Sulfur isotope in sulfides from the Paleoarchean and the Neoarchean sedimentary rocks evidence microbial sulfur metabolism in Archean sulfur cycle. However, sulfur metabolism for the Mesoarchean interval is less obvious since evidence for a large range in sulfur isotope values has not yet been observed in Mesoarchean samples. We report the results of multiple sulfur isotope measurements for sulfide minerals from ~2.8 Ga sedimentary rocks in the southeastern part of the Karelian Craton. In situ isotope analysis of sulfide grains have been performed using a femtosecond laser-ablation fluorination method. Sulfide samples studied here yielded Δ³³S values between −0.3 and +2.7‰ and δ³⁴S values between −10 and +33‰. The Δ³³S dataset was interpreted to indicate the incorporation of sulfur from two coexisting sulfur pools, photolytic sulfate and photolytically derived elemental sulfur. We suggest that the relative contributions of these Δ³³S different pools to the pyritic sulfur could be controlled by the metabolic activity of coexisting sulfate-reducing and sulfur-disproportionating bacteria during pyrite formation. We therefore suggest the operation of different metabolic pathways of sulfur in Mesoarchean sedimentary environments.

A new gem corundum occurrence has been discovered in the Naryn-Gol Creek placer of the Dzhida volcanic field (Russia). In this placer deposit, sapphire associates with large crystals of garnet, spinel, augite, olivine, enstatite, ilmenite, Ti-magnetite, and alkali feldspar. Such a combination of minerals is typical for the placer deposits associated with alkali basalts widely distributed in Southeastern Asia and Australia. We have also found sapphire crystals in phonotephrites of the nearby Cenozoic alkali-basalt paleovolcano Barun Khobol Pravyi, and in basalt sample and trachybasalt from the valley flood basalts. The chemical composition of sapphire is generally typical for ‘basalt’ corundum: it is rich in Fe, and depleted in Ti and Cr. The δ¹⁸O _SMOW values of corundum and related megacrysts range from 4.6 to 6.8 ‰, thus corresponding to the isotopic signature of igneous rocks. Etched and corroded surfaces of sapphire and other megacrysts indicate that they are in non-equilibrium with their host alkali basalts. Volatile components, CO₂ in particular, played a significant role during sapphire formation as gas inclusions reveal.

Relevance. The need of new knowledge about the early stages of the Earth. Sulfur isotope analysis of sulfide minerals is a powerful tool to understand the processes during the Archaean and Paleoproterozoic. Combined with other data, isotope geochemistry provides an insight into sulfur sources of sulfides from ancient sulfide volcanosedimentary deposits; geochemical factors affecting Archaean sulfide volcanosedimentary ore formation; adjust genetic models and determine the degree of influence of bacteria on the mineral formation. Aim. To identify the sources of sulfur during the formation of sulfide deposits via isotope analysis, and to evaluate bacteria affect mineral formation. Objects. They were obtained from the core of boreholes of Mesoarchaean volcanosedimentary sulfide Central-Vozhma deposit, being a part of the Sumozersko-Kenozersky greenstone belt of the Karelian craton. Methods. Mineralogical studies of rock and ore samples were carried out using optical microscopy; scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The ratios of four stable sulfur isotopes were analyzed in sulfide minerals of the deposit (33S/32S, 34S/32S, 36S/32S). Results. The results obtained demonstrated the polygenic source of sulfur in sulfides. The sulfides have both positive and negative Δ33S values, indicating the presence of atmospheric sulfur formed under UV photolysis during mineral formation. Sulfide minerals include the following components: Seawater sulfate sulfur of photolytic genesis showed a negative anomaly Δ33S (∼ –0.4‰). It was the source of authigenic pyrite. Sulfides crystallized as a result of biological sulfate reduction demonstrated a narrow range of δ34S values (–2.64‰˂0˂+4.27‰). Elemental sulfur of photolytic genesis mobilized from the host sedimentary rocks by hydrothermal fluids. This sulfur, with a positive Δ33S anomaly (up to +1.6‰) took part in the massive sulfide ores formation.