Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza

Dr. Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDong Li
Dong Li
MMMichael March
Michael March
AGAlvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
CKCharlly Kao
Charlly Kao
CSChristoph Seiler
Christoph Seiler
HHHakon Hakonarson
Hakon Hakonarson

1 February 2012 in Cellular Signalling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWEva Wertheimer
Eva Wertheimer
AGAlvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
CRCinthia Rosemblit
Cinthia Rosemblit
CLCynthia Lopez-Haber
Cynthia Lopez-Haber
MSMaria Soledad Sosa
Maria Soledad Sosa
MKMarcelo G Kazanietz
Marcelo G Kazanietz

1 January 2012 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AGAlvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
María ArechederraMaría Arechederra
María Arechederra
PDPaloma Bragado Domingo
Paloma Bragado Domingo
JAJulio A. Aguirre-Ghiso
Julio A. Aguirre-Ghiso
APAlmudena Porras
Almudena Porras
We reveal a novel pro-survival role for mammalian p38α in response to H(2)O(2), which involves an up-regulation of antioxidant defenses. The presence of p38α increases basal and H(2)O(2)-induced expression of the antioxidant enzymes: superoxide-dismutase 1 (SOD-1), SOD-2, and catalase through different mechanisms, which protects from reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and prevents cell death. p38α was found to regulate (i) H(2)O(2)-induced SOD-2 expression through a direct regulation of transcription mediated by activating transcription factor 2 (ATF-2) and (ii) H(2)O(2)-induced catalase expression through regulation of protein stability and mRNA expression and/or stabilization. As a consequence, SOD and catalase activities are higher in WT MEFs. We also found that this p38α-dependent antioxidant response allows WT cells to maintain an efficient activation of the mTOR/p70S6K pathway. Accordingly, the loss of p38α leads to ROS accumulation in response to H(2)O(2), which causes cell death and inactivation of mTOR/p70S6K signaling. This can be rescued by either p38α re-expression or treatment with the antioxidants, N-acetyl cysteine, or exogenously added catalase. Therefore, our results reveal a novel homeostatic role for p38α in response to oxidative stress, where ROS removal is favored by antioxidant enzymes up-regulation, allowing cell survival and mTOR/p70S6K activation.

24 July 2012 in Pathology Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Massimo PancioneMassimo Pancione
Massimo Pancione
Andrea remoAndrea remo
Andrea remo
VCVittorio Colantuoni
Vittorio Colantuoni
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of death, despite decades of research. Initially considered as a disease due to genetic mutations, it is now viewed as a complex malignancy because of the involvement of epigenetic abnormalities. A functional equivalence between genetic and epigenetic mechanisms has been suggested in CRC initiation and progression. A hallmark of CRC is its pathogenetic heterogeneity attained through at least three distinct pathways: a traditional (adenoma-carcinoma sequence), an alternative, and more recently the so-called serrated pathway. While the alternative pathway is more heterogeneous and less characterized, the traditional and serrated pathways appear to be more homogeneous and clearly distinct. One unsolved question in colon cancer biology concerns the cells of origin and from which crypt compartment the different pathways originate. Based on molecular and pathological evidences, we propose that the traditional and serrated pathways originate from different crypt compartments explaining their genetic/epigenetic and clinicopathological differences. In this paper, we will discuss the current knowledge of CRC pathogenesis and, specifically, summarize the role of genetic/epigenetic changes in the origin and progression of the multiple CRC pathways. Elucidation of the link between the molecular and clinico-pathological aspects of CRC would improve our understanding of its etiology and impact both prevention and treatment.

16 January 2014 in Journal of Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Massimo PancioneMassimo Pancione
Massimo Pancione
GGGuido Giordano
Guido Giordano
Andrea remoAndrea remo
Andrea remo
AFAntonio Febbraro
Antonio Febbraro
LSLina Sabatino
Lina Sabatino
VCVittorio Colantuoni
Vittorio Colantuoni
Over the past decade, growing evidence indicates that the tumor microenvironment (TME) contributes with genomic/epigenomic aberrations of malignant cells to enhance cancer cells survival, invasion, and dissemination. Many factors, produced orde novosynthesized by immune, stromal, or malignant cells, acting in a paracrine and autocrine fashion, remodel TME and the adaptive immune response culminating in metastasis. Taking into account the recent accomplishments in the field of immune oncology and using metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as a model, we propose that the evasion of the immune surveillance and metastatic spread can be achieved through a number of mechanisms that include (a) intrinsic plasticity and adaptability of immune and malignant cells to paracrine and autocrine stimuli or genotoxic stresses; (b) alteration of positional schemes of myeloid-lineage cells, produced by factors controlling the balance between tumour-suppressing and tumour-promoting activities; (c) acquisition by cancer cells of aberrant immune-phenotypic traits (NT5E/CD73, CD68, and CD163) that enhance the interactions among TME components through the production of immune-suppressive mediators. These properties may represent the driving force of metastatic progression and thus clinically exploitable for cancer prevention and therapy. In this review we summarize results and suggest new hypotheses that favour the growing impact of tumor-infiltrating immune cells on tumour progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance.

22 October 2008 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFElena Fiorio
Elena Fiorio
AMAnna Mercanti
Anna Mercanti
MTMarianna Terrasi
Marianna Terrasi
RMRocco Micciolo
Rocco Micciolo
Andrea remoAndrea remo
Andrea remo
ESEva Surmacz
Eva Surmacz
Background: Obesity in postmenopausal women is associated with increased breast cancer risk, development of more aggressive tumors and resistance to certain anti-breast cancer treatments. Some of these effects might be mediated by obesity hormone leptin, acting independently or modulating other signaling pathways. Here we focused on the link between leptin and HER2. We tested if HER2 and the leptin receptor (ObR) can be coexpressed in breast cancer cell models, whether these two receptors can physically interact, and whether leptin can transactivate HER2. Next, we studied if leptin/ObR can coexist with HER2 in breast cancer tissues, and if presence of these two systems correlates with specific clinicopathological features. Methods: Expression of ObR, HER2, phospo-HER2 was assessed by immonoblotting. Physical interactions between ObR and HER2 were probed by immunoprecipitation and fluorescent immunostaining. Expression of leptin and ObR in breast cancer tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Associations among markers studied by IHC were evaluated using Fisher's exact test for count data. Results: HER2 and ObR were coexpressed in all studied breast cancer cell lines. In MCF-7 cells, HER2 physically interacted with ObR and leptin treatment increased HER2 phosphorylation on Tyr 1248. In 59 breast cancers, the presence of leptin was correlated with ObR (the overall association was about 93%). This result was confirmed both in HER2-positive and in HER2-negative subgroups. The expression of leptin or ObR was numerically more frequent in larger (> 10 mm) tumors. Conclusion: Coexpression of HER2 and the leptin/ObR system might contribute to enhanced HER2 activity and reduced sensitivity to anti-HER2 treatments.