Zhengyang Song

Dr. Zhengyang Song


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2018 in Acta Geotechnica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
HKHeinz Konietzky
Heinz Konietzky
MHMartin Herbst
Martin Herbst

1 November 2019 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
HKHeinz Konietzky
Heinz Konietzky
MHMartin Herbst
Martin Herbst

1 April 2018 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
TFThomas Frühwirt
Thomas Frühwirt
HKHeinz Konietzky
Heinz Konietzky

1 March 2020 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
TFThomas Frühwirt
Thomas Frühwirt
HKHeinz Konietzky
Heinz Konietzky

1 April 2020 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMin Zhang
Min Zhang
LDLinming Dou
Linming Dou
HKHeinz Konietzky
Heinz Konietzky
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
SHShan Huang
Shan Huang

21 July 2021 in International Journal of Coal Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJiachen Wang
Jiachen Wang
SYShengli Yang
Shengli Yang
WWWeijie Wei
Weijie Wei
JZJinwang Zhang
Jinwang Zhang
Zhengyang SongZhengyang Song
Zhengyang Song
This review details the state of the art in research on top coal drawing mechanisms in Longwall top coal caving (LTCC) by examining the relevant literature over the last two decades. It starts with an introduction of the brief history and basic procedures of LTCC. The framework of research on the drawing mechanism, basic concepts, and some theoretical models of LTCC are detailed in sect. research framework of top coal drawing mechanism. The authors note that the Top coal drawbody (TCD), Top coal boundary (TCB) and Top coal recovery ratio (TCRR) are key factors in the drawing mechanism. The Body–boundary–ratio (BBR) research system has been the classic framework for research over the last 20 years. The modified Bergmark–Roos model, which considers the effects of the supporting rear canopy, flowing velocity of top coal, and its shape factor, is optimal for characterizing the TCD. A 3D model to describe the TCB that considers the thicknesses of the coal seam and roof strata is reviewed. In sect. physical testing and numerical simulation, the physical tests and numerical simulations in the literature are classified for ease of bibliographical review, and classic conclusions regarding the drawing mechanism of top coal are presented and discussed with elaborate illustrations and descriptions. The deflection of the TCD is noted, and is caused by the shape of the rear canopy. The inclined coal seam always induces a larger TCD, and a deflection in the TCD has also been observed in it. The effects of the drawing sequence and drawing interval on the TCRR are reviewed, where a long drawing interval is found to lead to significant loss of top coal. Its flowing behavior and velocity distribution are also presented. Sect. practical applications of drawing mechanisms for LTCC mines 4 summarizes over 10 cases where the TCRR of LTCC mines improved due to the guidance of the drawing mechanism. The final section provides a summary of the work here and some open questions. Prospective investigations are highlighted to give researchers guidance on promising issues in future research on LTCC.