Gary Entrican

Prof. Gary Entrican

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2015 in Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYolanda Corripio-Miyar
Yolanda Corripio-Miyar
JHJayne Hope
Jayne Hope
CMColin McInnes
Colin McInnes
SWSean Wattegedera
Sean Wattegedera
KJKirsty Jensen
Kirsty Jensen
EGElizabeth J Glass
Elizabeth J Glass
Circulating monocytes in several mammalian species can be subdivided into functionally distinct subpopulations based on differential expression of surface molecules. We confirm that bovine monocytes express CD172a and MHC class II with two distinct populations of CD14+CD16low/-CD163+ and CD14−CD16++CD163low- cells, and a more diffuse population of CD14+CD16+CD163+ cells. In contrast, ovine monocytes consisted of only a major CD14+CD16+ subset and a very low percentage of CD14−CD16++cells. The bovine subsets expressed similar levels of CD80, CD40 and CD11c molecules and mRNA encoding CD115. However, further mRNA analyses revealed that the CD14−CD16++ monocytes were CX3CR1highCCR2low whereas the major CD14+ subset was CX3CR1lowCCR2high. The former were positive for CD1b and had lower levels of CD11b and CD86 than the CD14+ monocytes. The more diffuse CD14+CD16+ population generally expressed intermediate levels of these molecules. All three populations responded to stimulation with phenol-extracted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by producing interleukin (IL)-1β, with the CD16++ subset expressing higher levels of IL-12 and lower levels of IL-10. The CD14−CD16++ cells were more endocytic and induced greater allogeneic T cell responses compared to the other monocyte populations. Taken together the data show both similarities and differences between the classical, intermediate and non-classical definitions of monocytes as described for other mammalian species, with additional potential subpopulations. Further functional analyses of these monocyte populations may help explain inter-animal and inter-species variations to infection, inflammation and vaccination in ruminant livestock.

9 March 2006 in Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GEGary Entrican
Gary Entrican
Nick WheelhouseNick Wheelhouse
Nick Wheelhouse
Immune surveillance in the female reproductive tract is dependent on the interplay of many factors that include the expression of pattern recognition receptors on epithelial cells, resident leukocyte populations and hormones, none of which are uniform. The lower reproductive tract must accommodate the presence of commensal organisms whereas the upper reproductive tract is sterile. However, the upper female reproductive tract has its own immunological challenge in that it must tolerate the presence of a semi-allogeneic fetus if pregnancy is to succeed. So, immune activation and effector mechanisms to control pathogens may be qualitatively and quantitatively different along the reproductive tract. Our knowledge of innate and adaptive immunity in the sheep is less comprehensive than that of human or mouse. Nevertheless, comparative studies suggest that there are likely to be conserved innate immune sensory mechanisms (e.g. Toll-like receptors) and defence mechanisms (anti-proteases, defensins) that combine to limit infection in its early stages while shaping the adaptive response that leads to immunological memory and long-term protection. There are many pathogens that target the reproductive tract, and in particular the placenta, where specialised immunoregulatory mechanisms are operational. Among such pathogens are bacteria belonging to the genera Chlamydia/Chlamydophila that chronically infect the reproductive tracts of sheep and humans and ultimately cause disease through inflammation and tissue damage. An understanding of the immunological microenvironment of the reproductive tract is important for the design of novel control strategies to control chlamydial disease.

1 July 2015 in Molecular Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GEGary Entrican
Gary Entrican
SWSean R. Wattegedera
Sean R. Wattegedera
DGDavid J. Griffiths
David J. Griffiths
Animal models of human disease are important tools in many areas of biomedicine; for example, in infectious disease research and in the development of novel drugs and medical devices. Most studies involving animals use rodents, in particular congenic mice, due to the availability of a wide number of strains and the ease with which they can be genetically manipulated. The use of mouse models has led to major advances in many fields of research, in particular in immunology but despite these advances, no animal model can exactly reproduce all the features of human disease. It is increasingly becoming recognised that in many circumstances mice do not provide the best model and that alternative species may be more appropriate. Here, we describe the relative merits of sheep as biomedical models for human physiology and disease in comparison to mice, with a particular focus on reproductive and respiratory pathogens.

16 December 2014 in BMC Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DVDelfien Verhelst
Delfien Verhelst
SCStéphane De Craeye
Stéphane De Craeye
GEGary Entrican
Gary Entrican
PDPierre Dorny
Pierre Dorny
Eric CoxEric Cox
Eric Cox
In many countries, Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a major cause of reproductive disorders and abortions in the sheep industry, and therefore responsible for important financial and economic losses. In addition, undercooked infected lamb is an important risk factor for human toxoplasmosis. In the present study, the initial phase of the infection was investigated: the parasite’s entry site, the subsequent distribution of the parasite and the host-immune response. Parasite DNA was already detected in the cranial small intestinal mucosa the first days after oral infection with T. gondii tissue cysts. Simultaneously, high IFN-gamma and IL-12 responses were induced mainly in the mesenteric lymph nodes. The emergence of IgG1 (at 8dpi), and IgG2 (at 11 dpi) was accompanied by a decrease or even disappearance of the IFN-gamma and IL-12 response in the Peyers’ patches (PP), PBMC’s and popliteal LN’s. Meanwhile the parasite DNA could be recovered from most mucosal and systemic tissues to become undetectable in the small intestine, popliteal LN, PBMC and spleen 3 weeks pi. Our results indicate that parasites enter the cranial small intestine the first days after infection and that after an increase the first two weeks after infection, the parasite DNA levels in the intestine drop below the detection limit three weeks after infection. This coincides with an increase in parastic-specific serum IgG1 and IgG2 and a decrease of the antigen-specific IFN-gamma response in PP, PBMC and popliteal LN. We suggest a role for IFN-gamma and IL-12 in controlling the infection.

1 May 2012 in Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGary Entrican
Gary Entrican
Nick WheelhouseNick Wheelhouse
Nick Wheelhouse
SWSean Wattegedera
Sean Wattegedera
David LongbottomDavid Longbottom
David Longbottom

1 October 2019 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RNRob J. Noad
Rob J. Noad
KSKarl Simpson
Karl Simpson
AFAnthony Fooks
Anthony Fooks
RHRoger Hewson
Roger Hewson
SGSarah Gilbert
Sarah Gilbert
MCMiles W. Carroll
Miles W. Carroll
During the 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa an expert panel was established on the instructions of the UK Prime Minister to identify priority pathogens for outbreak diseases that had the potential to cause future epidemics. A total of 13 priority pathogens were identified, which led to the prioritisation of spending in emerging diseases vaccine research and development from the UK. This meeting report summarises the process used to develop the UK pathogen priority list, compares it to lists generated by other organisations (World Health Organisation, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and summarises clinical progress towards the development of vaccines against priority diseases. There is clear technical progress towards the development of vaccines. However, the availability of these vaccines will be dependent on sustained funding for clinical trials and the preparation of clinically acceptable manufactured material during inter-epidemic periods.