Susan Cutter

Dr. Susan Cutter

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

47Years (1980-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2003 in Social Science Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter
BBBryan Boruff
Bryan Boruff
WSW. Lynn Shirley
W. Lynn Shirley

1 October 2008 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter
LBLindsey Barnes
Lindsey Barnes
MBMelissa Berry
Melissa Berry
CBChristopher Burton
Christopher Burton
EEElijah Evans
Elijah Evans
JWJennifer Webb
Jennifer Webb

1 December 1996 in Progress in Human Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter

19 February 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter
CFChristina Finch
Christina Finch
During the past four decades (1960–2000), the United States experienced major transformations in population size, development patterns, economic conditions, and social characteristics. These social, economic, and built-environment changes altered the American hazardscape in profound ways, with more people living in high-hazard areas than ever before. To improve emergency management, it is important to recognize the variability in the vulnerable populations exposed to hazards and to develop place-based emergency plans accordingly. The concept of social vulnerability identifies sensitive populations that may be less likely to respond to, cope with, and recover from a natural disaster. Social vulnerability is complex and dynamic, changing over space and through time. This paper presents empirical evidence on the spatial and temporal patterns in social vulnerability in the United States from 1960 to the present. Using counties as our study unit, we found that those components that consistently increased social vulnerability for all time periods were density (urban), race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The spatial patterning of social vulnerability, although initially concentrated in certain geographic regions, has become more dispersed over time. The national trend shows a steady reduction in social vulnerability, but there is considerable regional variability, with many counties increasing in social vulnerability during the past five decades.

1 December 2000 in Annals of the American Association of Geographers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter
JMJerry T. Mitchell
Jerry T. Mitchell
MSMichael S. Scott
Michael S. Scott

1 November 2014 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusan Cutter
Susan Cutter
KAKevin D. Ash
Kevin D. Ash
CEChristopher T. Emrich
Christopher T. Emrich