Paul Prikryl

Dr. Paul Prikryl

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2022 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DTDavid R. Themens
David R. Themens
CWChris Watson
Chris Watson
NŽNedjeljka Žagar
Nedjeljka Žagar
SVSergiy Vasylkevych
Sergiy Vasylkevych
SESean Elvidge
Sean Elvidge
PJPT Jayachandran
PT Jayachandran
In this study, we use measurements from over 4,735 globally distributed Global Navigation Satellite System receivers to track the progression of traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) associated with the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai submarine volcanic eruption. We identify two distinct Large Scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (LSTIDs) and several subsequent Medium Scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (MSTIDs) that propagate radially outward from the eruption site. Within 3,000 km of epicenter, LSTIDs of >1,600 km wavelengths are initially observed propagating at speeds of ∼950 and ∼555 ms−1, before substantial slowing to ∼600 and ∼390 ms−1, respectively. MSTIDs with speeds of 200–400 ms−1 are observed for 6 hrs following eruption, the first of which comprises the dominant global ionospheric response and coincides with the atmospheric surface pressure disturbance associated with the eruption. These are the first results demonstrating the global impact of the Tonga eruption on the ionospheric state.

25 October 2016 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPaul Prikryl
Paul Prikryl
RGR. Ghoddousi‐Fard
R. Ghoddousi‐Fard
JWJ. M. Weygand
J. M. Weygand
AVA. Viljanen
A. Viljanen
MCM. Connors
M. Connors
SVSreeja Vadakke Veettil
Sreeja Vadakke Veettil
The geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March 2015 was caused by the impacts of a coronal mass ejection and a high‐speed plasma stream from a coronal hole. The high‐latitude ionosphere dynamics is studied using arrays of ground‐based instruments including GPS receivers, HF radars, ionosondes, riometers, and magnetometers. The phase scintillation index is computed for signals sampled at a rate of up to 100 Hz by specialized GPS scintillation receivers supplemented by the phase scintillation proxy index obtained from geodetic‐quality GPS data sampled at 1 Hz. In the context of solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system, it is shown that GPS phase scintillation is primarily enhanced in the cusp, the tongue of ionization that is broken into patches drawn into the polar cap from the dayside storm‐enhanced plasma density, and in the auroral oval. In this paper we examine the relation between the scintillation and auroral electrojet currents observed by arrays of ground‐based magnetometers as well as energetic particle precipitation observed by the DMSP satellites. Equivalent ionospheric currents are obtained from ground magnetometer data using the spherical elementary currents systems technique that has been applied over the ground magnetometer networks in North America and North Europe. The GPS phase scintillation is mapped to the poleward side of strong westward electrojet and to the edge of the eastward electrojet region. Also, the scintillation was generally collocated with fluxes of energetic electron precipitation observed by DMSP satellites with the exception of a period of pulsating aurora when only very weak currents were observed.

23 September 2022 in Surveys in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALucilla Alfonsi
Lucilla Alfonsi
NBNicolas Bergeot
Nicolas Bergeot
PCPierre Cilliers
Pierre Cilliers
GFGiorgiana De Franceschi
Giorgiana De Franceschi
LBLisa Baddeley
Lisa Baddeley
SZShasha Zou
Shasha Zou
The Antarctic and Arctic regions are Earth's open windows to outer space. They provide unique opportunities for investigating the troposphere–thermosphere–ionosphere–plasmasphere system at high latitudes, which is not as well understood as the mid- and low-latitude regions mainly due to the paucity of experimental observations. In addition, different neutral and ionised atmospheric layers at high latitudes are much more variable compared to lower latitudes, and their variability is due to mechanisms not yet fully understood. Fortunately, in this new millennium the observing infrastructure in Antarctica and the Arctic has been growing, thus providing scientists with new opportunities to advance our knowledge on the polar atmosphere and geospace. This review shows that it is of paramount importance to perform integrated, multi-disciplinary research, making use of long-term multi-instrument observations combined with ad hoc measurement campaigns to improve our capability of investigating atmospheric dynamics in the polar regions from the troposphere up to the plasmasphere, as well as the coupling between atmospheric layers. Starting from the state of the art of understanding the polar atmosphere, our survey outlines the roadmap for enhancing scientific investigation of its physical mechanisms and dynamics through the full exploitation of the available infrastructures for radio-based environmental monitoring.

2 November 2022 in Annales Geophysicae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPaul Prikryl
Paul Prikryl
RGRobert G. Gillies
Robert G. Gillies
DTDavid R. Themens
David R. Themens
JWJames M. Weygand
James M. Weygand
ETEvan G. Thomas
Evan G. Thomas
SCShibaji Chakraborty
Shibaji Chakraborty
During minor to moderate geomagnetic storms, caused by corotating interaction regions (CIRs) at the leading edge of high-speed streams (HSSs), solar wind Alfvén waves modulated the magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause. The Resolute Bay Incoherent Scatter Radars (RISR-C and RISR-N), measuring plasma parameters in the cusp and polar cap, observed ionospheric signatures of flux transfer events (FTEs) that resulted in the formation of polar cap patches. The patches were observed as they moved over the RISR, and the Canadian High-Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) ionosondes and GPS receivers. The coupling process modulated the ionospheric convection and the intensity of ionospheric currents, including the auroral electrojets. The horizontal equivalent ionospheric currents (EICs) are estimated from ground-based magnetometer data using an inversion technique. Pulses of ionospheric currents that are a source of Joule heating in the lower thermosphere launched atmospheric gravity waves, causing traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) that propagated equatorward. The TIDs were observed in the SuperDual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) high-frequency (HF) radar ground scatter and the detrended total electron content (TEC) measured by globally distributed Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers.

1 June 2018 in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPaul Prikryl
Paul Prikryl
RBRobert Bruntz
Robert Bruntz
TTTakumi Tsukijihara
Takumi Tsukijihara
KIKoki Iwao
Koki Iwao
DMDonald B. Muldrew
Donald B. Muldrew
PŠPavel Šťastný
Pavel Šťastný

2 June 2015 in Annales Geophysicae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPaul Prikryl
Paul Prikryl
RGR. Ghoddousi-Fard
R. Ghoddousi-Fard
ETE. G. Thomas
E. G. Thomas
JRJ. M. Ruohoniemi
J. M. Ruohoniemi
SSS. G. Shepherd
S. G. Shepherd
YMY. T. Morton
Y. T. Morton
The interval of geomagnetic storms of 7–17 March 2012 was selected at the Climate and Weather of the Sun-Earth System (CAWSES) II Workshop for group study of space weather effects during the ascending phase of solar cycle 24 (Tsurutani et al., 2014). The high-latitude ionospheric response to a series of storms is studied using arrays of GPS receivers, HF radars, ionosondes, riometers, magnetometers, and auroral imagers focusing on GPS phase scintillation. Four geomagnetic storms showed varied responses to solar wind conditions characterized by the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and solar wind dynamic pressure. As a function of magnetic latitude and magnetic local time, regions of enhanced scintillation are identified in the context of coupling processes between the solar wind and the magnetosphere–ionosphere system. Large southward IMF and high solar wind dynamic pressure resulted in the strongest scintillation in the nightside auroral oval. Scintillation occurrence was correlated with ground magnetic field perturbations and riometer absorption enhancements, and collocated with mapped auroral emission. During periods of southward IMF, scintillation was also collocated with ionospheric convection in the expanded dawn and dusk cells, with the antisunward convection in the polar cap and with a tongue of ionization fractured into patches. In contrast, large northward IMF combined with a strong solar wind dynamic pressure pulse was followed by scintillation caused by transpolar arcs in the polar cap.