Carlos Arias

Dr. Carlos Arias


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Energy Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XRXosé-Antón Rodríguez
Xosé-Antón Rodríguez
CACarlos Arias
Carlos Arias

1 February 2006 in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAntonio Alvarez
Antonio Alvarez
CACarlos Arias
Carlos Arias
LOLuis Orea
Luis Orea

1 December 2015 in Resources Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XRXosé A. Rodríguez
Xosé A. Rodríguez
CACarlos Arias
Carlos Arias
XRXosé-Antón Rodríguez
Xosé-Antón Rodríguez

1 May 2004 in Agricultural Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAntonio Alvarez
Antonio Alvarez
CACarlos Arias
Carlos Arias

28 October 2021 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACarlos Arias
Carlos Arias
JVJavier Valbuena
Javier Valbuena
JGJose Manuel Garcia
Jose Manuel Garcia
(1) Background: this study evaluates the most relevant factors affecting the performance in mathematics of university undergraduates. Precisely, the mathematical background of students. Spanish secondary education provides an opportunity to develop this analysis since students can choose between two secondary education tracks with different mathematical content and depth. (2) Methods: a survey was conducted covering personal characteristics, socioeconomic status, academic choices and academic achievement as well as a set of questions aimed to uncover attitudes towards mathematics. Students that show preferences regarding mathematics are prone to choose the track with more mathematical content, creating a potential confusion between training and attitudes towards mathematics. We propose an index of non- cognitive skills related to mathematics to account for this problem. (3) Results: prior background in mathematics plays a role in mathematical performance at university even after correcting for non-cognitive skills related to mathematics. The effects are heterogeneous with respect to gender. (4) Conclusions: choosing a more mathematical-oriented itinerary in secondary education seems to give an edge to students. Our results shed light on the implications associated with the decision of secondary school track choice made by students. Furthermore, they are meant to serve as a guide to improve the design of remedial courses.