This study investigated the effects of home-based nutritional and telemedicine-based resistance exercise interventions on improving body composition, blood biochemistry, and lower-limb functional performance. In total, 66 obese patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into a diet control group (D), elastic band resistance exercise group (E), and diet control plus elastic band exercise group (D + E). Each group was supervised by a clinical dietitian and follow-up was conducted via telephone calls or a communication application to track the participants’ progress. After 12 weeks of intervention, the D (p < 0.001) and D + E (p < 0.001) groups achieved significant weight loss. The D + E group exhibited a significant reduction in body fat relative to the D (p = 0.019) and E (p = 0.012) groups. Compared with the D (p = 0.002) and E (p = 0.019) groups, the D + E group achieved significant improvements in the timed up-and-go test and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis total scale. The D + E group experienced significant improvements in total cholesterol (p = 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and triglyceride levels (p = 0.007) relative to other groups. In conclusion, individual diet control intervention combined with telemedicine-based resistance exercise intervention significantly improved the body composition, blood biochemistry, and lower-limb functional performance of the investigated population with comorbid conditions.

Background: Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is associated with dental caries. Pilocarpine, a salivary stimulant, can improve the amount and flow rate of saliva in patients with pSS. This study aimed to assess whether the risk of dental caries decreases with the use of pilocarpine in patients with pSS. Methods: For this prospective cohort study, we identified pSS patients from the catastrophic illnesses registry of the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan between 2009 and 2013. We divided participants into pilocarpine and non-user groups based on the pilocarpine prescriptions available during the first 3-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was dental caries. The secondary endpoints were periodontitis and oral candidiasis. We compared the risk of these oral manifestations using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 4973 patients with new-onset pSS were eligible for analysis. After propensity score matching, we included 1014 patients in the pilocarpine group and 2028 patients in the non-user group. During the mean follow-up of 2.6 years, the number of events was 487 in the pilocarpine group (48.0%) and 1047 in the non-user group (51.6%); however, the difference was not significant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.06). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between groups regarding risk of periodontitis (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.03) and oral candidiasis (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.94). Conclusion: Pilocarpine may have no protective effect on dental caries, periodontitis, or oral candidiasis in patients with pSS.

Background: Bone and muscle mass decline after menopause. The risk of osteoarthritis (OA), sarcopenia, and osteoporosis increases in later life. Our objective aimed to assess the possible factors affecting osteoarthritis in menopausal women. Methods: This is a registry study of osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and osteoarthritis. All subjects accepted bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition studies, and X-rays of both knees were performed. A medical history was taken and biochemical data were recorded. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between the presence of osteoarthritis and BMD, muscle mass, and other parameters. Results: A total of 139 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 73.86 ± 5.83 years in the osteoarthritis group and 74.53 ± 9.90 in the non-osteoarthritis group ( p = 0.663). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.36 ± 3.64 kg/m ² in the osteoarthritis group, compared with 23.78 ± 3.61 in the non-osteoarthritis group ( p = 0.366). The lumbar spine T score was -2.06 ± 1.33 g/cm ² in the osteoarthritis group, and -1.25 ± 1.76 in the non-osteoarthritis group ( p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, and chronic kidney disease between the two groups. When we used osteoarthritis as the outcome, we found that the lumbar spine T score had a significant association with osteoarthritis, with a high T score associated with less osteoarthritis formation ( p = 0.024, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.06 (0-0.69)). Conclusions: Knee osteoarthritis was associated with lumbar spine bone density. This study provides the initial information required to develop clinical algorithms for the early identification of potential high-risk populations, as well as essential information for the development of policies for the detection and prevention of osteoarthritis in menopausal women.