and good organ function. In a phase I study, devimistat (CPI-613) in combination with modified FFX (mFFX) was deemed safe and exhibited promising efficacy in mPC. METHODS: The AVENGER 500 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504423 ) is a global, randomized phase III trial conducted at 74 sites across six countries to investigate the efficacy and safety of devimistat in combination with mFFX (experimental arm) compared with standard-dose FFX (control arm) in treatment-naïve patients with mPC. Treatment, administered in once-every-2-weeks cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, included intravenous devimistat at 500 mg/m ² total per day on days 1 and 3 in the experimental arm. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned (266 in the experimental arm and 262 in the control arm). The median OS was 11.10 months for devimistat plus mFFX versus 11.73 months for FFX (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.18]; P = .655) and median progression-free survival was 7.8 months versus 8.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]; P = .94). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events with >10% frequency in the devimistat plus mFFX arm versus the FFX arm were neutropenia (29.0% v 34.5%), diarrhea (11.2% v 19.6%), hypokalemia (13.1% v 14.9%), anemia (13.9% v 13.6%), thrombocytopenia (11.6% v 13.6%), and fatigue (10.8% v 11.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Devimistat in combination with mFFX did not improve long- and short-term mPC patient outcomes compared with standard FFX. There were no new toxicity signals with the addition of devimistat.

The global KEYNOTE-590 trial was the first to show a significant improvement in survival with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) and supported the approval of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in this setting. After a median follow-up of 22.6 months, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy had a manageable safety profile and significantly improved survival of participants with previously untreated advanced EC. Results of a median follow-up of 58.8 months (range 49.2-70.6 months) are reported. Adults with previously untreated advanced EC or Siewert type 1 gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab. Study outcomes were efficacy and safety. Overall, 749 participants received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 373) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n = 376). Median overall survival was 12.3 months versus 9.8 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.84] with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy; 5-year survival rates were 10.6% and 3.0%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months versus 5.8 months (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.75); 5-year PFS rates were 5.5% and not reached. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 71.9% and 67.6% of participants in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy groups, respectively. Data from KEYNOTE-590 continue to show durable efficacy after 5 years, and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy more than tripled the 5-year overall survival rate compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, with no new safety signals. These results support first-line therapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as standard for previously untreated patients with advanced EC with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1.

In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer has seen tremendous modifications. Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy before or after chemoradiotherapy significantly increases loco-regional disease-free survival, negative surgical margin rates, and complete response rates. The higher complete rate is particularly clinically meaningful given the possibility of organ preservation in this specific sub-population, without compromising overall survival. However, all locally advanced rectal cancer most likely does not benefit from total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), but experiences higher toxicity rates. Diagnosis of complete response after neoadjuvant therapy is a real challenge, with a risk of false negatives and possible under-treatment. These new therapeutic approaches thus raise the need for better selection tools, enabling a personalized therapeutic approach for each patient. These tools mostly focus on the prediction of the pathological complete response given the clinical impact. In this article, we review the place of different biomarkers (clinical, biological, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and radiomics) as well as their clinical implementation and discuss the most recent trends for future steps in prediction modeling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.