While drug prescription should be based on established recommendations stemming from clinical trials but in pediatrics, many drugs are used without marketing authorization. Consequently recommendations are often based on clinical experience and the risk of inappropriate prescription (IP) is high. A tool for detecting IP in pediatrics—called POPI (Pediatrics: Omission of Prescriptions and Inappropriate prescriptions)—has been developed in France. However the relevance of its use at an international level is not known. Our aim has been to adapt POPI for a worldwide use. A two-round Delphi online questionnaire was completed and validated by international experts to identify consensual items. They were asked to rate the validity of each items taking into account the recommendations and practices in their countries. Only propositions obtaining a median score in the upper tertile with an agreement of more than 75% of the panel—for the first round—and 85%—for the second round—were retained. Our panel included 11 pharmacists (55%) and 9 physicians (45%). The panelists came from 12 different countries: England, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Ivory Coast, Ireland, Malaysia, Portugal, Switzerland, Turkey and Vietnam. At the end of the first round, of the 105 items of the original POPI tool, 80 items were retained including 16 items reworded and 25 items were deleted. In the second round, 14 experts participated in the study. This final international POPI tool is composed of 73 IP and omissions of prescriptions in the fields of neuropsychiatry, dermatology, infectiology, pneumology, gastroenterology, pain and fever. This study highlights international consensus on prescription practice in pediatrics. The use of this tool in everyday practice could reduce the risk of inappropriate prescription. The impact of the diffusion of POPI tool will be assessed in a prospective multicentric study.

International guidelines are published to provide standardized information and fertility preservation (FP) care for adults and children. The purpose of the study was to conduct a modified Delphi process for generating FP guidelines for BGD. A steering committee identified 42 potential FP practices for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds and a final meeting. Consensus was reached for 28 items. Among them, stakeholders rated age-specific information concerning the risk of diminished ovarian reserve after surgery as important but rejected proposals setting various upper and lower age limits for FP. All women should be informed about the benefit/risk balance of oocyte vitrification—in particular about the likelihood of live birth according to age. FP should not be offered in rASRM stages I and II endometriosis without endometriomas. These guidelines could be useful for gynecologists to identify situations at risk of infertility and to better inform women with BGDs who might need personalized counseling for FP.

The majority of hospitalizations of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are related to painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Although the pain of VOC is classically nociceptive, neuropathic pain (NP) has also been demonstrated in SCD patients. The aim of our study is to specify the prevalence of NP during VOCs in SCD children using a dedicated scale and to measure its characteristics. We performed a prospective study that included SCD children hospitalized for an acute VOC. The presence of NP was sought with the DN4 scale on the second and fourth days of hospitalization. A total of 54 SCD children were included in the study. Overall, 41% of the patients (n = 22) experienced neuropathic pain during the VOC, mostly at an early stage (Day 2). The median age, the sex ratio, the location of the pain, and the morphine consumption were similar for patients with and without NP. Our study shows that neuropathic pain is very common during VOCs in SCD children. The absence of identified risk factors should prompt us to be vigilant regardless of the patient’s age, sex, and clinical presentation.

Background: A public health student service was set up by the French government in 2018 with the aim of increasing awareness of primary health promotion among the 47,000 students of medicine and other health professions. It is an annual program involving community-based actions on nutrition, physical activity, addiction or sexuality. Our objective was to evaluate its implementation at local level and the different experiences of the stakeholders. Methods: A quasi-experimental study using process evaluation was performed in a Faculty of Medicine in Paris. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from medical students who carried out preventive health actions, in the institutions in which the actions took place and from a subsample of beneficiaries. Results: One hundred and eight actions were carried out by 341 students in 23 educational or social institutions, mostly high schools (n = 12, 52%). Two thirds of the students did not feel sufficiently prepared to deliver preventive health interventions (65.7%, 224/341); however the beneficiaries found that the interventions were good (278/280, 99,2%). Nineteen (83%) of the host institutions agreed to welcome health service students again, of which 9 required some modifications. For students, the reporting of a satisfactory health service experience was associated with the reporting of skills or knowledge acquisition (p < 0.01). Delivering actions in high schools and to a medium-sized number of beneficiaries per week was associated with students’ satisfaction. No effect of gender or theme of prevention was observed. For 248/341 (72.7%) students, the public health service program prompts them to address prevention issues in the future. Conclusion: The public health service undertaken by medical students through the program is a feasible and acceptable means of delivering preventive actions. Reinforcement of training and closer interaction with the host institutions would improve results.

Background: Determining the success of population health interventions often involves assessing multiple, multidimensional outcomes rather than a single one, which presents significant methodological challenges under the evidence-based medicine paradigm. This scoping review examines outcome selection, analysis, and interpretation, and the accuracy of conclusions in complex digital health interventions promoting health among adolescents and young adults (DHI-AYA). Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, PsycINFO, and CINAHL identified DHI-AYA implemented between 2017 and 2023. Studies were categorised by methodological choice regarding outcome hierarchical position: unique primary, multiple primary, or non-hierarchised outcomes. Outcomes were further classified into effectiveness, process, or economic categories. The authors’ conclusions on intervention success were compared with conclusions drawn by the research team based on the reported outcome analysis strategy. Secondly, four analytical strategies were applied to a subset of selected interventions to illustrate the impact of outcome hierarchical position and number on conclusions about intervention success. Results: Analysis of 100 studies linked to 26 DHI-AYA identified 251 distinct outcomes: 164 effectiveness, 78 process, and 9 economic outcomes. Seven interventions were evaluated using a unique primary outcome, 10 using multiple primary outcomes, and 9 using multiple non-hierarchised outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes were predominantly effectiveness endpoints. The research team reclassified nine interventions (35%) deemed successful by authors as non-conclusive due to statistically conflicting results across outcomes. Most interventions deemed non-conclusive by the research team were evaluated using non-hierarchised outcomes (7/10, 70%). The choice of outcome analysis strategy substantially affected conclusions on intervention success. Conclusions: Discrepancies in intervention success assessments highlight the need for enhanced transparency, robustness, and trustworthiness in conclusion-drawing processes. In response, five methodological proposals are formulated: (1) developing core outcome sets specific to population health intervention research (PHIR), (2) collaboratively selecting multidimensional outcomes through a steering committee that accounts for stakeholder preferences and existing theoretical models, (3) exploring multi-criteria decision analysis and consensus-driven methods to transparently combine outcomes, (4) enhancing methodological reporting through intervention development and evaluation to improve scientific integrity and reproducibility, and (5) increasing PHIR expert involvement in ethics, funding, and evaluation committees to improve recognition of evidence produced in this field. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42023401979.

La transition entre la pédiatrie et la médecine pour adultes est une période charnière pour les adolescents et jeunes adultes porteurs d’une maladie chronique : elle comporte un fort risque de rupture du parcours de soins et de dégradation de l’état de santé à court et long termes. Pour accompagner ce passage, plusieurs plateformes de transition ont été créées ces dernières années en France, dans des hôpitaux pédiatriques ou dans les hôpitaux pour adultes. Leur objectif commun est d’être un lieu ressource offrant un accueil physique des jeunes et de leurs parents autour des questions liées à cette transition, ainsi qu’un accès aux informations utiles à leurs besoins de santé globale. Elles travaillent en partenariat étroit avec les services de soins et les associations de patients. Une forte hétérogénéité de fonctionnement et d’offre de soins est observée dans ces structures encore récentes, qu’il convient de multiplier et de pérenniser. Le principal défi à relever dans les prochaines années est de renforcer les partenariats entre pédiatrie et hôpitaux pour adultes afin de baliser au mieux le parcours de soin des jeunes porteurs d’une maladie chronique. The transition of care between pediatric and adult care is a key-period for adolescents with chronic disease, because of the high risk of follow-up loss and of short-term and long-term poorer health. To support transition, platforms of transition have been created in France since several years, implemented in pediatric or adult care structures. Their common objective is to provide a physical reception of adolescents and their parents to share about transition issues, and to inform them about resources to enhance the adolescent’s global health. They tend to work closely with the referent health care providers and the patients’ associations. A large heterogeneity of functioning and health care supply is still observed in these recent structures. Supporting these structures and reinforcing the partnerships between pediatric and adults care remain a challenge.