The large numbers of patients admitted to intensive care units due to COVID-19 has had a major impact on healthcare professionals. The incidence of mental health disorders among these professionals has increased considerably and their professional quality of life has suffered during the pandemic. This study aims to explore the impact of the provision of COVID-19 patient care on ICU healthcare professionals. A mixed methods study with an exploratory concurrent design was conducted between June and November 2020 in the Balearic Islands, Spain. Data were collected using a self-report online survey (n = 122) based on three validated questionnaires, and individual semi-structured in-depth online interviews (n = 11). Respondents scored 2.5 out of 5 on the moral distress scale, moderate/high on the compassion satisfaction scale, and moderate on the burnout and compassion fatigue subscales. Age was significantly and negatively related to professional quality of life but was positively related to workload and unavailability of protective equipment. Three main groups of themes relating to the impact of the pandemic emerged from the in-depth interviews: (a) clinical, (b) professional, and (c) personal and family impacts in the two waves. ICU healthcare professionals should be viewed as second victims of the COVID-19 pandemic as they have suffered significant psychological, professional, and moral harm.

High-fidelity clinical simulation enables skills to be acquired safely and securely by bridging the gap between theory and clinical practice. This method has traditionally been used to address complex clinical scenarios. Students often report high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence, as this method allows them to put techniques and procedures into practice in a safe environment. Most studies assess simulation solely from the students' perspective, disregarding the opinions of teaching staff. To assess the implementation of high-fidelity simulation as a teaching tool for fundamental nursing procedures from the perspectives of students and teachers. A two-phase mixed-methods study. A simulation centre environment at the University of the Balearic Islands (Spain) during the 2018 academic year. Second-year nursing students and staff teaching practical classes on basic patient assessment and monitoring of vital signs. Satisfaction with clinical experience simulation scale, including an open-ended question for students, was used. A focus group session was also held with teachers. A total of 91 students completed the scale, yielding an overall satisfaction score of 9.3 out of 10. The practical dimension attained the highest scores. Motivation to attend class was the lowest-rated aspect of this dimension, although students' expectations and satisfaction increased during the class. In the open-ended question and the debriefing session, students described the simulation as a playful learning method allowing them to put their theoretical knowledge into practice and helping them to manage their fears before coming into contact with real care settings. In the focus group session, teachers analysed their own experiences and described how they perceived students' satisfaction and practical skills. High-fidelity simulation produces good academic outcomes and is highly satisfying for students and teachers.

The nursing care of a critically ill patient in the intensive care unit requires specific training. Virtual reality can facilitate the nursing assessment of critically ill patients. To evaluate the utility of virtual reality as a tool for teaching nursing assessment of critically ill patients. This is a cross-sectional study. University of the Balearic Islands (Spain) during the 2022 academic year. Third-year nursing students. A specific environment was designed for virtual reality immersion using a BNEXT head-mounted display. Data were collected using three questionnaires: perception of self-efficacy regarding skill-acquisition in the nursing care process; immersivity; utility and tool satisfaction. A total of 111 undergraduated nursing students responded, 86.8 % of whom had no previous intensive care units experience. They rated the virtual reality experience positively for learning the nursing care process, emphasising the need for skin and mucosal hygiene, patient mobilisation and family care, as well as an understanding of the therapeutic technology required. A total of 67.6 % felt as though they were physically present. They reported a high degree of acceptance and satisfaction. Virtual reality has facilitated the exposure of students to an unfamiliar environment such as the intensive care units, proving to be useful, satisfying, and motivating in teaching the nursing care process.

The use of physical restraints is a common practice in the care of hospitalised and institutionalised elderly people. This use is determined by factors related to the patients, their families, the healthcare professionals, the institution, and prevailing social values. Today, however, this practice is often questioned because of its physical, psychological, moral, ethical, and legal repercussions. The present study explores attitudes among healthcare professionals towards the physical restraint of geriatric patients in intermediate care hospitals in Majorca. This study is based on a qualitative design, combining an ethnomethodological approach with critical discourse analysis. The theoretical framework is drawn from Foucault’s work in this field and from Haslam’s theory of mechanisation. Individual interviews will be conducted with physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants at intermediate care hospitals in Majorca. The analysis will focus on these professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of such measures, seeking to identify the factors, especially institutional factors, that determine the use of restraints. It is essential to determine the prevailing culture among healthcare professionals regarding the use of physical restraints on geriatric patients in order to design and propose a more dignified health care model in which such restraints are eliminated.

In this paper, we bring together Foucault's biography and oeuvre to explore key concepts that support the analysis of nurses' acts of resistance. Foucault reflected on the power relations taking place in health services, making his contribution especially useful for the analysis of resistance in this context. Over three decades, he proposed a nonnormative philosophy while concomitantly engaging in transgressive practices guided by values such as human rights and social justice. Hence, Foucault's philosophy and public activism are an apparent contradiction, but we argue that when analysed together they allow for a different understanding of his work. We describe the evolution of the concept of resistance in Foucault's work, supported by the approaches of Brent Picket (1996) and Miguel Morey (2013). Foucault started his work considering the idea of transgressiveness as it connects to being at the margins of society. He then spent considerable time elaborating the concept of power and identifying resistance strategies as forms of power exercise. In doing so, he considered that people engage with social change from multiple positions, including limited desire for change, fomenting reforms, or engaging in everyday revolutionary acts. As he further elaborated on power relations and defined resistance, Foucault asserted that resistance involves both repressive and productive dimensions of power, governance of biological life, state governance, and deliberate practices of illegalisms. Finally, Foucault shifted his attention to the freedom of ethical subjects, proposing the use of counter‐conduct and counter‐discourses to speak truth against oppression. Such framework offers a comprehensive lens for analysing nurses' acts of resistance within the complexities of the healthcare system and in society. In summary, Foucault's conceptual framework on resistance expands the role of nurses, to understand them not only as caregivers, but also as political agents capable of confronting and transforming oppressive institutional practices.

Background: Moral distress appears when a healthcare professional is not able to carry out actions in accordance with their professional ethical standards. The Moral Distress Scale-Revised is the most widely used to assess levels of moral distress, but it is not validated in Spanish. The aim of the study is to validate the Spanish version of the Moral Distress Scale – utilised within a sample of Spanish healthcare professionals treating COVID–19 patients. Methods: The original (english) and the portuguese and french versions of the scale were translated into spanish by native or bilingual researchers and reviewed by an academic expert in ethics and moral philosophy as well as by a clinical expert. Research design: Descriptive cross-sectional study carried out using a self-reporting online survey. The data was collected between June- November 2020. A total of 661 professionals responded to the survey (N = 2873). Participants: healthcare professionals with more than two weeks of experience treating COVID–19 patients at the end of their life and working in the public sector of the Balearic Islands Health Service (Spain). Analyses included descriptive statistics, competitive confirmatory factor analysis, evidence on criterion-related validity and estimates of reliability. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Balearic Islands. Results: An unidimensional model in which a general factor of moral distress explained by 11 items of the Spanish version of the MDS–R scale was an adequate representation of the data: χ²(44) = 113.492 (p 0.001); Comparative Fit Index = 0.965; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.079[0.062,0.097]; and Standarized Root Mean-Square = 0.037. Evidence of reliability was excellent: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.886 and McDonald’s omega = 0.910. Moral distress was related to discipline, with nurses having statistically significant higher levels than physicians. Additionally, moral distress successfully predicted professional quality of life, with higher levels of moral distress being related to poorer quality of life. Conclusions: The Spanish version of Moral Distress Scale–Revised can be used as a reliable and valid measurement tool for the evaluation of moral distress experienced by health professionals. This tool will be highly useful for managers and applicable to a variety of healthcare professionals and settings.