The morphology and biomechanics of infant crania undergo significant changes between the pre- and post-weaning phases due to increasing loading of the masticatory system. The aims of this study were to characterize the changes in muscle forces, bite forces and the pattern of mechanical strain and stress arising from the aforementioned forces across crania in the first 48 months of life using imaging and finite element methods. A total of 51 head computed tomography scans of normal individuals were collected and analysed from a larger database of 217 individuals. The estimated mean muscle forces of temporalis, masseter and medial pterygoid increase from 30.9 to 87.0 N, 25.6 to 69.6 N and 23.1 to 58.9 N, respectively (0–48 months). Maximum bite force increases from 90.5 to 184.2 N (3–48 months). There is a change in the pattern of strain and stress from the calvaria to the face during postnatal development. Overall, this study highlights the changes in the mechanics of the craniofacial system during normal development. It further raises questions as to how and what level of changes in the mechanical forces during the development can alter the morphology of the craniofacial system.

Fluctuating Asymmetry (FA) in morphology is used as a proxy for developmental instability in response to stress factors. FA has important implications for understanding the impact of differential environments and stressors on the skeletal phenotype. Here, we explore FA in the mandibular morphology of wild and captive Macaca fuscata to detect differences induced by the captive environment. We use two different approaches in Geometric Morphometrics to characterise the degree and patterns of FA and Directional Asymmetry (DA) based on 3D mandibular landmarks. Our results show that the wild and captive groups exhibit morphological dissimilarities in the symmetric component of shape while no significant degree of asymmetry (fluctuating or directional) was detected. Based on our results and on previous literature on the subject, we suggest that (I) captivity is likely to affect the mandibular morphology of M. fuscata; (II) FA may not be a suitable indicator to detect stress in the conditions analysed; and that (III) the mandible may not be the ideal region to study asymmetry because of its functional nature.

The nasal septum has been postulated to have an intrinsic growth power and act as a pacemaker for facial development, its interactions with local craniofacial structures likely to influence facial anatomy and morphology. Recent studies have begun to investigate the link between nasal septum deviation and facial asymmetry; however, the magnitude and mechanisms of this relation are still unclear. This study aimed to analyse the degree of nasal septum deviation in a sample of infants and children (males and females from 0 to 8 years old) and its correlation with the three-dimensional structure of the facial skeleton. The scope was to test whether septal deviation is linked, and might cause, the development of a more asymmetric face. For this aim, 41 3D landmarks (homologous points) were collected on the nasal septum and cranial surface of 46 specimens extracted from medical CT-scans and were analysed using Geometric Morphometrics, Multiple Linear regressions, Multivariate ANOVAs, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results showed no significant correlation between magnitude of septal deviation and the ontogeny (changes in age) or sex of the sample, but a significant association was found between side of deviation and septal deviation magnitude and frequency. The asymmetric PCA reveals that most of the asymmetry identified is fluctuating, and that changes in the asymmetric morphology of the face are not associated to a specific side of septal deviation. In addition, a series of Multivariate ANOVAs showed that age, sex, and septal deviation have no impact on facial asymmetry, with only age impacting the symmetric development of the facial morphology. When looking at factors impacting the general morphology of the face, age is again the only major driving component, with fluctuating asymmetry and sex only approaching significance. These results could imply a certain degree of dissociation between the mechanisms of facial and septal growth and development; however, an investigation of other key developmental stages in facial morphology is needed to further understand the relation between septal deviation and facial growth.