Dominic Papineau

Prof. Dominic Papineau

London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London W1CH 0AH, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMatthew S. Dodd
Matthew S. Dodd
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
TGTor Grenne
Tor Grenne
JSJohn F. Slack
John F. Slack
MRMartin Rittner
Martin Rittner
CLCrispin T. S. Little
Crispin T. S. Little

1 April 2009 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKurt O. Konhauser
Kurt O. Konhauser
EPErnesto Pecoits
Ernesto Pecoits
SLStefan V. Lalonde
Stefan V. Lalonde
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
ENEuan G. Nisbet
Euan G. Nisbet
Balz Samuel KamberBalz Samuel Kamber
Balz Samuel Kamber

1 March 2010 in Astrobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
The distribution of major phosphate deposits in the Precambrian sedimentary rock record is restricted to periods that witnessed global biogeochemical changes, but the cause of this distribution is unclear. The oldest known phosphogenic event occurred around 2.0 Ga and was followed, after more than 1.3 billion years, by an even larger phosphogenic event in the Neoproterozoic. Phosphorites (phosphate-rich sedimentary rocks that contain more than 15% P 2 O 5 ) preserve a unique record of seawater chemistry, biological activity, and oceanographic changes. In an attempt to emphasize the potentially crucial significance of phosphorites in the evolution of Proterozoic biogeochemical cycles, this contribution provides a review of some important Paleoproterozoic phosphate deposits and of models proposed for their origin. A new model is then presented for the spatial and temporal modes of occurrence of phosphorites along with possible connections to global changes at both ends of the Proterozoic. Central to the new model is that periods of atmospheric oxygenation may have been caused by globally elevated rates of primary productivity stimulated by high fluxes of phosphorus delivery to seawater as a result of increased chemical weathering of continental crust over geological timescales. The striking similarities in biogeochemical evolution between the Paleo- and Neoproterozoic are discussed in light of the two oldest major phosphogenic events and their possible relation to the stepwise rise of atmospheric oxygen that ultimately resulted in significant leaps in biological evolution. Key Words: Precambrian—Primary productivity—Phosphorus—Biogeochemical evolution—Great Oxidation Event. Astrobiology 10, 165–181.

1 August 2005 in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
JWJeffrey J. Walker
Jeffrey J. Walker
SMStephen Mojzsis
Stephen Mojzsis
NPNorman R. Pace
Norman R. Pace
Stromatolites, organosedimentary structures formed by microbial activity, are found throughout the geological record and are important markers of biological history. More conspicuous in the past, stromatolites occur today in a few shallow marine environments, including Hamelin Pool in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Hamelin Pool stromatolites often have been considered contemporary analogs to ancient stromatolites, yet little is known about the microbial communities that build them. We used DNA-based molecular phylogenetic methods that do not require cultivation to study the microbial diversity of an irregular stromatolite and of the surface and interior of a domal stromatolite. To identify the constituents of the stromatolite communities, small subunit rRNA genes were amplified by PCR from community genomic DNA with universal primers, cloned, sequenced, and compared to known rRNA genes. The communities were highly diverse and novel. The average sequence identity of Hamelin Pool sequences compared to the >200,000 known rRNA sequences was only ∼92%. Clone libraries were ∼90% bacterial and ∼10% archaeal, and eucaryotic rRNA genes were not detected in the libraries. The most abundant sequences were representative of novel proteobacteria (∼28%), planctomycetes (∼17%), and actinobacteria (∼14%). Sequences representative of cyanobacteria, long considered to dominate these communities, comprised <5% of clones. Approximately 10% of the sequences were most closely related to those of α-proteobacterial anoxygenic phototrophs. These results provide a framework for understanding the kinds of organisms that build contemporary stromatolites, their ecology, and their relevance to stromatolites preserved in the geological record.

1 February 2019 in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDeng Liu
Deng Liu
YXYangyang Xu
Yangyang Xu
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
NYNa Yu
Na Yu
QFQigao Fan
Qigao Fan
HWHong-Mei Wang
Hong-Mei Wang

23 April 2013 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IKInga Köhler
Inga Köhler
KKKurt O Konhauser
Kurt O Konhauser
Dominic PapineauDominic Papineau
Dominic Papineau
Andrey BekkerAndrey Bekker
Andrey Bekker
Andreas  KapplerAndreas Kappler
Andreas Kappler