A proportion of patients with COVID-19 have symptoms past the acute disease phase, which may affect quality of life. It is important for clinicians to be aware of this “long-COVID-19” syndrome to better diagnose, treat, and prevent it. We reviewed clinical and laboratory characteristics of a COVID-19 cohort in a Toronto, Ontario tertiary care center. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and patients were classified as “long-COVID-19” or “non-long-COVID-19” using consensus criteria. Of 397 patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 223 met inclusion criteria, and 62 (27%) had long-COVID-19. These patients had a similar age distribution compared to non-long-COVID-19 patients overall but were younger in the admitted long COVID-19 group. The long-COVID-19 group had more inpatients compared to the non-long-COVID-19 group (39% vs. 25%) and more frequent supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation use. However, long-COVID-19 patients did not differ by duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, comorbidities, or values of common laboratory tests ordered. The most frequent symptoms associated with long-COVID-19 were fatigue and weakness, as reported most commonly by the infectious disease, respirology and cardiology disciplines. In conclusion, by retrospective chart review, 27% of COVID-19 patients presenting to a tertiary care center in Toronto, Canada, were found to meet criteria for long-COVID-19. Past medical history and routine laboratory testing at presentation did not predict for long-COVID-19 development.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations are detected in approximately 20–30% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with the presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation being associated with an inferior outcome. Assessment of FLT3 mutational status is now essential to define optimal upfront treatment in both newly diagnosed and relapsed AML, to support post-induction allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) decision-making, and to evaluate treatment response via measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) evaluation. In view of its importance in AML diagnosis and management, the Canadian Leukemia Study Group/Groupe canadien d’étude sur la leucémie (CLSG/GCEL) undertook the development of a consensus statement on the clinical utility of FLT3 mutation testing, as members reported considerable inter-center variability across Canada with respect to testing availability and timing of use, methodology, and interpretation. The CLSG/GCEL panel identified key clinical and hematopathological questions, including: (1) which patients should be tested for FLT3 mutations, and when?; (2) which is the preferred method for FLT3 mutation testing?; (3) what is the clinical relevance of FLT3-ITD size, insertion site, and number of distinct FLT3-ITDs?; (4) is there a role for FLT3 analysis in MRD assessment?; (5) what is the clinical relevance of the FLT3-ITD allelic burden?; and (6) how should results of FLT3 mutation testing be reported? The panel followed an evidence-based approach, taken together with Canadian clinical and laboratory experience and expertise, to create a consensus document to facilitate a more uniform approach to AML diagnosis and treatment across Canada.

Background: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, or long COVID, is a condition characterized by persistent COVID-19 symptoms. As long COVID is defined by clinical criteria after an elapsed period, an opportunity for early intervention may aid in future prophylactic approaches; however, at present, the pathobiological mechanisms are multifactorial. By analyzing early virally infected upper respiratory tract tissue prior to eventual clinical diagnosis, it may be possible to identify biomarkers of altered immune response to facilitate future studies and interventions. Methods: This is a sub-group analysis of samples collected from those with confirmed COVID-19. RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal/mid-turbinate samples, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis were performed to analyze long COVID and non-long COVID cohorts at day 14 post infection. Differences in mean viral load at various timepoints were analyzed as well as serological data. Results: We identified 26 upregulated genes in patients experiencing long COVID. Dysregulated pathways including complement and fibrinolysis pathways and IL-7 upregulation. Additionally, genes involved in neurotransmission were dysregulated, and the long COVID group had a significantly higher viral load and slower viral clearance. Conclusions: Uncovering early gene pathway abnormalities associated with eventual long COVID diagnosis may aid in early identification. We show that, post acute infection, in situ pathogenic deviations in viral response are associated with patients destined to meet consensus long COVID diagnosis that is entirely dependent on clinical factors. These results identify an important biological temporal window in the natural history of COVID-19 infection and long COVID pathogenesis amenable to testing from standard-of-care upper respiratory tract specimens.

COVID-19 presents with a breadth of symptomatology including a spectrum of clinical severity requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We investigated the mucosal host gene response at the time of gold standard COVID-19 diagnosis using clinical surplus RNA from upper respiratory tract swabs. Host response was evaluated by RNA-sequencing, and transcriptomic profiles of 44 unvaccinated patients including outpatients and in-patients with varying levels of oxygen supplementation were included. Additionally, chest X-rays were reviewed and scored for patients in each group. Host transcriptomics revealed significant changes in the immune and inflammatory response. Patients destined for the ICU were distinguished by the significant upregulation of immune response pathways and inflammatory chemokines, including cxcl2 which has been linked to monocyte subsets associated with COVID-19 related lung damage. In order to temporally associate gene expression profiles in the upper respiratory tract at diagnosis of COVID-19 with lower respiratory tract sequalae, we correlated our findings with chest radiography scoring, showing nasopharygeal or mid-turbinate sampling can be a relevant surrogate for downstream COVID-19 pneumonia/ICU severity. This study demonstrates the potential and relevance for ongoing study of the mucosal site of infection of SARS-CoV-2 using a single sampling that remains standard of care in hospital settings. We highlight also the archival value of high quality clinical surplus specimens, especially with rapidly evolving COVID-19 variants and changing public health/vaccination measures.

Clinical decision making in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) critically relies on rapid genomic characterization. To better understand the AML diagnostic landscape in Canada, the Canadian Leukemia Study Group (CLSG) conducted a survey of laboratory hematology leadership (n = 18) at 16 laboratories across 10 provinces, administered using Google Forms in September 2024. Nearly all surveyed sites were equipped to deliver a full suite of testing platforms through existing on-site infrastructure or laboratory partnerships. Reporting practices varied in terms of genomic integration into bone marrow results and the use of AML classification systems. Turn-around-time (TAT) targets were predominantly determined through internal institutional consensus (62%) or recommendations by provincial cancer agencies/international groups (44%). TAT reduction was a top priority for 56% of laboratories, suggesting timely biomarker results to be an active area for improvement. Various treatment-determining biomarkers were frequently assessed as rapid-tests (defined as a 5-day TAT), including FLT3-ITD (69%), FLT3-TKD (56%), and NPM1 (56%), while others such as IDH1 and TP53 were rapid at a limited number of laboratories. Respondents demonstrated a strong shared interest in joint projects such as the validation of AML measurable residual disease (MRD) assays (56%). There was also unanimous support for establishing CLSG AML laboratory consensus guidelines. This survey documents the current state of Canadian AML laboratories and provides a foundation for future shared development projects.