Ernesto Di Cesare

Prof. Dr. Ernesto Di Cesare

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2011 in Investigative Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSFrancesco Sardanelli
Francesco Sardanelli
FPFranca Podo
Franca Podo
FSFilippo Santoro
Filippo Santoro
SMSiranoush Manoukian
Siranoush Manoukian
SBSilvana Bergonzi
Silvana Bergonzi
AMAlessandro Del Maschio
Alessandro Del Maschio
Objectives: To prospectively compare clinical breast examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a multicenter surveillance of high-risk women. Materials and Methods: We enrolled asymptomatic women aged ≥25: BRCA mutation carriers; first-degree relatives of BRCA mutation carriers, and women with strong family history of breast/ovarian cancer, including those with previous personal breast cancer. Results: A total of 18 centers enrolled 501 women and performed 1592 rounds (3.2 rounds/woman). Forty-nine screen-detected and 3 interval cancers were diagnosed: 44 invasive, 8 ductal carcinoma in situ; only 4 pT2 stage; 32 G3 grade. Of 39 patients explored for nodal status, 28 (72%) were negative. Incidence per year-woman resulted 3.3% overall, 2.1% <50, and 5.4% ≥50 years (P < 0.001), 4.3% in women with previous personal breast cancer and 2.5% in those without (P = 0.045). MRI was more sensitive (91%) than clinical breast examination (18%), mammography (50%), ultrasonography (52%), or mammography plus ultrasonography (63%) (P < 0.001). Specificity ranged 96% to 99%, positive predictive value 53% to 71%, positive likelihood ratio 24 to 52 (P not significant). MRI showed significantly better negative predictive value (99.6) and negative likelihood ratio (0.09) than those of the other modalities. At receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve of MRI (0.97) was significantly higher than that of mammography (0.83) or ultrasonography (0.82) and not significantly increased when MRI was combined with mammography and/or ultrasonography. Of 52 cancers, 16 (31%) were diagnosed only by MRI, 8 of 21 (38%) in women <50, and 8 of 31 (26%) in women ≥50 years of age. Conclusion: MRI largely outperformed mammography, ultrasonography, and their combination for screening high-risk women below and over 50.

18 December 2012 in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLorella Polidoro
Lorella Polidoro
GPG. Properzi
G. Properzi
FMFrancesco Marampon
Francesco Marampon
GGG. L. Gravina
G. L. Gravina
CFC. Festuccia
C. Festuccia
CFClaudio Ferri
Claudio Ferri

11 May 2014 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CFClaudio Festuccia
Claudio Festuccia
AMAndrea Mancini
Andrea Mancini
GGGiovanni Luca Gravina
Giovanni Luca Gravina
LSLuca Scarsella
Luca Scarsella
Sílvia LlorensSílvia Llorens
Sílvia Llorens
MCManuel Carmona
Manuel Carmona
Crocus sativusL. extracts (saffron) are rich in carotenoids. Preclinical studies have shown that dietary intake of carotenoids has antitumor effects suggesting their potential preventive and/or therapeutic roles. We have recently reported that saffron (SE) and crocin (CR) exhibit anticancer activity by promoting cell cycle arrest in prostate cancer (PCa) cells. It has also been demonstrated that crocetin esters are produced after SE gastrointestinal digestion by CR hydrolysis. The aim of the present report was to investigate if SE, crocetin (CCT), and CR affectedin vivotumor growth of two aggressive PCa cell lines (PC3 and 22rv1) which were xenografted in male nude mice treated by oral gavage with SE, CR, and CCT. We demonstrated that the antitumor effects of CCT were higher when compared to CR and SE and treatments reverted the epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) as attested by the significant reduction of N-cadherin and beta-catenin expression and the increased expression of E-cadherin. Additionally, SE, CR, and CCT inhibited PCa cell invasion and migration through the downmodulation of metalloproteinase and urokinase expression/activity suggesting that these agents may affect metastatic processes. Our findings suggest that CR and CCT may be dietary phytochemicals with potential antitumor effects in biologically aggressive PCa cells.

4 April 2019 in La radiologia medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Federico BrunoFederico Bruno
Federico Bruno
FAFrancesco Arrigoni
Francesco Arrigoni
SMSilvia Mariani
Silvia Mariani
ASAlessandra Splendiani
Alessandra Splendiani
ECErnesto Di Cesare
Ernesto Di Cesare
Antonio BarileAntonio Barile
Antonio Barile

24 March 2014 in International Journal of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFrancesco Marampon
Francesco Marampon
GGGiovanni Luca Gravina
Giovanni Luca Gravina
BZBianca Maria Zani
Bianca Maria Zani
VPVladimir M. Popov
Vladimir M. Popov
AFAmato Fratticci
Amato Fratticci
CFClaudio Festuccia
Claudio Festuccia
Spandidos Publications is a scientific publisher with a long-standing international reputation for excellent standards and high quality science publications

23 March 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Federico BrunoFederico Bruno
Federico Bruno
VGVincenza Granata
Vincenza Granata
FBFlavia Cobianchi Bellisari
Flavia Cobianchi Bellisari
FSFerruccio Sgalambro
Ferruccio Sgalambro
Emanuele TommasinoEmanuele Tommasino
Emanuele Tommasino
Antonio BarileAntonio Barile
Antonio Barile
In the last decades, nanotechnology has been used in a wide range of biomedical applications, both diagnostic and therapeutic. In this scenario, imaging techniques represent a fundamental tool to obtain information about the properties of nanoconstructs and their interactions with the biological environment in preclinical and clinical settings. This paper reviews the state of the art of the application of magnetic resonance imaging in the field of nanomedicine, as well as the use of nanoparticles as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, especially in cancer, including the characteristics that hinder the use of nanoparticles in clinical practice.