Yongjun Cha

Dr. Yongjun Cha

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSu-Hyun Kim
Su-Hyun Kim
MCMoon Ki Choi
Moon Ki Choi
NPNa Young Park
Na Young Park
JHJae-Won Hyun
Jae-Won Hyun
MLMin Young Lee
Min Young Lee
YCYongjun Cha
Yongjun Cha
We set out to determine the usability of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP), and retinal parameters by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as reliable biomarkers of the progression of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). Forty-three patients scheduled to undergo oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center of Korea between June 2018 and October 2019 were prospectively assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of chemotherapy. Patients were assessed on clinical scales and underwent OCT, sNfL, and sGFAP level measurement at each follow-up visit. By applying the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), OIPN was classified as grade 1 in 12 (28%) patients, grade 2 in 25 (58%), and grade 3 in 5 (12%) at 6 months of chemotherapy. sNfL levels increased during oxaliplatin administration, while serial sGFAP levels or retinal parameters did not change. Patients with grade-3 OIPN showed significantly higher mean sNfL levels than patients with grade 0–2 OIPN at 6 months of treatment. At 4–6 months after completion of chemotherapy, sNfL levels were significantly reduced compared to the levels at 6 months of chemotherapy. Monitoring of sNfL during chemotherapy can indicate ongoing neuroaxonal injury and the severity of OIPN.

1 August 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJune Young Chun
June Young Chun
SKSe Ik Kim
Se Ik Kim
EPEun Young Park
Eun Young Park
SPSang-Yoon Park
Sang-Yoon Park
SKSu-Jin Koh
Su-Jin Koh
MLMyong Cheol Lim
Myong Cheol Lim
Considering the high morbidity and mortality of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with malignancy, they are regarded as a priority for COVID-19 vaccination. However, general vaccine uptake rates among cancer patients are known to be lower than in their healthy counterparts. Thus, we aimed to investigate the attitude and acceptance rates for the COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients and identify predictive factors for vaccination that could be modified to increase vaccine uptake rates, via a paper-based survey (58 items over six domains). A total of 1001 cancer patients participated in this nationwide, multicenter survey between February and April 2021. We observed that 61.8% of respondents were willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Positive predictive factors found to be independently associated with vaccination were male gender, older age, obesity, previous influenza vaccination history, absence of cancer recurrence, time since cancer diagnosis over 5 years, and higher EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale scores. Along with the well-known factors that are positively correlated with vaccination, here, we report that patients’ disease status and current health status were also associated with their acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination. Moreover, 91.2% of cancer patients were willing to be vaccinated if their attending physicians recommend it, indicating that almost 30% could change their decision upon physicians’ recommendation. Unlike other factors, which are unmodifiable, physicians’ recommendation is the single modifiable factor that could change patients’ behavior. In conclusion, we firstly report that Korean cancer patients’ acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccination was 61.8% and associated with disease status and current health status. Physicians should play a major role in aiding cancer patients’ decision-making concerning COVID-19 vaccines.

17 May 2017 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDae‐Won Lee
Dae‐Won Lee
SHSae‐Won Han
Sae‐Won Han
YCYongjun Cha
Yongjun Cha
JBJeong Mo Bae
Jeong Mo Bae
HKHwang‐Phill Kim
Hwang‐Phill Kim
TKTae-You Kim
Tae-You Kim

9 October 2010 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJiyoung Rhee
Jiyoung Rhee
SHSae-Won Han
Sae-Won Han
YCYongjun Cha
Yongjun Cha
HHHye Seon Ham
Hye Seon Ham
HKHwang-Phill Kim
Hwang-Phill Kim
TKTae-You Kim
Tae-You Kim


15 April 2023 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYongjun Cha
Yongjun Cha
SKSheehyun Kim
Sheehyun Kim
SHSae-Won Han
Sae-Won Han
Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing has demonstrated clinical utility for tumor molecular profiling at initial diagnosis or tumor progression in advanced solid cancers and is being rapidly incorporated into the clinical practice guidelines, including non–small cell lung and breast cancer. Despite relatively low sensitivity, plasma ctDNA sequencing has several advantages over tissue-based assays, including ease of sampling, rapid turnaround time, repeatability, and the ability to overcome spatial heterogeneity, which makes it ideal for investigating acquired resistance and monitoring tumor evolution and dynamics. With technological advancement and declining costs, the clinical application of plasma ctDNA is expanding, and numerous ongoing clinical trials are examining its potential to guide the management of advanced, localized, and even preclinical cancers of various tumor types. The ability of plasma ctDNA analysis to detect minimal residual disease following curative treatment in the absence of clinical disease is among its most promising attributes. Plasma ctDNA sequencing can also facilitate the conduct of clinical trials and drug development, particularly in immunotherapy. In order to incorporate plasma ctDNA sequencing for clinical decision-making, it is important to understand the preanalytical and analytical factors that may affect its sensitivity and reliability.