Vincenzo Buscemi

Dr. Vincenzo Buscemi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea LauterioAndrea Lauterio
Andrea Lauterio
RCRiccardo De Carlis
Riccardo De Carlis
LCLeonardo Centonze
Leonardo Centonze
VBVincenzo Buscemi
Vincenzo Buscemi
NINiccolò Incarbone
Niccolò Incarbone
LCLuciano De Carlis
Luciano De Carlis
Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

1 February 2021 in Digestive and Liver Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBVincenzo Buscemi
Vincenzo Buscemi
RCRiccardo De Carlis
Riccardo De Carlis
Andrea LauterioAndrea Lauterio
Andrea Lauterio
MMMarco Merli
Marco Merli
Massimo PuotiMassimo Puoti
Massimo Puoti
LCLuciano De Carlis
Luciano De Carlis

24 September 2021 in Transplantology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NINiccolò Incarbone
Niccolò Incarbone
RCRiccardo De Carlis
Riccardo De Carlis
LCLeonardo Centonze
Leonardo Centonze
LPLivia Palmieri
Livia Palmieri
GCGiuseppe Cordaro
Giuseppe Cordaro
LCLuciano De Carlis
Luciano De Carlis
Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of >9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p < 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.

25 March 2021 in Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBVincenzo Buscemi
Vincenzo Buscemi
RCRiccardo De Carlis
Riccardo De Carlis
ALAndrea Lauterio
Andrea Lauterio
MCMario Livio Camozzi
Mario Livio Camozzi
LCLuciano De Carlis
Luciano De Carlis

3 November 2026 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAntonella Delvecchio
Antonella Delvecchio
SCSilvio Caringi
Silvio Caringi
RMRebecca Marino
Rebecca Marino
RARemo Alessandris
Remo Alessandris
Simone ConciSimone Conci
Simone Conci
RMRiccardo Memeo
Riccardo Memeo

1 May 2021 in Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBVincenzo Buscemi
Vincenzo Buscemi
GCGiuliana Checchini
Giuliana Checchini
RCRiccardo De Carlis
Riccardo De Carlis
ALAndrea Lauterio
Andrea Lauterio
Antonio LoforteAntonio Loforte
Antonio Loforte
LCLuciano De Carlis
Luciano De Carlis
Organ shortage is one of the major limitations in the field of liver transplantation, which has led to the consideration of extended criteria donors as a way to expand the donor pool. The use of extended criteria donors in cases of high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores or urgent recipients could be complicated by increased postoperative mortality. Donors on left ventricular assist devices could be considered extended criteria donors because of the mechanical circulatory support itself and the potential of chronic liver damage due to right ventricular failure, but experiences in the literature are limited. Here, we report the first case of an urgent liver retransplant procured from a left ventricular assist device donor.